Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nq5t@comcast.net: 740 ]

Total 740 documents matching your query.

201. [TenTec] Icom 756PRO-3 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:17:58 -0500
Well, it was bound to happen. The latest upgrade to the 756 series radios -- 756PRO-3 The babblefish translation is rough. Looks like: - Added screensaver - Added "@" on CW - Added ability to run a "
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00909.html (7,375 bytes)

202. Re: [TenTec] Orion loss of audio (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:27:55 -0500
I'm running 1.371. Tried what you described (40 CW, A>B) with various audio routing options, with binaural on/off, with headphones and speaker, etc. Was not able to look at the Aux I/O connector Can
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00920.html (7,825 bytes)

203. RE: [TenTec] No Orion Update (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:21:15 -0500
That's hard to disagree with. I do wish in these long dry spells, that T-T would publish a "preview" of what's coming as they did with 1.370 .. for the rest of us. So at least we could tell if other
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00957.html (7,776 bytes)

204. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (especially NR operation) (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 09:02:00 -0700
The NR value adjusts the speed of adaptation, not the amount of NR. A lower value provides a relatively slow adaptation speed, so that once the filter is built it will tend to persist and will chang
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00111.html (9,150 bytes)

205. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (especially NR operation) (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 10:43:03 -0700
I forgot the obvious comment ... No, you do not need to cycle the NR off and on again if the signal changes. It will adapt on its own. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTe
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00116.html (9,969 bytes)

206. Re: [TenTec] Re: Roofing filters (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 10:48:16 -0700
I'm confused. I do not understand the concerns being raised. These filters are ROOFING filters. 99.94% of the time, it is not going to matter a whit that you have your SSB bandwidth set to 1.8 Khz,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00233.html (8,214 bytes)

207. Re: [TenTec] Re: Roofing filters (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:24:32 -0700
That wasn't what I was saying. Yes, sure the 1.8 Khz roofing filter is useful in contests or just 75M at night :-) Someone said they were going to stick the 1.8 Khz filter it in the 2.4 Khz slot (I
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00242.html (8,389 bytes)

208. Re: [TenTec] Orion Owners Try This (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:27:34 -0500
Indeed ... For a while this morning I was copying 10Mhz WWV on the MAIN(?) receiver. The VFO locked, and it wouldn't let me put a different outof-band address in there, but it was copying WWV pretty
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00491.html (8,460 bytes)

209. Re: [TenTec] Where do the filters go? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:47:47 -0500
The locations are clearly marked, once you get the cover off. There's already a 2400 Hz roofing filter in the stock radio. You won't gain anything significant by installing the 756. The 762 goes in t
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00510.html (7,778 bytes)

210. Re: [TenTec] re QST? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:23:03 -0500
I can't find it in there either. Sounds like a mistake on the cover, or possibly something got dropped at the last minute due to page limits. Grant/NQ5T a and "audio project equipment in they admitte
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00521.html (9,279 bytes)

211. Re: [TenTec] Where do the filters go (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:42:35 -0500
no On the other hand, the number of operators who run QSK CW at a bezillion WPM must be exceptionally small in the grand scheme of things.. (Anybody can SEND that fast. I can't copy much over 25 wpm
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00551.html (8,371 bytes)

212. Re: [TenTec] Digital Signal Processing (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:35:51 -0500
What? Mind does. Guess I must have received the "premium" firmware version :-) Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.conte
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00595.html (7,374 bytes)

213. Re: [TenTec] Yet another basic question (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 10:47:42 -0500
This is kind of like picking a wife .. no two people are going to have exactly the same preference :-) You need relatively HI-Z phones, 32 Ohms or more is recommended. I use a pair of 250 ohm Koss (
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00619.html (7,094 bytes)

214. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Support (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:41:16 -0500
Let's hope so, at least within reason. Unfortunately, Drake has stopped providing support, parts, repair, etc. for the former amateur line. Other than maybe some words of encouragement from Bill Fro
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00637.html (7,521 bytes)

215. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:52:58 -0500
I have to admit I prefer QSK on CW. But to take a sample from the T-T list seriously skews results from what may be the case more generally. Don't like VOX. Like a footwitch. ut ere are a ot of ahh
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00676.html (7,197 bytes)

216. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:33:22 -0500
Isn't that the truth :-) Not terribly long ago there were lengthy diatribes on here by some individuals who absolutely INSISTED that the Orion was worthless in a CW contest station because, at the t
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00695.html (9,471 bytes)

217. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:37:43 -0700
Somewhere in the dim past, such a device appeared in a QST article sometime in the 80's(?), with circuit boards available from A&A engineering. I think it was called SmartVox or something like that.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00714.html (9,701 bytes)

218. (Fwd) Re: [TenTec] Studio One Mic (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:23:56 -0500
The Studio One has a wide range frequency response. It has a lot of low end (more that the typical ham mic, and certainly more than a Heil HC-5, etc. cartridge). It may be that you have enough low e
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01073.html (7,499 bytes)

219. [TenTec] Re: [Orion] Orion No Receive (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:24:15 -0500
I'm not quite sure what "less critical" means in this sense. The NR setting does not affect the amount of NR, just the speed at which the NR adapts (how quickly filter parameters are changed). Highe
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01157.html (7,914 bytes)

220. Re: [TenTec] fancy new rigs (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:22:56 -0500
The fishfinder ... that's certainly one I hadn't thought of. Combine that with yesterday's question about "accordion sounds" and perhaps you could take a modern radio and play a rousing Polka while
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01180.html (7,565 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu