Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ranchorobbo@gmail.com: 97 ]

Total 97 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] bringing up an old amp (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:28:09 -0500
when you get 3-500s from rf parts they tell you to let them idle with the filaments on for 12 hours before any transmitting. Clark, you mentioned L4B chimneys--not sure if you are looking for them or
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00328.html (8,275 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] K4VUD & Titan 425 (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:37:46 -0500
Ron, you go on at length about Charles's so called "rant" which I have read, and then you don't expect comment following your post? That seems disingenuous to me. As for Charles, he should have poste
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00462.html (7,879 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] So long (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:30:30 -0500
<<<I have to say they've been good to me. So far they've fixed all that I've sent them and are now sending me back my 20+ year old Paragon on a warranty repair following service for a PLL problem in
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00536.html (8,017 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] SB-220 Tubes and QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:36:39 -0500
<<<Can you measure 20% at the other end of the path? That's all of 0.8 dB and when propagation changes sometimes more than 10 dB in seconds... 73, Jerry, K0CQ>>> Hi Jerry, The next time you fork out
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00539.html (8,070 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] SB-220 Tubes and QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:41:44 -0500
Hi Jerry, It's not about dBs; it's about paying your money and expecting a certain level of performance and having the product deliver that. You don't _have_ to run it flat out, but in the case of am
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00553.html (8,995 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] SB220-Tubes and QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:57:55 -0500
Hi Chuck, Yes, you are right--you are of course referring to Ampfet 50 no. 2; no. 1 went to CBA in New Brunswick. Also, when I wrote that no 50 Kw AM in the u.s. runs a tube primary I had in mind the
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00580.html (8,235 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] So Long (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:04:11 -0500
Okay Joel, FB--I'll take your word for it but I think you're being a bit modest, hi hi. 73, rob / k5uj <<<Rob, Thanks for the kind words, but not sure my name is quite a household word, especially at
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00581.html (8,062 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] SB220-Tubes and QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 18:32:26 -0500
Hi Chuck, We've pretty much veered off from ten tec gear so I'll sign off by saying that I think at this point, the problem with a marketable s.s. ham amp is that several areas in the design start ge
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00028.html (9,958 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Anyone using W2ihy products on omni 6 with goodresults? (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 18:49:01 -0500
That might be okay for the Orion 2 but for a stock Omni 6, I don't think much of anything extra is needed at all. Here's why: the rig's tx bandwidth is roughly from around 300 hz up to 2.7 Khz. If it
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00030.html (7,869 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Anyone using W2ihy products on omni 6 with goodresults? (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 12:25:37 -0500
Thanks Bob--HI Barry, I considered that, (your point) when I thought about my answer to the original question. Many eq users settle on a boost/cut contour that boosts the high and low frequencies and
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00054.html (8,847 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Titan III (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 13:03:45 -0500
I'll bet Ameritron makes and sells more amps than all the other American manufacturers combined. I got ceramic tube amp fever a couple of years ago and wanted a Command HF-2500 real bad but I didn't
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00056.html (8,388 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Titan III at 100% d.c. (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 18:29:06 -0600
<<<N.B. I might be willing to accept a 2 x 3cx800 amp if I wanted to operate 100% duty cycle mode at reduced power. ** Why would you need to reduce the power level when you are generating 1500 watts
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00122.html (8,283 bytes)

13. [Amps] Peter W. Dahl Company (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:45:07 -0600
I have received word that Peter W. Dahl Company is going out of business effective 31 December. I have no confirmation of this. Does anyone know if this is true? Thanks & 73 rob / k5uj ______________
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00175.html (6,388 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] OMNI6 PLUS Alignment procedure needed (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:57:18 -0600
Warning: In the Omni 6 manual, there are a couple of errors in the designators for some trimmer caps that adjust things like the carrier set point and the cw tx frequency (so it is on the display fre
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00782.html (7,857 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] OMNI6 PLUS Alignment procedure needed (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 15:47:05 -0600
Hi, I did some digging in the reflector archive and I found that in some of the older manuals the the tx audio board trimmer caps that adjust all the BFO frequencies for SSB, cw, and other modes, are
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00820.html (9,134 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Live and Learn (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:05:11 -0600
hi, I learned a few years ago to avoid all of the new gee whiz ways of payment. I state right up front in any of my listings that the buyer has two ways of paying: U.S. Postal Money Order or check. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00364.html (8,795 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Live and Learn (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:24:39 -0600
Thanks Bob; I apologize Carl--I guess I did not get a good understanding of the situation before I responded the first time. I won't comment on the electronic payment systems as I guess I just had ba
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00368.html (8,792 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238A settings? (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:53:59 -0500
I recommend that you don't use the ten tec tuner (which I do use for unbalanced feedlines, and it is very good for that--I am a big L network fan) and instead tune the 600 ohm parallel line directly
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00110.html (7,547 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238A settings? (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:37:12 -0500
As someone else wrote, take a look at the Rich Measures article. http://www.somis.org/bbat.html The price of the Palstar isn't too bad for what you get; I think it's around the price of a new 238B. B
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00117.html (8,057 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238A settings? (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:49:59 -0500
you have the original palstar bal. tuner; they changed the design and put the inductors on a common shaft so they do not depend on a belt to stay in sync. but beyond that I don't know if the matching
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00123.html (9,069 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu