Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nq5t@comcast.net: 741 ]

Total 741 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] Firmware 2.033 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:29:09 -0500
Only upgrade if: 1. You want the BW control on the subreceiver to work properly. 2. You want the MONitor to work in AM/FM modes. 3. You want the tweaks made to TGC, TX EQ and SP made in 2.033 Grant/
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00494.html (7,445 bytes)

122. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec (Mobile CW Paddle) (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 12:26:42 -0500
And probably no one can do it safely, unless you pull off to the side of the road. As much fun as mobile CW might be, I'm not sure I want to be driving in the immediate vicinity of anyone actually e
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00638.html (8,447 bytes)

123. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec (Mobile CW Paddle) (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 13:32:51 -0500
If it distracts you from driving, it isn't safe. I can't imagine how it would not do that. We also mostly tend to think we're invulnerable anyway, and that it's the other guy that has a problem, but
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00649.html (8,956 bytes)

124. Re: [TenTec] FT-2000 Webpage (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 14:16:17 -0500
Huh? What does that mean? Are yo implying that all of the iflters in the Orion aren't roofing filters (there is no Orion I)? Funny how well those "old design techniques" work ... Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00742.html (8,599 bytes)

125. Re: [TenTec] Orion II NR and Notch - Thoughts? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 22:33:08 -0500
You might want to just take a look through the archives of this list at contesting.com. There is enough reading material there on the subjects to keep you VERY busy for a while :-) Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00767.html (7,614 bytes)

126. Re: [TenTec] Orion II AT tuner question (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 23:46:32 -0600
I did the test earlier with the tuner adjusted for 80M, and found the same result on all bands. Some tests: (MAIN receiver only on ANT 1) (1)500 Hz BW, LCW, AGC off, RF gain low 50's. I set the tune
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00001.html (9,842 bytes)

127. Re: [TenTec] NEW SOFTWARE and other news (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 07:42:08 -0600
There was also something about a typing speed test being added for a special "digital" license, but that that test would be waved if you could simply whistle in PACTOR or Hellschriber at any speed .
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00005.html (8,108 bytes)

128. Re: [TenTec] Orion II AT tuner question (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 13:13:08 -0600
That would certainly explain a lot ... Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00019.html (8,245 bytes)

129. Re: [TenTec] Orion II AT tuner question (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 13:43:48 -0600
I think I just verified that. Tuned up MAIN, TX (VFO-A) on 1.8Mhz. Took an output reading at 28.0 Mhz on the SUB (VFO-B). Changed bands on the transmitter (VFO-A) to 28 Mhz, and the signal output on
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00026.html (8,606 bytes)

130. Re: [TenTec] Problem: Please confirm Orion II Radios (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 14:42:42 -0500
Everyone is a lot of people :-) It's independent of Sweep, independent of SP. If NB is ON and NR is ON, it's only necessary to press the NOTCH button to cause it to fail. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00044.html (9,582 bytes)

131. Re: [TenTec] Problem: Please confirm Orion II RadiosFIX!!!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:50:40 -0500
Curioser and curioser. I've tried both of the suggested homeopathic cures, and neither work. I think the Dr. is still needed on this one.-) Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00074.html (8,048 bytes)

132. Re: [TenTec] Problem: Please confirm Orion II Radios (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:21:20 -0500
Midflight would be a bummer. Sitting on the tarmac, though, a pilot "rebooted" an aircraft to try and clear a malfunctioning engine indicator of some kind. Would make me a bit nervous to think an ai
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00117.html (9,789 bytes)

133. Re: [TenTec] The Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 11:19:04 -0500
Aside from comparing to the factory spec, I wonder if anyone has run an actual respone curve on a 1.3x Orion? Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00171.html (9,050 bytes)

134. Re: [TenTec] The Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 11:30:48 -0500
Buy a bigger speaker :-) Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00174.html (8,999 bytes)

135. Re: [TenTec] The Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 14:07:43 -0500
And that's why "toll quality" audio, and radios that produce toll-qualtiy audio sound like cr*p. A rule of thumb is that the LF cutoff times the HF cutoff in Hz, should be about 400,000-450,000 to p
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00186.html (10,209 bytes)

136. Re: [TenTec] "The Bug" a/k/a Orion II Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 12:20:03 -0500
I don't think it's all that subjective or nebulous. My guess is that the reports of the v2/II audio not being "robust" may have a lot to do with the low end roll off. Can't comment on the "dynamic d
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00266.html (9,893 bytes)

137. Re: [TenTec] Orion V1 vs. V2 Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 17:23:06 -0500
Seems to me perhaps QRZ.com or eham might be a more appropriate place for bandwidth wars. We're talking here about performance, not whether anyone happens to think we all ought to talk through a str
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00282.html (7,696 bytes)

138. Re: [TenTec] Problems (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:37:10 -0500
Tell that to the guys who spent 10 G's on the Yaecoms, too. Let the radio which is without fault cast the first -- ah --whatever radios cast .. :-) Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00348.html (7,518 bytes)

139. Re: [TenTec] The Perfect Radio (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:20:11 -0500
I certainly remember that one. Haven't seen any ads in QST yet :-) Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00368.html (7,863 bytes)

140. Re: [TenTec] The Perfect Radio (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:35:42 -0500
It's still there .... http://www.computeradio.us/DR1.htm. Quite humorous :-) Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00384.html (7,771 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu