Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4yg@comcast.net: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI + Scan (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:12:52 -0500
I just bought a used Omni VI+. I tried the band scan feature and it sounds lousy. CW sounds chirpy. Sounds great in every other respect. Do I have something set wrong? _______________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00432.html (6,862 bytes)

2. [TenTec] OMNI Vi+ Band Scan (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:22:49 -0500
I just bought a used OMNI VI+ and it seems to work great in every respect except Band Scan. When I do a Band Scan, the frequency of the receiver becomes unstable and CW signals sound very chirpy. The
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00433.html (6,677 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Vacuum Relay for SB-220 QSK (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:48:08 -0500
I am going to put Rich Measures QSK mod into my SB-220. The vacuum relay which cost $30 from Fair Radio at one time now costs $58. Does anyone know of a better source? The only other source I have fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00342.html (7,062 bytes)

4. [TenTec] 3-500Z (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:43:24 -0500
I need a pair of 3-500's. Where is the best place to buy? Joe, N4YG _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00250.html (6,747 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] 3-500 Source (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:31:32 -0500
Thanks to all. RF Parts is the clear winner. I have ordered 3-500ZG-RFP-MP. Joe, N4YG _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00297.html (6,446 bytes)

6. [TenTec] SB-220 Tubes and QSK (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:06:27 -0500
I just want to thank everyone who advised me to buy the RF Parts 3-500ZG tubes for my SB-220. I am very pleased with the tubes. I have about 20% more output power and it is almost unbelievable how mu
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00526.html (8,009 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] SB-220 Tubes and QSK (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:39:37 -0500
I appreciate the comments of both Gerald and Rob. As a practical matter, a fraction of a dB is insignificant, however none of us would accept this degradation in the output of our transmitters, yet w
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00541.html (7,349 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] SB220-Tubes and QSK (score: 1)
Author: N4YG <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 12:36:46 -0500
First, I would like to say that I am delighted to have set off such a nice discussion. Second, getting back to the SB-220, even with only a fraction of a dB gain in output power, I am still exception
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00007.html (8,079 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] ot (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 17:46:44 -0600
You will find that there are several methods of specifying CW speed. I use the definition that you will find in ARRL handbooks, the current one and those dating back several 10's of years. It is quit
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00176.html (8,476 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] ot (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 18:42:09 -0600
WPM = Dots per second / 1.2 it then follows that WPM = Dashes per second / 0.6 _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00179.html (7,644 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] ot (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:20:55 -0600
Thanks to Carl, N4PY for correcting my errors. The correct equation is WPM = 2.4 X Dots per second or WPM = 4.8 X Dashes per second Stated another way, WPM = Number of Dots in 2.4 seconds or Number o
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00189.html (7,787 bytes)

12. [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:02:12 -0600
I received a report of chirp on the signal from my OMNI VI+ during a recent CW qso. The person who gave the report indicated that it was not "bad" chirp and added that he hears chirp on almost every
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00204.html (7,745 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:58:58 -0600
Well it seems that Don is very happy with the Logic EPROM version 1.02 solution, but Paul says it only partially masks the problem at the expense of QSK. What is the effect on QSK? I guess I will jus
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00221.html (7,778 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:19:36 -0600
To answer Carl's question, there is a problem with keying, but I would not call it chirp. I do not hear a change in frequency across the cw dot or dash. I do not like the sound of what I hear. It doe
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00278.html (8,808 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:01:41 -0600
Well the matter of alleged chirp in my OMNI VI+ has finally reached a happy ending. You may be interested in my assessment of the whole matter. I hope I will not offend anyone, however I am not sure
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00402.html (9,721 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] USB-Serial Adapters for Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 11:38:42 -0600
I have not found a USB-Serial adapter which supports every thing that an application programmer could throw at it. I suggest buy an adapter which someone else has used successfully with the same appl
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00134.html (7,746 bytes)

17. [TenTec] USB-to-Serial Converter for use with OMNI VI (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 09:56:11 -0500
Several weeks ago there was a discussion of which USB-to-Serial converter to purchase. I have only had my OMNI VI+ for about 9 months and, at the time I knew nothing of what was available through the
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00051.html (8,155 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] HRD and computer control for OMNI VI ver.3 (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 19:58:35 -0500
I would guess that the problem may be with your Serial Port hookup to the 1/8" phone jack. I have never used the serial port (TTL level) connection but rather the DB-25. I use the cheapest Chinese US
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00092.html (8,192 bytes)

19. [TenTec] OMNI VI+ Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:55:11 -0500
Has anyone operated the OMNI VI+ remotely via the internet? Joe _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00094.html (6,616 bytes)

20. [TenTec] OMNI VI Remote Op (score: 1)
Author: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:10:34 -0500
I would be interested in talking to anyone who has operated an OMNI VI+ remotely via the internet. I would also like to know of anyone interested in remote operation with the OMNI VI. Joe, N4YG _____
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00368.html (6,652 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu