Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4py@arrl.net: 426 ]

Total 426 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TenTec] How do the new filters work in the recent JupiterFirmwareupgrade? (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:48:17 -0500
The new filters are much sharper on the Jupiter. They are a big improvement over the 300 hertz filter. The RF gain control on the Jupiter now works like the latest Orion firmware. That is, as you red
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01145.html (9,766 bytes)

102. Re: [TenTec] Orion Question (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:01:10 -0500
The biggest difference between using a relay and a transistor is the time it takes to do the switch. A transistor will switch in a few microseconds. A relay will take in the order of 10 milliseconds
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01294.html (10,124 bytes)

103. Re: [TenTec] Orion Question (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:21:28 -0500
The TXOUT line is ground during transmit. You can use this line to the base of a PNP transistor to switch a 3 to 12 volt line on and off. You connect the base of the transistor through a 1K resistor
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01296.html (13,222 bytes)

104. Re: [TenTec] Orion II AT tuner question (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:18:42 -0500
I looked at the schematic. Antenna 1 comes directly to a jack. If you have the tuner installed, there is a jumper from this jack that goes out directly to the tuner. If you don't have the tuner, ther
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01348.html (8,872 bytes)

105. Re: [TenTec] Orion II AT tuner question (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:56:41 -0500
Grant, You are correct about what you say. But common sense would say that if they didn't want the tuner in the receive path, they would have just put the tuner in series with the transmit low pass f
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01361.html (10,465 bytes)

106. Re: [TenTec] Orion II AT tuner question (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:41:05 -0500
Can you repeat the test with the tuner tuned to a low frequency like 80 or 160 meters? Or how about inputting a signal on 28 mhz that should be about S9 with the tuner properly tuned for that band an
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01378.html (10,240 bytes)

107. Re: [TenTec] Orion II AT tuner question (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 22:35:18 -0500
Of course what you said is true, but it is still better to have a matched antenna on receive. There is always the possiblity of very low atmosheric noise on a given night and the extra signal just mi
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01388.html (11,115 bytes)

108. Re: [TenTec] Orion II AT tuner question (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 10:14:07 -0500
My guess on the tuner is that it goes into bypass mode when you do a band change. I'm going to ask TT. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message -- Fro
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00008.html (13,936 bytes)

109. Re: [TenTec] Problem: Please confirm Orion II Radios (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 23:57:33 -0400
My OII does fail in this scenario. I just did a battery reset followed by a master reset and it still fails. My fails with just 3 steps: 1) Set NB to 2 2) Set NR to 2 3) Turn on manual notch and it f
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00068.html (11,401 bytes)

110. [TenTec] New LDG AT-200 PC Autotuner (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 19:22:17 -0400
For people who have Tentec radios and did not get the internal tuner, LDG has just come out with a new tuner that is a little different. This tuner operates 100 % from software. There are no front pa
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00098.html (7,818 bytes)

111. Re: [TenTec] General coverage RX/XCVR suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 13:23:15 -0400
The rx340 is the very best but of course very pricey. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message -- From: "AL7CR" <al7cr@punakea.com> To: <tentec@contes
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00129.html (12,179 bytes)

112. Re: [TenTec] The Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 08:13:21 -0400
I have done extensive tests with transmitting with my OII and recording the received audio through my rx340. I am using my Heil HC5 goldline. The bottom line is the transmit audio with my Orion II is
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00158.html (9,612 bytes)

113. Re: [TenTec] The Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 12:36:27 -0400
To get excellent audio, the key is to not overdrive the radio. The ALC light should just occationally blink. I run my EQ settings at the factory settings and use a 2400 hertz transmit filter. I reall
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00178.html (9,882 bytes)

114. [TenTec] Orion Internal Tuner (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 16:38:59 -0400
I just got a response from TenTec about the internal tuner. The internal tuner is in line for both transmit and receive on the antenna 1 path. When a band change is done, the internal tuner is bypass
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00191.html (10,154 bytes)

115. Re: [TenTec] RX-320 / RX320D (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:10:49 -0400
The 320D has a jack to bring out the 12 khz IF for DRM decoding to a sound card. That's the only difference. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00339.html (7,740 bytes)

116. Re: [TenTec] omni d series c display problem (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:02:24 -0400
Check the double RCA jumper on the back of the radio for the external VFO. Make sure it is making a good connection. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00357.html (9,128 bytes)

117. [TenTec] Orion Main and Sub frequency difference (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:17:20 -0400
Bill, I don't know why I never thought of this before but I have a diversity mode in my N4PY Orion program. It sets the two radios to the same frequency as you tune with the remote tuning pod. I can
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00397.html (7,368 bytes)

118. Re: [TenTec] Orion Main and Sub frequency difference (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 21:12:24 -0400
Yes, I have a full software frequency calibration routine. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message -- From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net> To: "Carl M
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00406.html (9,450 bytes)

119. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and MixW cat issues (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:03:09 -0400
If you run my N4PY Orion software in combination with MixW, all is well. MixW can be configured to work with my software and the OII in complete harmony. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00516.html (8,716 bytes)

120. Re: [TenTec] Airpax breaker part number (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:59:27 -0400
The part number he gave you is exactly the correct one. A 20 amp fast breaker. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message -- From: "Kirk Braunius" <kbra
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00588.html (8,664 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu