Mail Archive Search: <+from:nq5t@attbi.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:nq5t@attbi.com: 94 ]

Total 94 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] TCXO Alignment (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (nq5t@attbi.com); Date: Sun Jun 15 19:44:27 2003; As Jerry pointed out correctly, a while back, a TCXO is a Temperature COMPENSATED Crystal Oscillator, not an oven. Have no idea whether the TCXO remains powered when the radio is off, but it's going; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00499.html (8,615 bytes)
22. [TenTec] Orion TCXO Warm Up Drift (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (nq5t@attbi.com); Date: Wed Jun 18 11:35:55 2003; The spec is +/- 1 ppm at "room temperature" and +/- 3ppm "over temperature", which I presume means over the defined operating range of 0-50 degC. As far as "excursion" is concerned, the range would b; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00566.html (9,575 bytes)
23. [TenTec] Orion TCXO Warm Up Drift (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (nq5t@attbi.com); Date: Thu Jun 19 00:29:45 2003; I'll take a good receiver any day. Compare the rest of the specs.; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00595.html (9,039 bytes)
24. [TenTec] Orion TCXO Warm Up Drift (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (nq5t@attbi.com); Date: Thu Jun 19 01:32:31 2003; Sounds like a rigourous comparison .. Digging signals out of mud (wchich I take to mean attempting to get intelligence from a signal that is at .. and maybe a good bit of the time below .. the ambien; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00601.html (8,404 bytes)
25. [TenTec] Orion TCXO Warm Up Drift (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (nq5t@attbi.com); Date: Thu Jun 19 02:16:32 2003; It isn't mojo, it's physics. Side by side works fine, if there's a valid receiver characteristic that makes a difference. I'ts a brand-independent issue. Unless the issue is internal receiver noise a; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00605.html (9,388 bytes)
26. [TenTec] Buyer beware? (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (nq5t@attbi.com); Date: Sat Jun 28 22:54:08 2003; Yes. But only test that has any real validity is the A/B test he's just completed. Since he didn't do an A/B test of radio X with every radio on the list, there's no basis for a ranking. Seems to be; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00861.html (7,311 bytes)
27. [TenTec] Hello Orion Users (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (nq5t@attbi.com); Date: Mon May 5 22:09:47 2003; The relationship only exists because of the physical nature of how those two sensors on the sides of our head work. The distinction between audio and not-audio is irrelevant in this situation. As som; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00112.html (9,299 bytes)
28. [TenTec] Orion headphone jack (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (nq5t@attbi.com); Date: Thu May 8 17:20:58 2003; I have plugged a set of mono phones into that jack on a couple of occasions accidentally. The world did not come to an end. The radio did not blow up or smoke. In response to a previous post on this; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00204.html (7,926 bytes)
29. [TenTec] Orion Question (CW Tuneup) (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (Grant Youngman); Date: Tue May 13 19:03:45 2003; You may simply want to read the manual section on the TUNE button. Press TUNE and you will get carrier, reduced to about 20% of full output. If you then (or first) press PWR, TUNE will give you the c; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00323.html (9,966 bytes)
30. [TenTec] Orion Question (CW Tuneup) (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (Grant Youngman); Date: Wed May 14 06:22:34 2003; I had the discoussion with Ten-Tec right after my Orion arrived a the end of March. The current manual version is incorrect and incomplete on the operation of TUNE, and on the interaction between TUN; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00331.html (10,145 bytes)
31. [TenTec] Famous Ten Tec QSK & Orion (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (Grant Youngman); Date: Fri May 16 18:48:11 2003; The Orion hears between dots and dashes on the MAIN receiver at all speeds ( a little iffi above the mid-50's) ... at some point, it gets to be a bit academic anyway -- at least for me :-) The sub re; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00497.html (8,119 bytes)
32. [TenTec] Dayton Feedback?? (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (Grant Youngman); Date: Fri May 16 23:14:12 2003; Saw the pic. Truly one of the ugliest radios the Pacific has yet produced ... Grant/NQ5T; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00519.html (10,152 bytes)
33. [TenTec] IC-7800. (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (Grant Youngman); Date: Sat May 17 09:38:42 2003; Well, (no flame intended), I didn't find the discussion particularly thoughtful at all. In fact the gentlemen just plain got it wrong. The Orion display is clear, crisp, and informative. ALL of the i; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00533.html (9,909 bytes)
34. [TenTec] IC-7800 (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (Grant Youngman); Date: Sat May 17 12:53:42 2003; Can't we just get off this color thing? It's a pointless discussion. If someone wants to buy radio with color then let them eat cake. It won't hear better -- but if it floats your boat then by all me; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00539.html (12,747 bytes)
35. [TenTec] TT MoJo Alert - HIGH (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (Grant Youngman); Date: Sat May 17 13:43:01 2003; TT mojo? This is the T-E-N-T-E-C list -- contrary to popular belief that it has become the "see, we told you Icom would be the very bestest, and we'll all be happier if we send our dollars offshore"; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00543.html (7,683 bytes)
36. [TenTec] Orion Software v1.341 (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (nq5t@attbi.com); Date: Sun May 18 03:47:49 2003; Monitor audio is a bit low. Perhaps this will be in a firmware change somewhere along the line. In the meantime, just turn up the audio gain a bit. Grant/NQ5T; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00582.html (14,804 bytes)
37. [TenTec] In re color displays, etc. (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (nq5t@attbi.com); Date: Sun May 18 03:52:51 2003; Doesn't say much for hams, does it. Maybe the real winner will be the combo transceiver/datebook/GameBoy ... and something that you can play those .. uh, well, .. you know ... MPG and AVI files you c; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00583.html (6,737 bytes)
38. [TenTec] Re: IC-7800 Product Literature (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (nq5t@attbi.com); Date: Sun May 18 04:01:01 2003; And the 781 was an absolutely awful AM radio. Terrible on receive, truly lousy on transmit. Hopefully, the 7800 (or whatever they call the US version) will be better. The Orion is GREAT!! on AM, for; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00584.html (10,295 bytes)
39. [TenTec] An Orion Oops?? (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (nq5t@attbi.com); Date: Sun May 18 19:38:17 2003; That is a pretty big oops .. Easy to imagine how the person at the assembly station could grab the wrong connector, but not so easy to imagine how the error wouldn't get caught at the next step -- wh; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00620.html (7,784 bytes)
40. [TenTec] Rock-bound & snivlin' (was 60M) (score: 1): Author: nq5t@attbi.com (nq5t@attbi.com); Date: Sun May 18 21:30:02 2003; It's pretty simple really. This style of frequency assignment is typical of MIL channel assignments, MARS specifically. For MARS at least, the normal operating standard is to set the dial frequency 1; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00644.html (9,245 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]