Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ranchorobbo@gmail.com: 97 ]

Total 97 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] What about antenna wire? What to buy? (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:57:34 -0600
1. Higher power handling materials and equipment are usually better made and will last longer. 2. They are stronger and can handle rough conditions better. 3. They may be more efficient and have a wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00296.html (9,079 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] ant (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 20:04:10 -0600
My experience has been the full opposite but not with the 275 w. model. I own two KW Matchboxes and use them with center fed 80 and 20 m. halfwave dipoles. I bought one on-line and the other at a ham
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00387.html (11,538 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:57:50 -0600
Right. Which gets us to the basic question everyone has to answer for themselves if any of this bothers them: Am I willing to pay for a throw away plastic rig in order to get all kinds of cool extras
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00457.html (10,557 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc. (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:48:12 -0600
I used to think the old boatanchors were merely a nostalgia trip for people who want to live in the past but I was mistaken. There are some modes (if you ragchew) for which the Collins A line, Johnso
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00061.html (8,864 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs any other (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:18:29 -0600
What does a "luscious" receiver sound like? <<<Goodness... I have always thought ham radio signals were "fatiguing" to listen to no matter what receiver I was using. Ham signals are INHERENTLY noisy,
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00444.html (9,407 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] [Amps] TenTec Centurion - 422 tuning question (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:33:52 -0600
<<< I am not completely familiar with the Centurian, but most amplifiers number their load controls from 1 to 10 and from left to right. That being the case, the maximum load value (in pf) should be
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00488.html (8,064 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] TenTec post acknowledgement (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:46:51 -0600
Sorry, wrong reflector. Rob K5UJ
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00489.html (7,473 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] link coupled tuners (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:08:12 -0600
<<< Jerry, we all prefer a link coupler tuner. Unfortunately there are no commercial units available anymore, at least not in the amateur radio market. Most of the old Johnson Viking matchboxes on th
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00188.html (10,557 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:21:43 -0600
I once wound 100' of 213 on a small plastic garbage can 1.5 feet diameter and used it as a c.m. choke on 160. I calculated the Xl was over 2000 ohms (I don't remember the exact figure) and the diamet
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00248.html (8,845 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:10:38 -0600
It certainly is true that the ferrite core c.m. chokes have much more pure resistance and are useful over a very wide range of frequencies compared to a large coil of coaxial cable (a.k.a. air core c
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00257.html (9,492 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 20:56:58 -0600
Steve, I'm not sure why you want to keep beating on a point no one is in disagreement with you over but okay, whatever. <A Resistive choke will *always* reduce CM currents; a Reactive choke may <<<*I
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00274.html (8,957 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:42:02 -0600
JIm, take a look at the information in this source: http://www.w8ji.com/balun_test.htm You will see what we all agree on, that the solenoid choke has almost non-existent pure resistance except on cer
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00343.html (8,430 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] Titan 425 Initial Tune-Up settings - high VSWR (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:15:26 -0600
Hi Gary, You never said what your load Z was but it together with your feedline length could require more inductance in the amp's pi network. Once you adjust the "tune" and "load" caps for maximum ou
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00387.html (10,950 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor antenna (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:54:02 -0600
I think it is a real shame that things have reached the point where we hams have to put up these sneak antennas, as if we are doing something illegal, or operating spy stations in enemy terretory. Th
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00481.html (10,232 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] OT indoor antenna (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:54:04 -0600
<<<We are now thinking of have one of the local hams (who works for the power company) stop by another ham's condo and hook up a wire antenna from the peak of his condo unit to a utility pole, lettin
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00549.html (7,382 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] tuner, OT (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:40:53 -0500
If you are looking for any _manufactured_ L network tuner, keep an eye out for a Collins 180S-1, probably the best manufactured L network tuner for hams ever made. 73 Rob K5UJ
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00343.html (6,915 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] 2.8 filters and Omni V...just won't work (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 07:13:09 -0500
Jerry is right about the trimmers. The Ten Tec analog rigs that came out after the Corsair 2 were not designed for anything but CW and contest SSB that sounds like you are operating a cell phone on t
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00360.html (9,151 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] Looking for "cheap" rig or honest and patient ham (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:04:07 -0500
Why limit your advice to Ten Tecs and JA plastic radios? If the guy wants to operate CW there is a rich array of vintage rigs to choose from that also offer the chance to do some restoration, thereby
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00034.html (9,385 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Headphones for ORION I? (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:25:31 -0500
It's irrational to end an entire discussion because of some out-of-line juvenile denigration of one ham's "audio" qualifications when he is not here to defend himself. I have never heard an Orion 1 e
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00167.html (10,234 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] Oscilloscopes more questions (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:42:00 -0500
fold, staple and mutilate this into a thumbdrive, print it out, or somehow hang on to it for safe keeping (but read it too): http://www.tek.com/cgi-bin/rfbypass.cgi?link=http://www2.tek.com/cmswpt/ti
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-07/msg00118.html (8,387 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu