Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nn6ee@yahoo.com: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

21. RE: Fw: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:06:17 -0800 (PST)
Bill, WHAT DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND???? I SAID the location here is not that great nor is the LOCAL UTILITY NOISE PROBLEM!!! CONSIDER YOUSELF "DAMN" lucky!!! Earth to Bill??? ____________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00450.html (10,977 bytes)

22. Re: Fw: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:09:45 -0800 (PST)
Caity!!! I understand!!! But SOME OF US ARE'NT IN YOUR POSISTION!!! Like I'd mentioned to BILL consider yourself "DAMN LUCKY!!!" 88, Jim/nn6ee ** -- "Caitlyn M. Martin" <mizuhoradio@yahoo.com> wrote:
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00451.html (10,781 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] New LDG Tuners for Jupiter and Orion (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:35:21 -0800 (PST)
HMMMMM!!! I had a "internal antenna tuner" installed in my ORION when I bought it a month ago. But what I'm wondering is why the CHATTER in the relay while it's going thru the AUTO-TUNE process??? I
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00671.html (8,616 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] New LDG Tuners for Jupiter and Orion (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:12:48 -0800 (PST)
Thanks for the reply Jim!!! But you'd think that built in "America" would be comprable or BETTER then anything built elsewhere!!! __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00675.html (10,752 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] New LDG Tuners for Jupiter and Orion (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:36:21 -0800 (PST)
I don't know if SOME people are SLAMMING me out here because of my expriences with the ANT. TUNER as presribed by TT (and installed by THEM) but what I got IT BOTHERS ME!!! COMPRENDE??? If American R
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00703.html (14,023 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Comments from an ORION user (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 13:09:43 -0800 (PST)
Buck, I'm proud of you as it just goes to show HUMOR, even out here, is NOT DEAD!!! Fortunately the ORION nit-picking is rather sparse!!! Just goes to prove overall it's a damn great rig!!! _________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00198.html (10,102 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:20:06 -0800 (PST)
Jeff, I've had the 238B tuner for a couple of years now and the only thing I've got negative to say about it is the cheapy METER!!! It was NEVER ACCURATE to begin with and now it does'nt ever work. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00507.html (9,458 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Keyers? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Gary, I install the newest firmware rev. 1.372 here a few months ago and the ORION has performed flawlessly SO FAR!!! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam?
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00047.html (10,016 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Keyers? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
RON M'BOY!!! Well I said that because of some of the negative postings out here concerning the ORION!!! Like someone said "I don't like this" or "I don't like that!!!" HMMMM??? Well as we all know th
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00056.html (9,378 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] New Orion Owners (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
Really Tommy even as a "plug&play" rig it still would beat the pants off of all the others available!!! And besides buying the "ORION" is a heck of a better deal than spending $10,000 or more for any
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00142.html (12,460 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] real CW ops (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Grant! Nah you're WRONG! Real CW ops use a Iambic paddle if the really care about the proper spacing/intelligibility @ the other end. Rag-chews with a straight key are for youngsters, as nowadays my
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00143.html (8,150 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] REAL CW OPS (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
John, I was under the notion that only Catholic CW OPs practiced the "Rhythm-method"!!! :-))) Jim/ee ** __________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger Show us what our next emoticon should look
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00172.html (9,825 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] New Orion Owners (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Geeeezzzh Tommy lighten up!!! I was my own opinion and was'nt meant to RUFFLE your or anybody elses feathers!!! ** __________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger Show us what our next emoticon s
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00173.html (14,857 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] STOP! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 14:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
Tom/W0zr, Why not talk about CW here or anywhere else!!! It's an "Honorable-mode" and used by about 1/2 of all active Amateurs worldwide!!! When it's a slack time on the "Reflector" I've got no probl
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00259.html (9,646 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] STOP! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 14:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
Scott M'Boy!!! Could'nt have said it better myself!!! If anyone out here is planning on attending the "Visalia Intl. Convention this coming weekend we hope to meet you!!! Cheers, ____________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00262.html (10,084 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] YACWD and real CW ops (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 15:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Right On Rick!!! But with the messed-up FCC wanting to de-regulate OUR hobby even more with eliminating the 5wpm for GENERAL and leaving the 5wpm as is for the so-called "Top-License" it's a joke!!!
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00265.html (13,248 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] real CW ops (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 15:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Ron, By virtue of your POSTING you're causing it to continue!!! What don't you get about reality??? NO MORE POSTS! NO MORE THREAD!!! HELLO!!! Jim/nn6ee ** -- ron <roncasa@verizon.net> wrote: ________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00267.html (8,928 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] YACWD and real CW ops (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
Whatever Scotty!!! But remember our earlier EXAMS put us a QUATUM-Leap above CBers and "NO-CODE-TECHS" now!!! If you think the "HOBBY" is really worth trashing because some don't want to learn SQUAT,
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00270.html (9,581 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] YACWD and real CW ops (FCC) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
Ah the good ol'days!!! Remember them well!!! I took the General over at 555 Battery St. in SF back in 1963. And though I was completely prepared for the Tests I was still extremely NEVEROUS as everyb
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00307.html (9,027 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] Real CW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:36:47 -0700 (PDT)
Paul, I'd just love to see and hear one of these purported gentlemen who can copy Intl. Morse @ any speed above 45wpm, as frankly I think they're using a "COMPUTER" and not the ol' human-hard-drive (
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00389.html (13,995 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu