Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n9dg@yahoo.com: 406 ]

Total 406 documents matching your query.

341. Re: [TenTec] Why no DSP upgrades for the 6N2? (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
This is my take on it too. Goes to show that pre-announcing too soon will actually hurt you in the long run. Hopefully the Orions will start shipping for real in September. That'll be 6 or so months
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00253.html (9,365 bytes)

342. Re: [TenTec] RX-340 DSP output (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
<snip> <snip> No doubt there are some tremendous possibilities here. There is no good technical reason why all new ham IF-DSP based gear shouldn't be able to provide a similar kind of digital signal
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00329.html (8,037 bytes)

343. Re: [TenTec] New FREEWARE for Pegasus/Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 09:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
There does seem to be some issue(s) with NT kernel based OSes. I too can't get it to play under Windows 2000, but can under Windows 98. Has anyone tried it with Windows NT 4.0?? Duane N9DG __________
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00349.html (9,651 bytes)

344. Re: [TenTec] USB -> RS232 (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 19:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
I'd rather see Ten Tec put energy and effort into TCP/IP Ethernet interfacing in the next generation radios. It's a far more versatile and open standard than USB. Trying to rationalize a reason or wa
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00368.html (8,761 bytes)

345. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus software (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 18:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
I do on occasion, sometimes I just want use something a little simpler. After all the whole point of a radio like the Pegasus is having the ability to use a multitude of different control programs. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00008.html (7,666 bytes)

346. Re: [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Hmmm, out of curiosity I went and found the so called "review" in question on eHam under the Forums section. Low and behold it is the same individual who couldn't just write a reasoned review of the
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00400.html (15,229 bytes)

347. [TenTec] eham centurion 0 review - suggestions for eHam (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 18:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
A comment on Phil's question he posed in response to my earlier post that said in part: What I have already suggested in a private email to Phil is to add a review page link to easily show all other
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00458.html (10,859 bytes)

348. Re: [TenTec] Annotation to prices in perspective (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 10:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
Comparing historic radio prices against general consumer goods prices does indeed provide an interesting perspective of what today's radios really cost relative our other daily purchases. And no doub
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00505.html (8,575 bytes)

349. Re: [TenTec] Annotation to prices in perspective (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 11:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
My underlying point is that ham radio gear of today is more or less on par with other consumer electronics. They ultimately share much in common technology-wise. Comparing ham gear to other items, es
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00507.html (9,980 bytes)

350. Re: [TenTec] RX-340 DSP Output (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 08:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Bravo Mark, .... now if there were a few more people besides just you and me (or so it seems) who wanted to do these kinds of things with their DSP based radios, we truly could then see a revolutiona
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00648.html (8,783 bytes)

351. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus line out (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 19:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Rich, Are you using a mono wired cable or a stereo wired cable from the Pegasus to the sound card? I have run into some sound cards that don't work well at all if the L&R line-in leads are tied toget
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00664.html (8,598 bytes)

352. Re: [TenTec] Orion RF hardening (was Is Jupiter better...) (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 19:55:47 -0800 (PST)
Actually they need to go beyond just making it "as good" as the competition, they need to strive to be better. If they are better then users can post their complaints about the RF susceptibility of t
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00047.html (9,864 bytes)

353. Re: [TenTec] what is "quiet"? (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 13:10:20 -0800 (PST)
Absolutely, and the closer you can get the analog to digital conversion to the antenna input the less chance there is to introduce all that mixer noise. The key design challenges at that point are to
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00076.html (13,852 bytes)

354. Re: [TenTec] Re: [TenTec]Color change.... (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 14:39:13 -0800 (PST)
I'm curious what the feelings/sentiments are/were for the previous color schemes of Ten Tec rigs? 1. Cream/white? color (early Tritons I - IV, 505/509)? 2. Brushed aluminum (540/544)? 3. Black (the f
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00085.html (8,135 bytes)

355. Re: [TenTec] what is "quiet"? (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 07:52:51 -0800 (PST)
And this is why the cumulative contribution of noise by a multitude of mixer stages is such a thorn, not only do you have the original noise you are incrementally adding more in each mixer stage. And
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00118.html (12,319 bytes)

356. Re: [TenTec] Rig Chart (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 11:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
<snip> I have never been convinced that looking at transmit phase noise plots of a transceiver is a particular valid test to measure its RX phase noise. It's not prudent to assume that the RX phase w
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00210.html (10,047 bytes)

357. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
It seems that most of the distrust and disillusionment of the ARRL reviews is centered on the reviewer?s comments. So how about having reviews that are nothing but cold hard laboratory measurements,
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00328.html (8,514 bytes)

358. Re: [TenTec] Writing about "sound" (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
Scott et al, Coments in-line below: I agree to a point, and you illuminate quite clearly what sells equipment today in the ham radio market, and that is primarily "cosmetics". The seemingly continual
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00347.html (14,135 bytes)

359. Re: [TenTec] 526 and other subjects (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 15:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
I hope so too, the huge price gap between the Jupiter and the Orion is large enough to drive several competing models through. I'm hoping that TT is thinking of a model that uses the same basic desig
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00650.html (7,628 bytes)

360. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Bashing/eHam Reviews (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 09:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
<snip> True indeed, so far most of the measured testing done at the ARRL and their peers is focused on the RF signal handling traits of a radio, little or no testing is done with overall RX system di
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00789.html (10,881 bytes)

Current List: 341 - 360
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu