Mail Archive Search: <+from:rhulett1@consolidated.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:rhulett1@consolidated.net: 103 ]

Total 103 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] Older rigs (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:51:04 -0500; Not sure why, but remain impressed by capabilities of my older Ten-Tec rigs ( 540, 544, 546 ). With little effort this afternoon, Bulgaria, Gibraltar, Slovenia, Slovak Republic in about 30 minutes us; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00070.html (8,000 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Older rigs (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:56:04 -0500; Bob, My antenna is one of L.B. Cebik's favorite, an 88' doublet, center fed with 300 ohm twinlead. Deed restrictions prevent a tower with gain antenna on it. Certainly the Ten-Tec receiver is a plus; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00107.html (11,188 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:58:49 -0400 (EDT); I'm somewhat puzzled by why TT discontinued the Argonaut V not too long ago, and the 405 QRP amplifier looong ago, now introduces an amp (I know the new one is 100W vs 50W )and soon an Argonaut VI. S; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00144.html (9,557 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] new to CW dxing (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:03:00 -0500; I can't claim any talent, but less than 50 watts ( often less than 5 watts ) to an 88' EDZ produced DXCC over the course of 2 years. The DX ops ( especially those on expeditions ) are the ones with t; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00071.html (9,735 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] My First Ten-Tec (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:18:37 -0500; My first Ten-Tec was a used Argonaut 509, followed by a new Argonaut V. Today, use a 544, 540 and Omni C. Main reason for buying the 509 was company reputation and wanting multiband QRP rig at reason; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00107.html (8,213 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec firsts??? (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 09:38:32 -0500; Owning a Triton IV, wasn't the receiver essentially same from Argonaut 509 through all the Tritons? Curt KB5JO That was the Triton I. The Triton IV came out in 1976.; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00201.html (8,894 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Just a 'foot-in-mouth' observation (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:02:47 -0500; I'm not a DXer, but enjoy working DX. I'm not a contester, but enjoy working contests anyway. After all, many weekends the non-WARC bands are full of one contest or another. This is my hobby, not my; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00101.html (10,131 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:01:05 -0500; After selling an Omni VII, "settled" for a 544, a 540, and an Omni C in my home shack. Only digital mode I operate is CW. Yes, long live the 544/540. Curt, KB5JO Would any of us in our home shacks se; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00111.html (10,033 bytes)
29. [TenTec] Displayed frequency question (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:43:26 -0500 (EST); I own an Omni D, Omni C, and 544. For all three WWV is zero beat at 21.000. For all three, frequency displayed for sideband signals matches net frequency. In every case, CW frequency displayed is low; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00046.html (7,163 bytes)
30. [TenTec] Eagle owner experience (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 13:01:05 -0600; Am considering purchase of a new radio, haven't noticed much mention of the 599 here. Am curious about owner experience, reliability in particular. And, for those who have owned one, then moved on to; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00102.html (7,360 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] Eagle owner experience (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 13:37:53 -0600; Hi Rick, Thanks for the info, I'll visit there. I don't expect rigs to "fail" all the time, but sometimes folks have issues with firmware/software with the software-enabled radios. So outright failur; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00104.html (8,485 bytes)
32. [TenTec] A risky question (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:48:00 -0600; I'm considering buying a new radio, either an Eagle or a K3. Hoping to avoid a flame storm, would appreciate observations from folks who have had opportunity to operate both. Realizing the lab test s; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00212.html (8,174 bytes)
33. [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:14:16 -0500 (EST); I've avoided owning a scope, but the recent discussion about troubleshooting low power from an Omni D has me rethinking. Most of the gear I own now old, have managed to diagnose problems without owni; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00360.html (8,912 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] OMNI C Mixer or PTO problem (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 08:09:26 -0600; I was foolish enough to buy a "mint" Omni C that the PO claimed was working FB before sending it to me. Among other problems, it also displayed the IF frequency (9 MHz) for several bands. It's proble; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00411.html (11,947 bytes)
35. [TenTec] FS:Omni D/B (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:57:17 -0500 (EST); Omni D ver B ( no WARC ), $200 shipped CONUS. Contact offline if interested. 73, Curt KB5JO; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-01/msg00262.html (6,569 bytes)
36. [TenTec] 544 Drive Problem (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 22:39:38 -0500 (EST); I own a 544 that functions fine, except it seems deficient on drive. That is, on CW, with ALC full cw, even with drive full cw, alc light stays off. Power out is about 80-100W on all bands into a dum; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00024.html (7,160 bytes)
37. [TenTec] FS: Omni C parts unit (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 05:45:31 -0600; If anyone is looking for an Omni C parts rig, contact me off list. 73, Curt KB5JO; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00039.html (6,894 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] sold: Omni C parts unit (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 12:30:36 -0600; Thanks for those who expressed interest, the unit is spoken for. 73, Curt KB5JO If anyone is looking for an Omni C parts rig, contact me off list. 73, Curt KB5JO _____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00057.html (7,761 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] Tuner stiff on Century 21 (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:13:03 -0600; If it's anything like the other PTOs, I'd say buy the kit for $35 and perform the rebuild yourself. I had never performed this task before until a week ago, when redid the one on an Omni C. I am very; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00061.html (9,426 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] Tuner stiff on Century 21 (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 05:43:22 -0500 (EST); Yes, forgot to mention performing the work in a pan. I use one of those shallow foil backing pans stolen from the xyl for maintenance and construction. A life saver for assembling smt hardware.; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00065.html (7,892 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]