Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:neal.laugman@gmail.com: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Symptoms of logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 01:21:22 -0600
This issue is a * dead horse * to me so this is my last post on the topic. Hi Terry, I don't know if you are waiting for NT0F to answer your post, but I'll try to explain. While there have been probl
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00462.html (9,714 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI 1st IF Narrow CW Filter Enable? (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:01:09 -0600
Don, Did you get the install instructions for the INRAD roofing kit? There are a couple different ways you can install it, one of which is to use N1 or N2 soft switches to activate it. The other way,
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00498.html (8,903 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI 1st IF Narrow CW Filter Enable? (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:17:31 -0600
Don, Do you have the instruction sheet? It can be wired to work off of either N1, N2, or full-time. If it was not using one of the narrow switches you would certainly notice it on SSB. I'm still tryi
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00513.html (10,346 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:38:30 -0600
Philip, Maybe no one has :) I have the older 234 so I wouldn't know, but I doubt that there is a lot of difference electrically. AFAIK the new one is an RF processor just as the old one is. -- Neal,
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00518.html (8,662 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Model 302 Encoder/Keypad (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:04:12 -0600
Keith, Was there any technical info that came with it - such as a schematic? -- Neal, NL7VL -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= __________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00532.html (8,761 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI 1st IF Narrow CW Filter Enable? (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:42:10 -0600
John, How cool! That's where I'd like to get for sure, but I'd try things out with the 2.4khz roofing filter first (since that's what I have). I was remarking to a friend of mine the other day how bo
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00536.html (11,074 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] 1253 Receiver kit (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 01:12:25 -0600
Bob, I built it when they first came out. You guys know I love TT, right? I gotta tell you that while I thought it was a clever way to get the job done, it was a piece of junk, as far as it's operati
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00043.html (8,249 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] FS: 282 and 285 CW filters (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 22:04:47 -0600
Hi Greg, Hey - do you still have your filters? -- Neal, NL7VL -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing l
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00058.html (7,789 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Battery charger (power supply Hercules II) (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:47:40 -0600
Jim, You are asking what kind of battery capacity you need to run the Herc from just batteries, or a PS + deep cycle in parallel? Maybe this is not what you what, but it might be useful anyway. * Wit
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00075.html (10,137 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Battery charger (power supply Hercules II) (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 16:20:52 -0600
Absolutely! I know that with CW you are actually looking at a 50% duty cycle but I'm not sure about SSB. A pair of 6 volt batteries will handle several hours of SSB at 100 watts, but we are talking
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00078.html (11,197 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] CorsairII notch potentiometer (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 03:52:18 -0600
Steve, I believe it's 250K, but I'll have to dig deeper on it. All the "old-school" Ten-Tecs use the same circuit with the RCA RC4136 quad op amp (which was low-noise and the best you could do back t
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00093.html (10,180 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] CorsairII notch potentiometer (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 04:05:21 -0600
Steve, The "Corsair" manual says 500K and all the component values are the same in the Corsair II. I put a meter on on of the pots in the Corsair II and got about 220K across both, but I think I'd go
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00094.html (10,308 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] CorsairII notch potentiometer (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:34:17 -0600
Hi Steve, So you're saying that the double-gang notch pot on the Corsair I is a 220K? That's about how it measured out with the ohm meter, but it does say 500K on the schematic. Jerry's right about t
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00118.html (9,056 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] CorsairII notch potentiometer (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:49:07 -0600
Yep. -- Neal, NL7VL -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00120.html (9,362 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] CorsairII notch potentiometer (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:03:30 -0600
O.T. for just a bit ... I thought it was amazing that my Leslie Model 147 with a 40 watt rms tube amp could easily keep up with the (new at the time) 100-150 Peavey amps or PAs. That 40 watt tube amp
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00129.html (10,177 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] CorsairII notch potentiometer (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 01:16:46 -0600
Charles, Are we talking about potentiometers, or just generally? It's alway been my understanding that the cleaner-lubricant formula for a pot is totally different from other cleaner-lubricants ... s
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00136.html (10,695 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] Audio equipment power and characteristics OT. (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 08:48:16 -0600
Jerry, That's quite a bit to digest, with a lot of it over my head, but I do see things I agree with and some things I had not realized. I'd like to make sure I get this if you don't mind. OK, so tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00143.html (16,590 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] Audio equipment power and characteristics OT. (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 13:29:41 -0600
Thanks Jerry. That certainly clears several things up. -- Neal, NL7VL <snip> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= _______________________________________________ T
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00152.html (10,634 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Why are so many dumping their OMNI VI Transceivers ???? (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:47:46 -0600
Hello George, Well - you're a bit late to the discussion, and I think it's pretty much a dead horse. But to summarize: Why are there more than one or two for sale? Who knows, but opinions are: 1) Coi
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00175.html (13,842 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] Why are so many dumping their OMNI VI Transceivers ???? (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:43:21 -0600
George, Otherwise you will just be giving in to paranoia. Now - back to the dirt-nap ... hi hi 73 -- Neal, NL7VL -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= _____________
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00200.html (13,298 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu