Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4xy@arrl.net: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1)
Author: n4xy@arrl.net (Ed Tanton)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:00:56 -0400
There's absolutely no problem at HF for BNCs at 100W. I have a Waters MIL wattmeter that reads to 2000W that uses BNCs... not that I'd remotely consider putting that much power on it. BNCs have their
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00394.html (9,672 bytes)

2. [TenTec] which side (score: 1)
Author: n4xy@arrl.net (Ed Tanton)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 15:55:54 -0500
Easy: the opposite side from the hand you tune with. 73 Ed Tanton N4XY <n4xy@arrl.net> Ed Tanton N4XY 189 Pioneer Trail Marietta, GA 30068-3466 website: http://www.n4xy.com All emails <IN> & <OUT> ch
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00996.html (7,852 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Filter difference (score: 1)
Author: n4xy@arrl.net (Ed Tanton)
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 17:06:02 -0500
Duane is quite right about filter differences. While I don't have an RX-340 to play with, my Drake R-7 rcvr has the extra 1.8 kHz filter, and the difference that makes over the standard 2.3 kHz filte
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00195.html (8,640 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu