Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nn6ee@yahoo.com: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] TT (Orion) Future improvements!!! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:51:22 -0800 (PST)
Gentlemen, In the future I hope that the Guys @ TT have the wisdom to offer "Hardware" improvements (when available) instead of offering a entirely new version of our Rig. Look what manufacturers lik
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00281.html (9,018 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] TT (Orion) Future improvements, Flex Radio (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:42:24 -0800 (PST)
N4LQ!!! That's my point EXACTLY in that the NEWER guys don't really understand that it's not about "GLITZ" it's about PERFORMANCE!!! I'm all for "New-Blood" getting into our hobby but where in the He
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00294.html (17,984 bytes)

23. [TenTec] TT ORION DISCUSSION (Future Improvements!!!) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:40:15 -0800 (PST)
My intial question SPURRED alotta great DISCOURSE and all of it was great!!! Thanks!!! I was well worth my query!!! Jim/nn6ee __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired o
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00364.html (7,002 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] New Rig Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:16:11 -0800 (PST)
Mark, I've been wondering about that one fact that you had mentioned about the software "reversal" of the keyer paddle function (software-wise) in that ICOM did that in my IC-756PRO!!! I'm sure that
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00372.html (13,087 bytes)

25. Fw: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:33:37 -0800 (PST)
Could someone tell me why TT's VEE-WIRE is only rated at 100w as anyone KNOWS sometimes an RF power of 100w just DON'T CUT IT!!! Jim/nn6ee __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mai
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00431.html (9,344 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:31:27 -0800 (PST)
Stu!!! Thanks for the heads-up as far as the "Vee-Beam" is concerned but remember also that NOT ALL OF US ARE BLESSED with a location as nice as yours!!! I've been going around with our local utility
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00436.html (11,194 bytes)

27. RE: Fw: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:06:17 -0800 (PST)
Bill, WHAT DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND???? I SAID the location here is not that great nor is the LOCAL UTILITY NOISE PROBLEM!!! CONSIDER YOUSELF "DAMN" lucky!!! Earth to Bill??? ____________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00447.html (10,953 bytes)

28. Re: Fw: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:09:45 -0800 (PST)
Caity!!! I understand!!! But SOME OF US ARE'NT IN YOUR POSISTION!!! Like I'd mentioned to BILL consider yourself "DAMN LUCKY!!!" 88, Jim/nn6ee ** -- "Caitlyn M. Martin" <mizuhoradio@yahoo.com> wrote:
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00448.html (10,739 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] New LDG Tuners for Jupiter and Orion (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:35:21 -0800 (PST)
HMMMMM!!! I had a "internal antenna tuner" installed in my ORION when I bought it a month ago. But what I'm wondering is why the CHATTER in the relay while it's going thru the AUTO-TUNE process??? I
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00668.html (10,100 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] New LDG Tuners for Jupiter and Orion (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:12:48 -0800 (PST)
Thanks for the reply Jim!!! But you'd think that built in "America" would be comprable or BETTER then anything built elsewhere!!! __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00672.html (11,784 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] New LDG Tuners for Jupiter and Orion (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:36:21 -0800 (PST)
I don't know if SOME people are SLAMMING me out here because of my expriences with the ANT. TUNER as presribed by TT (and installed by THEM) but what I got IT BOTHERS ME!!! COMPRENDE??? If American R
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00700.html (13,908 bytes)

32. [TenTec] I Love the "ORION"!!! I just bought one! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:53:07 -0800 (PST)
Question to anyone knowledgeable: Electrically what is the difference in performance between the three types of filters used today, namely the "Mechanical", the "Ceramic", and the so-called "Roofing"
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00167.html (7,542 bytes)

33. [TenTec] ORION "Firmware Downloads!!!" (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:42:27 -0800 (PST)
Say Guys! Am I all alone in this problem??? I recently purchased an "ORION" and think it's a great rig but the INSTRUCTIONS on how to DOWNLOAD the subsequent revisions like Ver. 1.372 really SUCK!!!
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00728.html (7,483 bytes)

34. [TenTec] Re:ORION/Revision!!! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:39:02 -0800 (PST)
I finally got the proper information to do the DOWNLOAD revision to my ORION!!! The manual did'nt give any real information nor did another Website!!! I asked on a local reapter here in the BAY AREA
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00772.html (6,957 bytes)

35. [TenTec] Dumb question maybe, but......? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:16:06 -0800 (PST)
What is a "Orion Expansion Dongle"??? I'm a newbie to the ORION but it's one helluva rig!!! Jim/nn6ee __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamG
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00920.html (7,345 bytes)

36. RE:RE: [TenTec] Dumb question maybe, but......? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:02:03 -0800 (PST)
Thanks for the explanation Rich!!! Remember ALL: "There are no dumb questions only Dumb answers!!! (Or so I've heard!!!) But that's what's great about the "Reflector" is that thru out I've got nothin
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00923.html (7,592 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] Advantages of computer control for s DX'er - N9DG's VHF+ lineup (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:46:47 -0800 (PST)
Bill/W4ZV, Your statement about planes not being flown by a mouse & Keyboard are partially inaccurate. Take a look at the latest EURO-Airbus jetliner's latest flight controls/avionics setup, it can v
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00981.html (8,699 bytes)

38. Re:Re: [TenTec] Advantages of computer control for s DX'er - N9DG's VHF+lineup (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:59:19 -0800 (PST)
Now Rog/K9RB I see your sarcasism poking thru but alas I don't think I'm really that much off base in that look at the TREMENDOUS point totals racked up by alot of the "Contesters" either participati
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00986.html (8,243 bytes)

39. [TenTec] Re:Re: [Ten-Tec Orion] QSK (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Tom-W4BQF, I could never go to high-speed CW using a Computer and a keyboard because to us if I can't do it manually then it's really not worth doing @ all!!! :-))) I'm fairly good @ 35wpm (sending &
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01029.html (8,114 bytes)

40. Re: Re: [TenTec] Re:Re: [Ten-Tec Orion] QSK (score: 1)
Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:57:21 -0800 (PST)
Tommy, Yah I hear you about the FASTER stuff, though honestly I don't think @ this stage in my life the the Ol'Human-hard drive" could function at any higher speed anyway!!! :-))) But something that
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01068.html (8,526 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu