Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4lq@insightbb.com: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] WTB: 301 knob (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@insightbb.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 21:25:46 -0400
$125 is a bargin for a 301. I have an extra one. It's got a new encoder too. Same price. Just in case anyone else is interested. Steve Ellington N4LQ@insightbb.com -- Original Message -- From: <Able2
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00016.html (11,743 bytes)

2. [TenTec] 301 knob sold (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@insightbb.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 07:52:02 -0400
My 301 knob sold within seconds of posting and I could have sold it 3 more times so far! 73 Steve Ellington N4LQ@insightbb.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00022.html (7,041 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@insightbb.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 08:53:36 -0400
So why did you bring this up in the first place? Echolink not working? Steve Ellington N4LQ@insightbb.com -- Original Message -- From: "Ron Grace" <rjgdag@ntelos.net> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equip
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00048.html (11,338 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] service (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@insightbb.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:35:46 -0400
4 weeks turnaround from TenTec is what I have been hearing for some time now. Even Icom is faster. I shipped a PROII in for repairs due to lightning. Shipping UPS ground took almost 2 weeks round tri
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00510.html (8,998 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] service (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@insightbb.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:53:06 -0400
Both Steve Ellington N4LQ@insightbb.com -- Original Message -- From: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 8:4
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00514.html (11,238 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] service (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@insightbb.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:18:04 -0400
Totally unacceptable. Almost as bad as waiting on a rebate but those are another story. Steve Ellington N4LQ@insightbb.com -- Original Message -- From: <KMerzel@aol.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> S
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00516.html (8,825 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] re" should I buy an Orion now? (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@insightbb.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:33:58 -0400
"Why am I on this reflector? I am asking myself that same question.." For a good laugh?. k3ey "I'm pretty low on time and patience. I want dependability. I want to be able to unbox the rig, power it
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00539.html (9,110 bytes)

8. [TenTec] 3532 (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@insightbb.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:21:24 -0400
Someone listen on 3.532.6mhz and tell me if you hear something strange. Steve Ellington N4LQ@insightbb.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00565.html (6,784 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] 3532 (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@insightbb.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:32:44 -0400
rats. it quit. Sounded like morse but just repeated the same rythm over and over. Now I'm on 3.540 and hear strange data like sigs. I bet the band is wide open and no one knows it! Steve Ellington N4
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00567.html (8,004 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] RFI question for Orion and other TT rigs (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@insightbb.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 13:19:18 -0400
Interesting. What about using copper for shielding? It's not ferrous but seems effective. Perhaps you could elaborate. Steve Ellington N4LQ@insightbb.com -- Original Message -- From: <n3nd@aol.com> T
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00686.html (13,190 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] RFI question for Orion and other TT rigs (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@insightbb.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:58:07 -0400
Bob: I agree. The radio is usually at fault. After all, radios do produce the RF and it should be able to survive in it's own RF field. This goes to peripherals such as keyers too. I've had some earl
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00694.html (12,313 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec and Butternut HF6V Problem And Question (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@insightbb.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:54:00 -0400
There is in fact a little know compatibility issue between TenTec and Butternut products. Due to the faster than usual QSK, the RF leaving the rig tends to achieve higher velocity than inferior rigs.
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00714.html (12,542 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] OT: Lightning and Grounds (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@insightbb.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:25:46 -0400
The only safe thing to do is disconnect the antenna and ground from the rigs. I've used a large knife swich to disconnect my ground but lately I've just disconnected the rig's main coax from the Alph
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00758.html (9,904 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] OT: Lightning and Grounds (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@insightbb.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:31:45 -0400
Good but I feel it's important to keep the antenna at ground potential. I found this out the hard way once when lightning actually hit the cf zepp directly. It came down the feeder then jumped 10 fee
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00761.html (10,991 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu