Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:o2@longwire.com: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Lightning Strike Results... (score: 1)
Author: Larry DiGioia <o2@longwire.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:44:37 -0400
After my hit, Ten Tec was never able to keep my Omni VI running for more than a month. It was back and forth 4 times before I traded it for an Orion II. -- Larry N8KU l o n g w i r e . c o m HF - DX
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00238.html (10,991 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Larry DiGioia <o2@longwire.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:50:31 -0400
Also, yahoo is less than trustworthy when it comes to divulging your email address to spammers. And as you may have seen, the lists themselves are regularly penetrated by spam. -- Larry N8KU l o n g
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00223.html (8,096 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Config help. Orion - Writelog - Windows XP (score: 1)
Author: Larry DiGioia <o2@longwire.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:26:49 -0400
In Writelog, ("ports") assuming COM1 is connected to your rig, you want: COM1 - no CW - no DVK - rig=Ten Tec Orion - Baud=Auto - "Poll" checked - Comm PTT=no Then I have COM2 communicating with my Ri
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00254.html (8,131 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 56, Issue 11 (score: 1)
Author: Larry DiGioia <o2@longwire.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 20:33:00 -0400
Now you've done it. Don't let Kurt hear you say that. Interestingly, he just addressed a similar issue in his last column. I am a user of random length dipoles and truly balanced tuners. I am 8 count
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00165.html (7,633 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII, Antenna tuning, etc. (score: 1)
Author: Larry DiGioia <o2@longwire.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:03:44 -0400
Good tuners, that will work on 80 and 160, will by necessity, consist of at least (1) large, expensive, roller inductor, and at least (1) large, expensive, variable capacitor. Really good tuners may
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00223.html (11,218 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] do any ten tec radios excel on longwave AM Broadcastband? (score: 1)
Author: Larry DiGioia <o2@longwire.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:51:53 -0400
I think it's great, so much so that I got rid of my Drake R8B. -- Larry N8KU l o n g w i r e . c o m HF - DX - CW - Digital _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00318.html (11,249 bytes)

7. [TenTec] signal (score: 1)
Author: Larry DiGioia <o2@longwire.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:29:16 -0500
Sorry for the off-topic, but you guys are the ones who would know - Does anyone know about the signal a little above 10.100 MHz, that is on nearly 24 hours a day? Just inside the band. I used to thin
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00417.html (6,622 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability (score: 1)
Author: Larry DiGioia <o2@longwire.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:07:32 -0500
OK, I brought this up before, and was specifically told that "low RF gain and high AF gain," as is traditional in analog radios, does not apply to the O2. Personally, I like to leave the RF gain at 1
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00644.html (9,070 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability (score: 1)
Author: Larry DiGioia <o2@longwire.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:34:16 -0500
I am grateful for this list, and now I only wish that the engineer who gave him the advice had bothered to put it in the manual. -- Larry N8KU l o n g w i r e . c o m HF - DX - CW - Digital _________
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00651.html (18,747 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability related question (score: 1)
Author: Larry DiGioia <o2@longwire.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:44:14 -0500
Same here, and same result. I am the one who started the thread. However, I should point out that when it started, we were talking about the O2. I am now quite convinced that for everyday CW DXing, t
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00061.html (10,176 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] RF processor (score: 1)
Author: Larry DiGioia <o2@longwire.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 07:09:39 -0500
Any time I see something like this, my first thought is, "if it's so simple to do, and works so well, why don't manufacturers just build them in?" -- Larry N8KU l o n g w i r e . c o m HF - DX - CW -
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00246.html (7,867 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu