Mail Archive Search: <+from:na9u@arrl.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:na9u@arrl.net: 83 ]

Total 83 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] re QST ad (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:21:41 -0800 (PST); What your wrote makes sense. However I think my marketing professors head would explode if she read what you wrote. "Marketing is everything and exposure is the currency". 73, John NA9U _____________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01128.html (11,089 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] re QST ad (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:39:28 -0800 (PST); I am having the feet on my O2 shaved 1/32" of an inch. 73, John NA9U _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01141.html (9,434 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Noise Blankers (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:59:28 -0800 (PST); I have had good experiences with my 02 noise blankers. I think the DSP one seems to work better than the hardware one. That makes sense since the hardware is broadband and sits before the DSP. 73, Jo; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01147.html (8,560 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] Tuner and amp (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:01:18 -0800 (PST); 40 watts is all I need to drive my Ameritron amp to full power. I think the Ten Tec amps take more input power by design. 73, John NA9U _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01148.html (10,028 bytes)
45. Re: [TenTec] Another Possible O-II Issue (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:52:33 -0800 (PST); I'll check that out. Along the same lines though I notice my two recievers dont' sound about the same. My main sound bassey and my sub sounds tinny. Anyone elese? John NA9U __________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01164.html (9,417 bytes)
46. [TenTec] Frequency Stability (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 07:36:44 -0800 (PST); I know we have had a bit discussion on frequency stability. I was reading the old brochure from my Kenwood TS-520S a very populare mid-range priced rig in its day (1977). "Frequency Stability - Withi; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01167.html (6,982 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] Orion II Noise Blankers (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 06:19:50 -0800 (PST); Classically, noise blankers were intended to remove ignition noise which is short pulse, short duration, high frequency. John _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTe; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01233.html (13,598 bytes)
48. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec page down (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 06:23:15 -0800 (PST); It is becoming quite a routine occurence. 73, John NA9U _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01234.html (8,108 bytes)
49. Re: [TenTec] PLEASE remove me from ten tec contesting email listthank's K7TST (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 06:25:38 -0800 (PST); Don't you just take yourself off just like you put yourself on? -- "kevin_r89@netzero.net" <kevin_r89@netzero.net> wrote: _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@co; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01235.html (8,220 bytes)
50. Re: [TenTec] LDG Tuner in Orion II? (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 06:28:52 -0800 (PST); Before I got the Orion II I was greatly disappointed that it did not have a memory tuner. Now that I have it I see that it is probably irrelevant and in some cases advantageous to not have memories.; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01236.html (8,875 bytes)
51. Re: [TenTec] Tuner and amp (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:07:55 -0800 (PST); I think a 600 watt amplifier driven by 40 watss fits quite well into this requirement. It is actually 44 watts. John _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contest; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01304.html (14,446 bytes)
52. Re: [TenTec] Which one ? (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 05:52:39 -0800 (PST); Dude?? You're asking a bunch of Ten Tec people whether to buy a Ten Tec or a whatever you asked about. 73, John NA9U _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contest; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00062.html (6,958 bytes)
53. Re: [TenTec] Distorted and "clicky" receive audio; Orion (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 14:55:28 -0800 (PST); I have seen this in CW when the automatic notch is on. It is operated independantly from sub to main which is why you did not hear this in the sub. 73, John NA9U _____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00099.html (8,610 bytes)
54. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 05:20:39 -0800 (PST); I get many compliments on my transmit audio as well. I use the stock Ten Tec mike, the 706A with stock settings. I am quite pleased with it. I am quite pleased with all aspects of the radio including; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00185.html (12,140 bytes)
55. Re: [TenTec] The ORION II sure makes me happy (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 05:41:01 -0800 (PST); The hard lesson I learned from this reflector and the Orion Yahoo groups is that if you don't hate your radio and your not planning litigation against TenTec you're probably too stupid to know any be; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01324.html (9,049 bytes)
56. Re: [TenTec] Orion II AT tuner question (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 13:46:48 -0800 (PST); Yes, I do it on CW quite a bit. I'll hit the tune button usually but sometimes I don't worry about it and just go. I have not seen any foldback at that level of SWR. I won't go beyond 3:1 though. 73,; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00037.html (8,514 bytes)
57. Re: [TenTec] Problem: Please confirm Orion II Radios (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 12:19:06 -0700 (PDT); This is an existing problem on the O2 that has not been addressed yet. I sent it to ditsnbits in late February and have not heard either. Report it, the more the merrier. 73, John NA9U ______________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00043.html (7,956 bytes)
58. Re: [TenTec] Problem: Please confirm Orion II Radios (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 15:55:48 -0700 (PDT); That is strange. This problem as been around since I got my Orion V2.029. It is not unique to 2.032. If its a bug it should happen on all rigs though. Are you sure you duplicated the steps? If so, go; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00054.html (8,768 bytes)
59. Re: [TenTec] Problem: Please confirm Orion II RadiosFIX!!!!! (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 08:06:51 -0700 (PDT); I have had days where I can't make the problem happen. Not really sure why but I think it is a sequence thing. I am still of the belief that this is a bug (or feature if you come from the software wo; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00076.html (7,959 bytes)
60. Re: [TenTec] Nets (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 17:31:16 -0700 (PDT); The nets are on Sunday. John _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00137.html (8,334 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]