Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n9dg@yahoo.com: 407 ]

Total 407 documents matching your query.

261. Re: [TenTec] Why N1MM does not support the Tentec file interface (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
<snip> I would suggest that an even better way to interface N1MM with Carl's sofware would be to use a programing API. This is how the interface between Carl's software and WriteLog is done. It avoid
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00822.html (9,056 bytes)

262. Re: [TenTec] Why N1MM does not support the Tentec file interface (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
Agree, though it should be complicated enough to be able to accomodate things like you've described below and much more. Yupp. And integration with SSTV/PSK/RTTY/WSJT etc. etc. types programs as well
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00000.html (7,878 bytes)

263. Re: [TenTec] Switching between two Transverters on the Orion (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:11:09 -0800 (PST)
The key concern that I would have is port to port isolation of the switch on the RX IF line. Most switches fall into the range of 30-60db of isolation, that does not seem like nearly enough for when
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00169.html (9,127 bytes)

264. Re: [TenTec] N4PY Orion Control Program Version 1.12 Released (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:43:10 -0800 (PST)
I've never seen any lag here either, even with 4 N4PY sessions running simultaneously controlling 6 Pegasus radios, - 4 of which are sweeping (sweeping is more CPU and serial port traffic intensive).
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00192.html (12,070 bytes)

265. Re: [TenTec] N4PY Orion Control Program Version 1.12 Released (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 21:09:23 -0800 (PST)
Would be curious how much CPU horsepower are you running? After all raw hardware processing power cures a lot of performance ills in software. And if there are many other apps running? If there aren'
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00194.html (10,871 bytes)

266. Re: [TenTec] Radio black outs... (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:17:26 -0800 (PST)
Black outs? what black outs? conditions have been pretty good... That is if you have SSB/CW coverage above all of those "DC" bands (<30Mhz). Those of us who primarily play on 50Mhz and up have been h
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00238.html (9,102 bytes)

267. Re: [TenTec] Peg/Jupiter contesting software (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:37:40 -0800 (PST)
WriteLog definitely is via N4PY software, but don't belive that it can talk to the Jupiter directly though. Duane N9DG __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam?
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00396.html (8,355 bytes)

268. Re: [TenTec] Peg/Jupiter contesting software (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:14:39 -0800 (PST)
Tonight when I got home I confirmed that the Ten Tec Radios supported in WriteLog are the Delta II, Omni V/VI, Orion, and Pegasus. As pointed out by Carl the Pegasus is supported using a 'memory' int
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00406.html (11,383 bytes)

269. [TenTec] First DSP IF Corsair II? (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 14:02:43 -0800 (PST)
I don?t know if any one else has done this before but I have created a DSP IF Corsair II, well sort of. The experimental lash-up that I?m playing with took all of 15 minutes to setup and get going. A
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00116.html (10,692 bytes)

270. Re: [TenTec] First DSP IF Corsair II? (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 16:53:48 -0800 (PST)
Since decided to give this shot just last night the info bellow is pretty much all that there is. Although I have been kicking this basic idea around for some time now, just finally got an SDR-1000 r
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00121.html (15,459 bytes)

271. Re: [TenTec]omni-d (genealogy) (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 07:02:20 -0800 (PST)
Another radio to think about when pondering the Ten Tec genealogy is the 580 Delta. It is rather unique in that it did not use any 9MHz IF filters at all like the 540/544, Omni's, Argosy's, Paragon a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00401.html (11,137 bytes)

272. Re: [TenTec]omni-d (genealogy) - the 580 Delta (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 08:05:11 -0800 (PST)
Ah yes, the first IF at 11-11.5 MHz. The 580 Delta is an interesting design because the first LO is fixed, the band crystal were chosen such that the 1st mixer's output was in the 11-11.5 MHz range,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00407.html (15,265 bytes)

273. Re: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1)
Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:10:41 -0800 (PST)
SDR and digital modes are not synonymous, SDR simply makes the implementing of digital modes and different analog mode types easier to implement in the radio, assuming of course that the SDR is desig
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00608.html (8,563 bytes)

274. Re: [TenTec] Any issues with Corsair II --> SB-200 amp? (score: 1)
Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 17:38:14 -0800 (PST)
I would not directly key a 125V circuit either. In fact the Corsair II manual specifially advises against it. The EXT T/R section of the manual it says in part: "One side of this switch is also at gr
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00651.html (14,140 bytes)

275. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity (score: 1)
Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:34:45 -0800 (PST)
I concur with Steve's assessment regarding the SSB rag chewing case. The Pegasus/Jupiter are probably the two most pleasant SSB rag chewing radios that there are. They are not however the best there
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00703.html (20,999 bytes)

276. Re: [TenTec] Re: More PRO III/Omni VI pix (score: 1)
Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:49:55 -0800 (PST)
I'd be curious what the audio spectrums look like for these two radios in the frequency domain vs. the time domain that these JPEG?s are done in? It is always interesting to see what audio artifacts
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01031.html (10,659 bytes)

277. Re: [TenTec] Re: More PRO III/Omni VI pix (score: 1)
Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 14:46:16 -0800 (PST)
Yes I see the problem regarding the two inputs, so I went back and re-familiarized myself a bit with Spectrogram since its been awhile since I've used it. After experimenting with V6.x briefly this a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01066.html (13,509 bytes)

278. Re: [TenTec] Rx-400 (score: 1)
Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:16:41 -0800 (PST)
Yepp, it definitely doesn't meet the more demanding ham radio requirements for great RX performance while working signals at or bellow the noise floor using narrow band modes like SSB/CW. It doesn't
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01163.html (8,216 bytes)

279. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II power connections (score: 1)
Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 18:26:04 -0800 (PST)
The center two pins are not capable of switching the 25A 13.8V DC current. The front panel switch is only rated for a few amps at most which is all that there would be in the 120V primary of the powe
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01279.html (8,934 bytes)

280. RE: [TenTec] Ten Tec rig I'd like to have. (score: 1)
Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 07:12:12 -0800 (PST)
<snip> My second pipe dream would be That "plug in" architecture would be called the PC PCI bus that's already here. In fact there are hundreds of millions of devices already using it, just not many
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00005.html (8,804 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu