Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:pa5mw@home.nl: 89 ]

Total 89 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:26:31 +0100
The Orion (565) was never ever tested with the optional INRAD 600Hz filter (designed by W4ZV) . This 4-pole crystal is the perfect roofing filter with minimal Group Delay.  6 or 8-pole filtering, use
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00058.html (16,261 bytes)

82. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:37:13 +0100
Tnx, Still own 3 TT ORIONs here: - Old 2002 version, recently acquired(swapped for my OII), heavily used (has at least different PCB circuit tracks around the DC power input) using fw 1.375b - New bo
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00060.html (21,175 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:12:57 +0100
Hi Kim, Yes, on my SDR Perseus I have lowered them to the minimal value (32) to make it perform better. For the ORION that is not necessary. However, I did experiment with taps on the OII a bit. You
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00063.html (25,551 bytes)

84. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:12:50 +0100
Just to be clear on this; the ORION does not require lowering the filter taps setting at all. First its basic filtershape at 199 is already perfectly analog-like round shaped (see my previous weblink
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00066.html (27,299 bytes)

85. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:21:57 +0100
Hi Martin, Maybe it is different at fw 1.373b5 ?? Anyway; I can dig out weak signals on 160m best at 100Hz BW. At 100Hz I can slowly tune the whole band without feeling restricted by any artifacts or
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00068.html (30,941 bytes)

86. Re: [TenTec] list opinion(s) on Omni VII and/versus Orion (score: 1)
Author: <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:30:55 +0100
The russian navigation beacons are on 160m active and just appear in the noise (1813.1) I just compared my both ORIONs using that exact CW-like signal : ORION serial ending 4 (inc RX366)Fw V3.32: wea
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00071.html (35,742 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] RX366 Query (score: 1)
Author: <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 08:02:10 +0100
https://tentecwiki.eqth.net/doku.php?id=rx366adjust 73 Mark PA5MW If you select the same VFO for both receivers, they will be precisely locked for diversity reception. Gary phase locked. I have the O
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00078.html (8,630 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs Orion II DSP Filters (score: 1)
Author: <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 08:18:48 +0100
Just to clarify something here; because I like the 100Hz BW at fw 1.x better than at 3.x does not mean the generation 3 fw is not good or anything. There is a world of differences between 1.x and 3.x
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-12/msg00079.html (10,091 bytes)

89. Re: [TenTec] Version 3.033xd July 9, 2013 (score: 1)
Author: <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:25:31 +0200
Original supplied 'How to' yxt file: pdating the FLASH FIRMWARE on Ten-Tec Orion Refer to "74474 Orion565n566 User Manual Addendum V3 Firmware.pdf" for more details on Version 3 firmware, and the RAM
/archives//html/TenTec/2019-08/msg00039.html (11,322 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu