Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nq5t@comcast.net: 741 ]

Total 741 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TenTec] Question about updates (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:32:39 -0500
Sadly, that is not possible. Won't work. If I could get a 1.3xx load to run on my II, I'd be the happiest guy in Texas :-) Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00865.html (8,695 bytes)

162. Re: [TenTec] For Sale: Ten Tec ORION (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:36:30 -0500
Sorry -- that wasn't suppose to go to the list. Seems that's the second one of those mistakes made today :-) Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00867.html (9,768 bytes)

163. Re: [TenTec] Happy Orion owners (was question about updates) (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:46:05 -0500
Depends on your amp. Many modern amps still require close to 100 watts (carrier) for 1500 Watts out. The Orion II must still provide a minimum of 25 watts carrer with 100 watts PEP at 100% modulatio
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00868.html (9,703 bytes)

164. Re: [TenTec] Ver 2.033 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:27:52 -0500
Yes, read the archives.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00876.html (8,159 bytes)

165. Re: [TenTec] V 2.054 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:35:34 -0600
That's true. I still find using the CUT control as the simplest and most straightforward way of shaving off junk I don't want to listen to. One control, virtually no forebrain activity required :-)
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00017.html (7,082 bytes)

166. Re: [TenTec] Which one ? PRO III or Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:34:26 -0600
In what way? Leave a few firmware glitches behind, what makes it a better radio? This is a serious question, not a snide one. Curious why you think it's better. I presume you have or have had both?
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00071.html (8,056 bytes)

167. Re: [TenTec] RX EQ and TX EQ in 2055 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 14:02:20 -0600
Well, of course, anything in the code could be considered an "operational trait" :-) According to T-T, they removed an audio AGC function which was the source of increased noise, and that was at lea
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00082.html (8,383 bytes)

168. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:07:54 -0600
It's one of those things I was referring to in an earlier post. Some will love it, some won't care, some will hate it. The first and last groups will forever argue about why it's great or why it's n
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00091.html (10,269 bytes)

169. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:39:04 -0600
Obviously the former, if I can get it. I liked the 1.371 variant of NR better than the embodiment in the II in many respects. The downside, as I stated in my post, is the fact that the old version s
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00096.html (9,865 bytes)

170. Re: [TenTec] Distorted and "clicky" receive audio; Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:05:20 -0600
Ten-tec answered this question somewhere along the line. It is caused by the method of dynamically computing rather than pulling up pre-stored filter parameters. The mix of old filter and new filter
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00103.html (7,979 bytes)

171. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:23:16 -0600
So what did they say was "different"? Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00144.html (8,268 bytes)

172. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:25:51 -0600
Do you mean 2.031? Yes, why wouldn't it be? Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00147.html (8,466 bytes)

173. Re: [TenTec] Just did some testing with ALC (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:29:16 -0600
The visual I'm getting is the usual guy by the side of the road staring into the open engine compartment, expecting to spot the gremlin that caused the car to quit :-) Maybe a loose something, but I
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00149.html (9,547 bytes)

174. Re: [TenTec] Just did some testing with ALC (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 22:35:22 -0600
If it doesn't come on when you hit the tune button, it's probably a hardware problem. By the way, I have the cover off my II right now since I installed the 1800 and 600 Hz filters earlier this even
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00172.html (8,677 bytes)

175. Re: [TenTec] 2.031 QSK bug (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 01:43:49 -0600
Cute :-) I guess you're sure it's the radio and not the amp that's doing something hinky? So TX OUT is spuriously pulling low even though you aren't keying the radio? Or is getting stuck there? Is th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00179.html (9,493 bytes)

176. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 09:08:04 -0600
I found I had to re-EQ the radio and tweak the audio chain slightly from where things were set on my Orion, but can't say the audio doesn't sound "robust". I feed mic audio through a processor into
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00188.html (9,717 bytes)

177. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.055 Observations (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 10:23:37 -0600
I haven't seen anything definitive. It's still a guesswork exercise based on observed behavior. Bt it does seem that the notch functions may have been moved there, since there's no apparent affect o
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00195.html (8,891 bytes)

178. Re: [TenTec] 2.031 QSK bug - this is not a bug (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 13:30:45 -0600
His problem was that 2.031 seemed to "stick" with TX OUT pulled low keying his amp even though the radio was in receive mode ?? (Is that even possible?) I've been playing with mine using the loop on
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00211.html (8,213 bytes)

179. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 13:30:45 -0600
Amen! Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00212.html (8,232 bytes)

180. Re: [TenTec] OII TX Audio experiment/findings (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 15:21:39 -0600
You may want to check all of this on a second receiver. To see if it's something on your output signal, or just some distortion on the internal monitor. My experience and some other reports is that
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00219.html (9,503 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu