Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4py@arrl.net: 426 ]

Total 426 documents matching your query.

341. Re: [TenTec] Orion II AT tuner question (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:56:41 -0500
Grant, You are correct about what you say. But common sense would say that if they didn't want the tuner in the receive path, they would have just put the tuner in series with the transmit low pass f
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01366.html (11,462 bytes)

342. Re: [TenTec] Orion II AT tuner question (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:41:05 -0500
Can you repeat the test with the tuner tuned to a low frequency like 80 or 160 meters? Or how about inputting a signal on 28 mhz that should be about S9 with the tuner properly tuned for that band an
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01383.html (10,677 bytes)

343. Re: [TenTec] Orion II AT tuner question (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 22:35:18 -0500
Of course what you said is true, but it is still better to have a matched antenna on receive. There is always the possiblity of very low atmosheric noise on a given night and the extra signal just mi
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01393.html (11,048 bytes)

344. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews? (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:54:57 -0500
My Orion II has been working flawlessly for me. The sweep is excellent and much faster than my 756pro. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message -- Fro
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00073.html (9,829 bytes)

345. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 14:09:36 -0500
Rick is correct about this. If you make open wire line out of coax and ground the shields, you have twice the loss of running a single coax line. If you want to make open wire line out of coax, then
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00082.html (13,467 bytes)

346. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:41:45 -0500
Toby, In the old versions, although the S meter still operated from S0, with the RF gain was reduced, the S meter dropped in value and was always wrong for all signals. With the new RF gain S meter i
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00286.html (12,906 bytes)

347. Re: [TenTec] S meter and RF gain (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:58:48 -0500
Of course, the best solution would be for the S meter on the Orion to work just like the RX340. The RX340 S meter always reads correctly regardless of RF gain setting, attenuator setting, preamp sett
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00298.html (9,612 bytes)

348. Re: [TenTec] com speed on Orion v2 (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:06:59 -0500
It is definitely faster with V2 and also the OII. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message -- From: "Lee A Crocker" <lee_crocker@yahoo.com> To: <tente
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00599.html (7,836 bytes)

349. [TenTec] Help with New Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:15:22 -0500
The SSB signal has width to it and is typically 3 khz wide. For an LSB signal 2 khz above you, that means his signal has pieces that go as far as 1 khz below you and up to 2 khz above you. So there i
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00600.html (9,711 bytes)

350. [TenTec] Orion and Acom amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:53:26 -0500
See the tentec website about the Orion working with an ACOM amplifier. There is a filter that fixes this problem. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Mes
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00626.html (10,582 bytes)

351. Re: [TenTec] to Carl: (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:16:48 -0500
With the V2 mod and the V2 firmware, the Orion sweep is much faster. Also, V2 should be much more stable. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message --
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00630.html (8,290 bytes)

352. Re: [TenTec] Help with New Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:06:13 -0500
The SSB signal has width to it and is typically 3 khz wide. For an LSB signal 2 khz above you, that means his signal has pieces that go as far as 1 khz below you and up to 2 khz above you. So there i
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00697.html (10,409 bytes)

353. Re: [TenTec] For Sale : Orion #762 600Hz Roofing Filter (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:48:48 -0500
The OII uses the exact same IF as the Orion. But the filters for the Orion will not physically plug into the Orion II because they are a different size. I actually made an adapter to use the 762 filt
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00779.html (9,485 bytes)

354. Re: [TenTec] Orion Speech Compressors (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:27:14 -0500
I also have the TT 234 speech processor. I use it with my Orion and now my Orion II. I do not use the speech processor in the Orion. The thing I like about the 234 is the clipping action when properl
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00914.html (9,486 bytes)

355. Re: [TenTec] Another Possible O-II Issue (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:05:44 -0500
The sub sounds tinny because of the PBT differences. This has always been the case, even with the Orion I. There is a difference on how the filters are set in the passband with the sub-receiver. You
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01163.html (11,378 bytes)

356. Re: [TenTec] Filter for SAle (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 13:20:29 -0500
I soldered bare wires that were the same diameter as the pins on the new OII filters to the 352 filter. I then carefully bent these wires so they matched up with the holes on the OII filter board. Th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00046.html (8,771 bytes)

357. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II receieve ant switch (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 08:12:36 -0500
How about replacing the slider switch with a SPDT relay. You can then install a switch to control the relay and put it anywhere. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00136.html (9,638 bytes)

358. Re: [TenTec] Firmware (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:33:33 -0500
No way any Orion I firmware can be loaded into the OII. I think the severity of the OII problem is being overly stated. My OII is working fine. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00169.html (8,000 bytes)

359. Re: [TenTec] O2 Noise Reduction (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:47:28 -0500
The Orion and Orion II have one the best hardware noise blankers I have ever seen. Depending on the noise you have, a hardware noise blanker may be much more effective than DSP noise reduction. Noise
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00170.html (8,866 bytes)

360. Re: [TenTec] Paragon brains gone (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 19:11:04 -0500
If you use the old cheap regular battery instead of an alkaline, it will not hurt it to charge it. All the old regular non-alkaline batteries are rechargable to a small extent. In fact it will probab
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00237.html (16,935 bytes)

Current List: 341 - 360
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu