Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nq5t@comcast.net: 741 ]

Total 741 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [TenTec] Roof filters (N4PY and KC9CDT) (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:42:35 -0600
I'm convinced there's a bug in the code for the Sub RX somewhere. When you narrow the passband on the SUB, it (1) narrows from both ends or (2) narrows and shifts away from the low end at the same t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00730.html (8,662 bytes)

222. Re: [TenTec] "Sounds Sweet" (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:45:52 -0600
Hmmmm ... They've raised the price. Used to be $99. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00731.html (8,312 bytes)

223. Re: [TenTec] Roof filters (N4PY and KC9CDT) (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:24:21 -0600
Barry ... It has not been fixed in 2.032, presuming we're talking about the same problem, which we may not be. What I'm refering to isn't an EQ issue, it's a passband position issue. In SSB mode, wh
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00735.html (9,191 bytes)

224. Re: [TenTec] Where is Doug? (Was Roof filters) (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:10:31 -0600
He gives it away at the end of the essay :-) Pretty good .... Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00745.html (7,040 bytes)

225. Re: [TenTec] Roof filters (N4PY and KC9CDT) (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:32:16 -0600
Yes, I have. I'm going to send them another note, with this file attached. http://tinyurl.com/n82l2 It's hard to miss the fact that something is amiss :-) Grant
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00752.html (8,326 bytes)

226. Re: [TenTec] Speaking of Headphones (Orion) (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:17:27 -0600
It's set by the Sidetone volume. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00755.html (8,391 bytes)

227. [TenTec] Sub receiver bandwidth plots (was Roof filters) (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:41:08 -0600
Just an "I should have made that clear" comment, relative to the spectral displays in the document at the link, lest anyone incorrectly conclude the Orion II receive audio output is not flat. These g
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00773.html (8,539 bytes)

228. Re: [TenTec] [orion565] Orion Sub Receiver BW? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:26:41 -0600
The total bandwidth is 6 Khz. So you're only going to see 3 Khz of audio if you are center tuned on an AM signal and have PBT = 0. If you tune to one side or the other of the signal, or set PBT to p
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00789.html (7,652 bytes)

229. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:30:44 -0600
I agree with you, it would be nice to have an AM bandwidth limit considerably about 6 Khz total width. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00790.html (8,895 bytes)

230. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:31:52 -0600
I meant to say 'above" not "about".
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00791.html (8,650 bytes)

231. Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:57:55 -0600
But it isn't limited. Use PBT. You can get about as close to 6 Khz of AF response as you will with 12 Khz of bandwidth. And yes, it's only one sideband, but unless you're trying to squeeze every las
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00795.html (8,134 bytes)

232. Re: [TenTec] "Sounds Sweet" (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:42:50 -0600
Actually, pink (or 1/f, or flicker) noise has a lower high frequency content (relatively) than "white" noise. White noise has the same energy at every frequency. Pink noise has the same total energy
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00809.html (10,873 bytes)

233. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:12:58 -0600
No one is disputing the mathematics behind one sideband with carrier, and we'd all like to have a full 6Khz or therabouts per sideband. It's all true, and it's mostly totally beside the point. In any
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00811.html (10,329 bytes)

234. Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:15:54 -0600
Sinisa, you're almost always right. And you're right on the theory behind all of this, too. But in a practical sense, as a guy with a lot of AM SWL and ham band experience, it just doesn't matter th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00812.html (8,562 bytes)

235. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:42:13 -0600
(1) The R-390 is not totally an "old radio of the past". The A version was built well into the mid-1980's. I'm 6 years older than my much older than that "old radio of the past". Which makes me an "
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00816.html (10,076 bytes)

236. Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:30:50 -0600
I'd offer the following recent paper by Dallas Lankford as interesting reading. While it addresses specifically AM distortion caused by fading, there are some other useful points. If you're not into
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00858.html (8,915 bytes)

237. Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver -- Some results (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:39:49 -0600
Actually, that's not correct. Lankford adjusted the square law equations to the case of diode (half-wave detector) multiplying by the Fourier series for half-wave rectification. Some preliminary tes
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00859.html (9,348 bytes)

238. Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver -- Some results (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:26:15 -0600
He referred to it as % harmonic distortion, not THD. If you'd share the formula for one harmonic relative to the fundametal it would be appreciated. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00866.html (8,582 bytes)

239. Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver -- Some results (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:26:15 -0600
I'm going to play around with it some more tonight. I only ran at 50% for the quickie this afternoon. There's also a funny non-harmonic spur that shows up, just on the +PBT side of center, at about
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00867.html (8,943 bytes)

240. Re: [TenTec] Further Orion Sub Receiver -- Some results (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:39:02 -0600
Never mind. I have it. Sometimes it helps to share a bit more than "you're wrong", which is not very helpful in itself. Grant
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00868.html (8,519 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu