Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nn6ee@yahoo.com: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] I Love the "ORION"!!! I just bought one! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:53:07 -0800 (PST)
Question to anyone knowledgeable: Electrically what is the difference in performance between the three types of filters used today, namely the "Mechanical", the "Ceramic", and the so-called "Roofing"
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00167.html (6,951 bytes)

2. [TenTec] ORION "Firmware Downloads!!!" (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:42:27 -0800 (PST)
Say Guys! Am I all alone in this problem??? I recently purchased an "ORION" and think it's a great rig but the INSTRUCTIONS on how to DOWNLOAD the subsequent revisions like Ver. 1.372 really SUCK!!!
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00728.html (7,277 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Re:ORION/Revision!!! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:39:02 -0800 (PST)
I finally got the proper information to do the DOWNLOAD revision to my ORION!!! The manual did'nt give any real information nor did another Website!!! I asked on a local reapter here in the BAY AREA
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00772.html (6,907 bytes)

4. [TenTec] Dumb question maybe, but......? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:16:06 -0800 (PST)
What is a "Orion Expansion Dongle"??? I'm a newbie to the ORION but it's one helluva rig!!! Jim/nn6ee __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamG
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00920.html (6,876 bytes)

5. RE:RE: [TenTec] Dumb question maybe, but......? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:02:03 -0800 (PST)
Thanks for the explanation Rich!!! Remember ALL: "There are no dumb questions only Dumb answers!!! (Or so I've heard!!!) But that's what's great about the "Reflector" is that thru out I've got nothin
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00923.html (7,645 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Advantages of computer control for s DX'er - N9DG's VHF+lineup (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:46:47 -0800 (PST)
Bill/W4ZV, Your statement about planes not being flown by a mouse & Keyboard are partially inaccurate. Take a look at the latest EURO-Airbus jetliner's latest flight controls/avionics setup, it can v
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00981.html (8,314 bytes)

7. Re:Re: [TenTec] Advantages of computer control for s DX'er - N9DG'sVHF+lineup (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:59:19 -0800 (PST)
Now Rog/K9RB I see your sarcasism poking thru but alas I don't think I'm really that much off base in that look at the TREMENDOUS point totals racked up by alot of the "Contesters" either participati
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00986.html (8,417 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Re:Re: [Ten-Tec Orion] QSK (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Tom-W4BQF, I could never go to high-speed CW using a Computer and a keyboard because to us if I can't do it manually then it's really not worth doing @ all!!! :-))) I'm fairly good @ 35wpm (sending &
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01029.html (7,408 bytes)

9. Re: Re: [TenTec] Re:Re: [Ten-Tec Orion] QSK (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:57:21 -0800 (PST)
Tommy, Yah I hear you about the FASTER stuff, though honestly I don't think @ this stage in my life the the Ol'Human-hard drive" could function at any higher speed anyway!!! :-))) But something that
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01068.html (8,236 bytes)

10. Re: Re: [TenTec] Re:Re: [Ten-Tec Orion] QSK (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:10:37 -0800 (PST)
Stuart/K5KVH, Thanks for the info!!! That's really incredible!!! At that speed to us it would be a BLURR!!! Jim/nn6ee __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam?
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01071.html (7,452 bytes)

11. Re:Re:[TenTec]Orion roofing filters (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 13:26:33 -0800 (PST)
Our OWN personal preference is to use the wider bandwidth filtering in a contest to find out who's out there in a contest and then if a certain station/contact is needed, then and only then would a n
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00125.html (7,729 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] firmware update issues please save (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 13:38:10 -0800 (PST)
Marty, We had a problem with the TT Orion firmware up-grade because it really was'nt SPECIFIC, and in that it SHOULD have said that after downloading the program to CLICK on your START button on your
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00126.html (10,708 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] firmware update issues please save (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 15:41:21 -0800 (PST)
Well excuse me BILL I did HAVE a problem!!! But now everything's COOL!!! But we're ALL not as SMART as you are!!! I guess??? Whatever!!! In spite of your un-friendly comments I DID IT!!! ____________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00135.html (14,027 bytes)

14. [TenTec] ORION (Firmware) question!!! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:38:04 -0800 (PST)
Gentlemen, This maybe a dumb question (I'm NO "Computer-Wiz") but could it be POSSIBLE for some nefarious/disgruntled Icom or Yaesu afficianaldo (or anybody else for that matter) to hack into the TT
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00153.html (6,883 bytes)

15. [TenTec] TT (Orion) Future improvements!!! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:51:22 -0800 (PST)
Gentlemen, In the future I hope that the Guys @ TT have the wisdom to offer "Hardware" improvements (when available) instead of offering a entirely new version of our Rig. Look what manufacturers lik
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00284.html (7,448 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] TT (Orion) Future improvements, Flex Radio (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:42:24 -0800 (PST)
N4LQ!!! That's my point EXACTLY in that the NEWER guys don't really understand that it's not about "GLITZ" it's about PERFORMANCE!!! I'm all for "New-Blood" getting into our hobby but where in the He
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00297.html (17,191 bytes)

17. [TenTec] TT ORION DISCUSSION (Future Improvements!!!) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:40:15 -0800 (PST)
My intial question SPURRED alotta great DISCOURSE and all of it was great!!! Thanks!!! I was well worth my query!!! Jim/nn6ee __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired o
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00367.html (7,194 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] New Rig Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:16:11 -0800 (PST)
Mark, I've been wondering about that one fact that you had mentioned about the software "reversal" of the keyer paddle function (software-wise) in that ICOM did that in my IC-756PRO!!! I'm sure that
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00375.html (12,193 bytes)

19. Fw: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:33:37 -0800 (PST)
Could someone tell me why TT's VEE-WIRE is only rated at 100w as anyone KNOWS sometimes an RF power of 100w just DON'T CUT IT!!! Jim/nn6ee __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mai
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00434.html (8,180 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:31:27 -0800 (PST)
Stu!!! Thanks for the heads-up as far as the "Vee-Beam" is concerned but remember also that NOT ALL OF US ARE BLESSED with a location as nice as yours!!! I've been going around with our local utility
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00439.html (10,622 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu