Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nq5t@comcast.net: 741 ]

Total 741 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] AGC Response 2.037j v 2.059d (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 17:35:29 -0500
They do not appear to have been relocated. Same behavior as in ealier v2/II releases. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00198.html (7,982 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.059d - TUNE bug? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 18:13:14 -0500
I'd say you have something else going on other than problems with the new software. I've been punching buttons on 2.059 for two days now with nary a "blue screen of death". 2. The only "fuzzy" audio
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00202.html (8,040 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Headphone Audio Levels (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 22:10:10 -0500
Haven't tried the AUX out yet, but the headphone output seems to be down in both 2.037 and 2.059. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00213.html (7,347 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] AUTO ANT SWITCHING BROKE 2.037j (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 22:14:02 -0500
Did you reset the antenna menu after loading the new software? It is working for manual band selection. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00214.html (8,126 bytes)

25. [TenTec] V2 Orion SPOT levels (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 09:27:37 -0500
Since this has been raised as an issue I made a comparison between 2.059 (v2) and 2.037 (Orion II) -- CW related. With NR on, I have to run the AF gain on 2.059 way up on CW. Listening to the same si
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00229.html (7,910 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.059d - TUNE bug? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:32:14 -0500
Yep. Whatever mode is in the sub receiver moves to the main. This does not appear to affect 2.037, only 2.059. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00232.html (7,439 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] [orion565] Blue screen of death 2.059 - continued (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:24:32 -0500
It sounds like you're wasting your time until you have T-T figure out what the problem with your radio is. Unless you just like beating yourself with a stick :-) Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00249.html (7,483 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] AM receive with v 2.037j (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 06:44:56 -0500
Someone is going to have to explain to me why this isn't indicative of a problem. Makes no sense why one would have to use hang and/or slow recovery on an AM signal for it to sound good. Don't get m
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00261.html (7,416 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] [orion565] 2.059d: CW audio distortion in right headphone (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:07:08 -0500
I actually get a bit of "fuzz" on one side. I just noticed it on the new v2. My right side may not be your right side, since I have to put the BinRX high pitch side on the right ear. And you're corr
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00275.html (8,456 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] 2.059d: BinRx still broken (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:07:08 -0500
I just checked it on my Orion v2 very carefully and it seems to be working fine. So not sure what you might be experiencing. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00276.html (7,938 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] 2.059d: BinRx still broken (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:07:53 -0500
Yes, Orion on v2. I put the cans on my head with low pitch to the left because I have low frequency hearing loss in my right ear but not in the left (or at least not as severe). It moves left to rig
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00295.html (8,347 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] [orion565] 2.059d: CW audio distortion in right headphone (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:08:07 -0500
I actually get a bit of "fuzz" on one side. I just noticed it when testing out BinRX on the new v2 (which is working). My right may not be your right. As an interesting observation, "left" and "right
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00296.html (7,922 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] V1.373b5 firmware (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:31:16 -0500
http://members.cox.net/wc4r/Orionfirmware.html Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00318.html (7,514 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Corrupted Display (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:35:42 -0500
Bug reports go to ditsnbits@tectec.com. See the last line here, for example: http://www.rfsquared.com/Updates/566 Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00319.html (8,530 bytes)

35. [TenTec] AM Output Level 2.037j (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:12:55 -0500
Has anyone figured out what's going on with AM transmit with the new release? I get a resting power out level in the 10+ watt range, with upward carrier shift with modulation (erratic with around 25%
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00338.html (7,923 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] AM Output Level 2.037j (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:14:17 -0500
Yes, that's correct. But the v1 put out a good, solid 25W of carrier. Although there was some shift. I was always able to set the drive to the amp and load to a full 1500 watts, and then see that 15
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00340.html (7,585 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] AM Ouput Level 2.037j (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:18:44 -0500
To follow up, now that the amp is cabled. As I suspected. I've never had a problem driving my amp to the legal limit on AM (arguably 375W carrier with about 1500W peak out). I now effectively have a
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00341.html (9,182 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] AM Ouput Level 2.037j (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 06:46:45 -0500
Not all amps have 4CX800A's or other low drive tubes in them. And I don't particularly want to go buy a new amplifier :-) Even a 1980's 100 watt analog rig can manage 1/4 peak output power for carri
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00345.html (8,396 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Orion II 2.037j NB glitch (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:05:18 -0500
It's working just fine here. I know that doesn't help much. But try again .... Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00384.html (7,630 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] [QRP-L] Value of used Schuur Profi? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:40:18 -0500
I bought a Profi 2 on that infamous auction house, and paid about $275 for it. The fellow selling it had purchased a Begali and no longer used the Profi. Like you, Duane, I then bought a Begali (Sig
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00409.html (8,154 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu