Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:na9u@arrl.net: 83 ]

Total 83 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Noise Blankers (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:59:28 -0800 (PST)
I have had good experiences with my 02 noise blankers. I think the DSP one seems to work better than the hardware one. That makes sense since the hardware is broadband and sits before the DSP. 73, Jo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01145.html (9,379 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] Tuner and amp (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:01:18 -0800 (PST)
40 watts is all I need to drive my Ameritron amp to full power. I think the Ten Tec amps take more input power by design. 73, John NA9U
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01146.html (10,825 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] Another Possible O-II Issue (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:52:33 -0800 (PST)
I'll check that out. Along the same lines though I notice my two recievers dont' sound about the same. My main sound bassey and my sub sounds tinny. Anyone elese? John NA9U
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01162.html (9,954 bytes)

64. [TenTec] Frequency Stability (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 07:36:44 -0800 (PST)
I know we have had a bit discussion on frequency stability. I was reading the old brochure from my Kenwood TS-520S a very populare mid-range priced rig in its day (1977). "Frequency Stability - Withi
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01165.html (7,134 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] Orion II Noise Blankers (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 06:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Classically, noise blankers were intended to remove ignition noise which is short pulse, short duration, high frequency. John
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01231.html (13,948 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec page down (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 06:23:15 -0800 (PST)
It is becoming quite a routine occurence. 73, John NA9U
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01232.html (7,922 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] PLEASE remove me from ten tec contesting email list thank's K7TST (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 06:25:38 -0800 (PST)
Don't you just take yourself off just like you put yourself on?
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01233.html (8,046 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] LDG Tuner in Orion II? (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 06:28:52 -0800 (PST)
Before I got the Orion II I was greatly disappointed that it did not have a memory tuner. Now that I have it I see that it is probably irrelevant and in some cases advantageous to not have memories.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01234.html (9,152 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] Tuner and amp (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:07:55 -0800 (PST)
I think a 600 watt amplifier driven by 40 watss fits quite well into this requirement. It is actually 44 watts. John
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01302.html (14,316 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] Filter for SAle (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:05:29 -0800 (PST)
What advantages would Inrad's product have over Ten Tec's filter? Is it a price thing? Thanks, 73 John NA9U
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00099.html (9,987 bytes)

71. [TenTec] Third review on e-ham.net (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 07:13:59 -0800 (PST)
There is now a third review of the Orion II on e-ham.net: http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/5564 Another 5/5!! Though eham tends to be a love fest or hate fest you can glean quite a bit from interpo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00146.html (7,956 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] O2 shipments (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 07:54:49 -0800 (PST)
No, I don't believe that is the case. I was told, but I forget by who, that they are running a different set of rigs at the factory and will resume the Orion II's in late January. I don't think bugs
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00252.html (8,924 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] TT SDR Net New Time (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:29:03 -0800 (PST)
There were a bunch of guys on 7.2535 that were all wrapped around the axle about the TT SDR net this afternoon (1/8/06). They claimed that they were there first and had been there since 11:00 AM. I h
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00288.html (9,293 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] O2 keyer (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:01:54 -0800 (PST)
Ray, Have you heard others express this issue with the keyer? I have not and this may be a defective keyer on your unit. That is unfortunate but would not be systemic to the rig. Are others having th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00406.html (9,407 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] Web Site Down (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:30:34 -0800 (PST)
Here is what the Ten Tec Webmaster has said about this problem as of Dec. 27th. The contact us page is fine as are the driving direction pages. 73, John NA9U Ten-Tec Webmaster Dec 27 2005, 7:38 am sh
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00810.html (8,351 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Ships? (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:00:51 -0800 (PST)
Mid-February is when they expect to begin shipping the batch from the second run. I never got any notice of that, just heard it word of mouth. 73, John, NA9U
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00926.html (7,408 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] It's on the way! (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:23:18 -0800 (PST)
The Orion II is a bit different to use. If you come from older 80's technology it is quite a bit more different. Given the slightly longer learning curve and then the cost, it is quite reasonable to
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00950.html (9,938 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Hooking the coax to the open wire feeder presents a significant impeadance mismatch. Most open wire is 300 to 600 ohms and coax is 50 to 75 ohms. This would negatively impact power transfer. Since yo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg01003.html (10,794 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] Best Headphones? (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:50:05 -0800 (PST)
I just ran out and got a set of these at my local CVS $14.99 (Chicago metro area). They are marketed under a brand name of TDE Systems. They perform and sound like the Bose headphones, which is quite
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00787.html (9,922 bytes)

80. [TenTec] Orion II roofing filters (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:30:44 -0800 (PST)
For those of you that have bought or ordered the Orion II, which optional filters did you buy with them? I ordered all three but wonder if that is money well spent. Without the rig I'll be playing th
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00790.html (9,006 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu