Mail Archive Search: <+from:paulc@mediaone.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:paulc@mediaone.net: 204 ]

Total 204 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RE: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 08:09:30 -0500; The operative word here is "reasonable." Al, I don't disagree with your statement in the least, but for most of us, securing a vector signal analyzer simply isn't an option for our measurements. -Pau; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00005.html (9,479 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Orion Anodized Face Plate? (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 06:36:32 -0500; Since Ten-Tec has led the way in the use of aluminum during its entire products' history, I suggest something completely radical for the Orion... How about an anodized front panel with a choice of an; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00047.html (10,759 bytes)
3. [TenTec] RE: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 06:46:42 -0500; Nice work George. It appears that the 10 Hz change is indeed detectable with the waterfall display. Now, we just need to apply it to a strong signal with microchirp. Looks like the resolution with Mi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00048.html (13,821 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Pegasus/Jupiter keying - In search of Perfect CW :-) (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 07:37:05 -0500; I'm not sure of the methodology, but I recall a graph from a Navy study in which keyed envelope shape rise/decay was plotted against minimum discernable signal strength. Another graph depicted CW sp; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00080.html (12,209 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Pegasus/Jupiter keying - In search of Perfect CW :-) (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 10:31:43 -0500; Agreed 100%. With narrow filters, I notice no difference regardless of rise/fall time. The filtering rounds the edges and extends the rise/fall time. However, under MDS conditions, I almost always u; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00083.html (11,073 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Re: FYI - key click thread on Ten-Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 21:16:12 -0500; If you go to the Topband archives on contesting.com, there's been a very good discussion running recently concerning key clicks and as you mention Steve, the ability to hear what's always been there; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00004.html (16,473 bytes)
7. [TenTec] rx-340 TX/RX combos (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 11:10:30 -0500; I own both. You can see my RX-340 and Omni Six Plus at: http://www.qrz.com/database?callsign=w9ac The RX-340 is superior to the Omni Six on the ham bands...period. The RX-340 is seemingly impossible; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00087.html (9,178 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Re: [TenTec] (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:57:08 -0500; The CW speed has no bearing on the Omni's CW note. Go back and re-read the reflector archives in 1997 and 1998 for a complete discussion of the issue. Thanks. -Paul, W9AC; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00299.html (7,307 bytes)
9. [TenTec] ORION - coming in 2002 (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 13:07:49 -0500; Amen... still; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00464.html (10,523 bytes)
10. [TenTec] 516/Orion/"software defined"/etc. (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:19:58 -0500; I thought that in the '80s, Ten-Tec had quite a few offerings happening simultaneously or very close apart. I'm thinking of the Delta, Corsairs, Omni D-B/C...Argo 505/509/515, Argosy, C21, C22, Trit; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00516.html (9,558 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:49:24 -0500; You can't. In fact, I know of no electronic instrument capable of reasonably detecting it. Sometimes the ear is the best judge. The keyed waveform oscilloscope display has no association with frequen; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00558.html (17,076 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 21:57:35 -0500; Some good points Jerry. Provided that the audio spectrum analyzer is fast and capable of displaying resolution of less than 10 Hz, it may be of some use. Regarding the use of an audio oscillator agai; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00564.html (9,050 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 07:17:34 -0500; Correct to the extent that CW bandwidth may be minimized. I don't necessarily agree with Tom's view that the "correct" CW waveform is one in which the transmitted bandwidth is minimized by extending; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00586.html (10,223 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:15:41 -0500; Some TR7s and C-Lines sound exceptionally good. I still recall the sound of Paul, K4CA who used a T4XC modified for QSK. I once looked at his waveform to see what was happening and it was a mirror im; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00590.html (13,255 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Tentec540 (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:18:28 -0500; Gosh, I don't know about that Steve. I recall a guy in Lexington, KY who came up with a great sine-wave sidetone mod for the Tritons and Omnis. It sounds so good on my Triton that I consider it a "mu; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00591.html (8,520 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Pegasus and "The Middle Finger" (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 21:09:54 -0500; The strangest thing just happened to me tonight while I was operating my Pegasus.... As I was cruising down the 20-meter band, I decided to put the mouse cursor over the tuning slider. As I did, I no; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00047.html (7,206 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Evolution (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 12:37:04 -0500; The Omni Six has already celebrated its 10th birthday and, amazingly, it's still in production. With few exceptions, what other transceiver can claim a successful ten-year production history? I am ho; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00153.html (9,888 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Evolution N4PY (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 19:54:53 -0500; Teamed-up with the N4PY software, the RX-340 is substantially better than the Omni Six in both features and performance, and with a $4K price tag...it should. For those interested, I have a review o; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00163.html (8,134 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Omni VI+, Henry and QSK-5 (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 18:55:25 -0500; Jim, Based on your description of the operation of the QSK-5, I am guessing that the following interconnections "should" work: QSK-5 OMNI 6 AUX <==> TX EN KEY 2 <==> TX OUT It would appear that KEY 1; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-11/msg00056.html (12,087 bytes)
20. [TenTec] Omni VI+, Henry and QSK-5 (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 19:10:28 -0500; I went to the Ameritron web site to download the QSK-5 manual. Instead, a model QSK-5PC is shown and apparently the connection choices are much different. Oh well.... -Paul; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-11/msg00057.html (11,521 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]