Mail Archive Search: <+from:neal.laugman@gmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:neal.laugman@gmail.com: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] Symptoms of logic board failure (score: 1): Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 01:21:22 -0600; This issue is a * dead horse * to me so this is my last post on the topic. Hi Terry, I don't know if you are waiting for NT0F to answer your post, but I'll try to explain. While there have been probl; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00462.html (10,160 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI 1st IF Narrow CW Filter Enable? (score: 1): Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:01:09 -0600; Don, Did you get the install instructions for the INRAD roofing kit? There are a couple different ways you can install it, one of which is to use N1 or N2 soft switches to activate it. The other way,; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00498.html (10,222 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI 1st IF Narrow CW Filter Enable? (score: 1): Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:17:31 -0600; Don, Do you have the instruction sheet? It can be wired to work off of either N1, N2, or full-time. If it was not using one of the narrow switches you would certainly notice it on SSB. I'm still tryi; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00513.html (11,438 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:38:30 -0600; Philip, Maybe no one has :) I have the older 234 so I wouldn't know, but I doubt that there is a lot of difference electrically. AFAIK the new one is an RF processor just as the old one is. -- Neal,; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00518.html (8,873 bytes)
45. Re: [TenTec] Model 302 Encoder/Keypad (score: 1): Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:04:12 -0600; Keith, Was there any technical info that came with it - such as a schematic? -- Neal, NL7VL -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00532.html (8,451 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI 1st IF Narrow CW Filter Enable? (score: 1): Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:42:10 -0600; John, How cool! That's where I'd like to get for sure, but I'd try things out with the 2.4khz roofing filter first (since that's what I have). I was remarking to a friend of mine the other day how bo; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00536.html (12,391 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] Replacment cw filter (score: 1): Author: Neal Laugman <neal.laugman@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:13:27 -0600; Hi Marty, Of course there is the alternative to spend as much as the rig is worth: http://www.inrad.net/home.php?cat=95 I have Inrad filters in several rigs, and I will probably get a filter like you; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00323.html (9,751 bytes)
48. Re: [TenTec] Replacment cw filter (score: 1): Author: Neal Laugman <neal.laugman@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:18:58 -0600; Rick, Hmmm - like all of us, they eventually wither away and die ... hi - and rodger on the KVG filter. Maybe Mike is right; just add on an audio filter. Even a passive LPF like KK7B designed for his; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00330.html (9,535 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 48
Page: [1] [2] [3]