Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nq5t@comcast.net: 741 ]

Total 741 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 08:48:31 -0500
One does have to take reviews on eHam with a grain of salt. One 2003 reviewer of the Jup (which definitely seems to be a love it or hate it radio after reading many of the reviews), indicated: "On tr
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00059.html (9,433 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:10:35 -0500
Thank goodness! :-) Sure would be nice to get a little preview of coming attractions ? Thanks ... Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00112.html (8,710 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:31:38 -0500
And don't forget: - SP performance - QSK (turnaround time) - AM receive bandwidth - SSB transmit audio bandwidth (or much better, just restore the whole transmit bandwidth scheme including SSB and A
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00115.html (9,080 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:28:18 -0500
Well, maybe it's necessary to think outside the box a bit. While it may not be possible to phase lock the receivers, perhaps it's possible to get a bit closer through a fixed (or variable) calibrati
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00133.html (9,822 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:56:22 -0500
One must wonder why T-T didn't do something like this in the original firmware -- and why they haven't done something about it in the interim ... Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00135.html (8,814 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] FS: 1208 6 Meter Transverter (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:30:12 -0500
That's Henny, not Kenny -- just to keep things straight :-) Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00173.html (7,744 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:34:21 -0700
That really isn't the way it would be -- more computer woes, that is, if by comparison one puts the "woes" of the Orions next to, say, the day-to-problems of running Windoze. If only my laptop would
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00262.html (9,985 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:30:31 -0700
Nothing, since it was used only as an example. In any case, I see no relationship between working with computers for a living and fretting about battling "computer" issues with a radio. Not quite th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00298.html (8,800 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:56:28 -0700
You make this kind of decision on one guys post? You deserve what you get ..... Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00322.html (8,796 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:17:48 -0700
The Orion III (or whatever it's to be called) will probably be at least that much, assuming the wish list I've been reading here gets implemented. (I haven't seen anything about hyperspace comm chan
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00324.html (9,944 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] Dial drag adjustment (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:33:56 -0700
If you can't manage to get it right by rotating the skirt, you can simply adjust the position of the knob on the shaft to get the drag where you want it. Just slide off the rubberized covering over
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00383.html (7,943 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] AirPax Purchase (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:37:16 -0700
Why is it I sense a totally irrational state of panic over this whole Airpax debacle? Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00458.html (7,586 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] SDR 1000 vs Orion vs SDR-X (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 09:36:34 -0700
Why is it these discussions always manage to come down to some smart remark about young (and bright, smart, and eager, and not afraid) versus old (stodgy, stupid, fearful, and still waiting for Elvi
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00483.html (9,796 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] SDR 1000 vs Orion vs SDR-X (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:32:35 -0700
Actually, for the last few days (based on a quick survey of message subject lines) it's been quite more off on a tangent regarding Flex, the SDR-X, and how T-T will surely be out of business soon ;-
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00496.html (8,238 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] How handle DUST? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 05:17:00 -0700
I keep a small natural fiber (wool, I think) duster in the shack and just give everything a quick one over maybe once a week. Dust collects on the top surfaces of knobs and and anything else horizon
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00510.html (8,833 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] Is Orion really worth it? Given the published problems? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:02:06 -0700
You have to remember that these reflectors tend to be very closed communities, and there are some very opinionated folks (which isn't to say there is anything amiss with their opinions). The most op
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00526.html (10,717 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] Is Orion really worth it? Given the published problems? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:02:12 -0700
That is very much the way it is. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00548.html (10,422 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] Is Orion really worth it? Given the published problems? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:54:33 -0700
Actually, the "competition", for many of us who have raised concerns with the II/v2, is not some other radio, but the v1 Orion. There's all the stuff that Ron Castro captured on his list. Plus the f
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00567.html (9,989 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:43:47 -0700
According to the JARL webpage it's 1KW (peak power delivered to the antenna) and then drops at 50 Mhz and up. Which is probably why the PW-1 and Quadra are nominally rated at 1KW (although they will
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00597.html (8,071 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] Fwd: Is Orion really worth it? Given thepublishedproblems? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:51:18 -0700
Even the guys around here (me included), who whine and complain about this and that and have our favorite things to pick on, don't have our radios up for sale :-) Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00598.html (8,506 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu