Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nq5t@comcast.net: 741 ]

Total 741 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [TenTec] Version 2.xxx (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:05:39 -0600
Did you try just turning up the gain? On the II it does not appear to be an issue. I've poked at both strong and weak signals. Wonder what the difference is? Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00533.html (7,095 bytes)

282. Re: [TenTec] V2 update... (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:29:09 -0600
If you load V2 and the sweep works, you HAVE the hardware mod. If the sweep does not work, you do NOT have the mod. There's a complete description of "how to", and options for T-T doing the mod if y
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00548.html (7,634 bytes)

283. Re: [TenTec] Orion I V2 Beta (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:39:03 -0600
I just checked it on my II, and it seems to be working fine. There is a significant change from 1 up through 9. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00656.html (7,818 bytes)

284. Re: [TenTec] Orion II manual / firmware for 565 / 8P with Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:02:47 -0600
It doesn't appear to be. There is still a very noticable frequency/phase difference between the two receivers when locked to a single VFO. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00673.html (9,157 bytes)

285. [TenTec] Transmit Bandwidth on AM (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:38:10 -0600
Can someone that still has an Orion with 1.372 or earlier software tell me if the SSB high frequency cutoff varies the AM transmit frequency response as heard through MON? There's a note in the Orion
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00674.html (7,247 bytes)

286. Re: [TenTec] Orion I V2 Beta Notch and AN problem (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:23:15 -0600
That also appears to be the case on the Orion II. Used to be on the Orion, for example, that if you turned the notch (AN or manual) on an AM carrier, the carrier would vanish and have no effect on A
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00680.html (7,710 bytes)

287. Re: [TenTec] Orion II manual / firmware for 565 / 8P with Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:26:54 -0600
Yes, maybe a little. My AM "reference" receiver is an R-390 with nice gentle L/C IF filtering, and a Sherwood SE-3 Mk III sync detector. The Orion/II isn't anywhere near THAT good, in overall qualit
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00698.html (9,887 bytes)

288. Re: [TenTec] 2054 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:44:11 -0600
For the record, I'm not knocking your opinion. But it is at least advertised as a "beta", and that should be a clue as to it's "fit and finish". Beta software from big guns who do NOTHING but softwa
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00705.html (8,166 bytes)

289. Re: [TenTec] Orion I update - serial cable? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:20:20 -0600
An RS-232/USB converter should work just fine. I use them all over the place, including the connection to the Orion. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00716.html (8,636 bytes)

290. Re: [TenTec] Orion I V2 Beta (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:19:11 -0600
Are you talking about the noise limiter or noise reduction (NR) or notch? I'm confused. Yes NR seems to work differently, but I've found it to be quite effective, at least on the II. The notch is de
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00726.html (7,829 bytes)

291. [TenTec] Request for check of Orion 1.3xx Behavior (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:03:31 -0600
I posted this last night, but didn't get any takers. Maybe everyone is already on 2.054B? I'm going to waste the bandwidth to try again. Would someone with an Orion still on 1.3xx firmware try the fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00734.html (7,546 bytes)

292. Re: [TenTec] Request for check of Orion 1.3xx Behavior - AM (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:33:12 -0600
Thank you (all of you who responded) very much. I'm not sure if this is no news or bad news. My presumption on the original is that the response could be opened up to about 3.9 KHz on each sideband,
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00739.html (8,637 bytes)

293. Re: [TenTec] Request for check of Orion 1.3xx Behavior - AM (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:44:55 -0600
Ron ... Thanks for that! I did a crude version of the same (I don't have a spectrum analyser kind of budget). I found low end response to be very good all the way down to 20 Hz. I took a single data
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00748.html (10,401 bytes)

294. Re: [TenTec] Hi Fi SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:40:57 -0600
Why not? If someone wants to run a wide-fi signal on an otherwise unoccupied frequency segment, why not? Clearly, at some point rules about interference and good practice, etc. come into play. But w
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00771.html (8,390 bytes)

295. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and Audio Peak Filter (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:45:04 -0600
Not sure what way you are expecting to be found. In DSP? Add-on internal to the radio? Aren't too many guys rewriting Orion DSP code in their kitchens :-) As a lot of people have said, there are a l
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00824.html (8,132 bytes)

296. Re: [TenTec] New Orion 2 manual (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:52:06 -0600
There is a separate document out there that lists the difference. http://radio.tentec.com/cms-files/566_manual_update_history.pdf
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00830.html (8,391 bytes)

297. Re: [TenTec] Orion1 Tuner on TX port 2 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:53:02 -0600
Do you have the tuner enabled in the TX menu? Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00833.html (7,780 bytes)

298. Re: [TenTec] Orion1 Tuner on TX port 2 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:37:08 -0600
No, sorry, I missed the Port 2 comment in the subject line. It only works on ANT 1 Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00849.html (8,984 bytes)

299. Re: [TenTec] O2_CW_SEND1_PROBLEM (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:50:44 -0600
There may be timing/priority issues, but I find it hard to believe that the CPU is overloaded. Maybe we just need to add some ten-tec RF boards to a Cray XT3 to solve the problem. It could probably
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00884.html (7,992 bytes)

300. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] Orion I firmware (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 15:04:43 -0600
You're absolutely right. It's the old story of "be careful what you ask for", because you might get it :-) The complaints about the delay in the V2 release for the Orion were getting pretty loud. Te
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00894.html (8,626 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu