Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rhulett1@consolidated.net: 103 ]

Total 103 documents matching your query.

61. [TenTec] Omni C not for 17M? (score: 1)
Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:35:11 -0600
Recently acquired fairly nice Omni C, a model which I have never owned. It lacks crystals for 12 and 17M, recall reading posts stating that 17M wasn't useable on this rig because the mixing scheme al
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00327.html (6,892 bytes)

62. [TenTec] 544 Drive Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 22:39:38 -0500 (EST)
I own a 544 that functions fine, except it seems deficient on drive. That is, on CW, with ALC full cw, even with drive full cw, alc light stays off. Power out is about 80-100W on all bands into a dum
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00024.html (6,811 bytes)

63. [TenTec] FS: Omni C parts unit (score: 1)
Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 05:45:31 -0600
If anyone is looking for an Omni C parts rig, contact me off list. 73, Curt KB5JO _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00040.html (6,594 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] sold: Omni C parts unit (score: 1)
Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 12:30:36 -0600
Thanks for those who expressed interest, the unit is spoken for. 73, Curt KB5JO _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00058.html (7,944 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] Tuner stiff on Century 21 (score: 1)
Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:13:03 -0600
If it's anything like the other PTOs, I'd say buy the kit for $35 and perform the rebuild yourself. I had never performed this task before until a week ago, when redid the one on an Omni C. I am very
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00062.html (8,403 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] Tuner stiff on Century 21 (score: 1)
Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 05:43:22 -0500 (EST)
Yes, forgot to mention performing the work in a pan. I use one of those shallow foil backing pans stolen from the xyl for maintenance and construction. A life saver for assembling smt hardware. _____
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00066.html (8,202 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] Tuner stiff on Century 21 (score: 1)
Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 05:49:33 -0500 (EST)
Yes, cleaning and lubricating is probably all that is needed in most cases. The end cap on my Omni C was broken, having a replacement on hand was essential to finishing the job. And, after all the po
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00067.html (8,046 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] model 255 power supply manual? (score: 1)
Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:59:37 -0600
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00265.html (7,945 bytes)

69. [TenTec] FS:Omni D/B (score: 1)
Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:57:17 -0500 (EST)
Omni D ver B ( no WARC ), $200 shipped CONUS. Contact offline if interested. 73, Curt KB5JO _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-01/msg00262.html (6,683 bytes)

70. [TenTec] Displayed frequency question (score: 1)
Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:43:26 -0500 (EST)
I own an Omni D, Omni C, and 544. For all three WWV is zero beat at 21.000. For all three, frequency displayed for sideband signals matches net frequency. In every case, CW frequency displayed is low
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00045.html (7,254 bytes)

71. [TenTec] Eagle owner experience (score: 1)
Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 13:01:05 -0600
Am considering purchase of a new radio, haven't noticed much mention of the 599 here. Am curious about owner experience, reliability in particular. And, for those who have owned one, then moved on to
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00101.html (7,450 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] Eagle owner experience (score: 1)
Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 13:37:53 -0600
Hi Rick, Thanks for the info, I'll visit there. I don't expect rigs to "fail" all the time, but sometimes folks have issues with firmware/software with the software-enabled radios. So outright failur
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00103.html (7,949 bytes)

73. [TenTec] A risky question (score: 1)
Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:48:00 -0600
I'm considering buying a new radio, either an Eagle or a K3. Hoping to avoid a flame storm, would appreciate observations from folks who have had opportunity to operate both. Realizing the lab test s
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00211.html (7,179 bytes)

74. [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1)
Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:14:16 -0500 (EST)
I've avoided owning a scope, but the recent discussion about troubleshooting low power from an Omni D has me rethinking. Most of the gear I own now old, have managed to diagnose problems without owni
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00359.html (8,331 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] OMNI C Mixer or PTO problem (score: 1)
Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 08:09:26 -0600
I was foolish enough to buy a "mint" Omni C that the PO claimed was working FB before sending it to me. Among other problems, it also displayed the IF frequency (9 MHz) for several bands. It's proble
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00410.html (10,609 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] Just a 'foot-in-mouth' observation (score: 1)
Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:02:47 -0500
I'm not a DXer, but enjoy working DX. I'm not a contester, but enjoy working contests anyway. After all, many weekends the non-WARC bands are full of one contest or another. This is my hobby, not my
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00102.html (9,858 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1)
Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:01:05 -0500
After selling an Omni VII, "settled" for a 544, a 540, and an Omni C in my home shack. Only digital mode I operate is CW. Yes, long live the 544/540. Curt, KB5JO _____________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00112.html (9,460 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] new to CW dxing (score: 1)
Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:03:00 -0500
I can't claim any talent, but less than 50 watts ( often less than 5 watts ) to an 88' EDZ produced DXCC over the course of 2 years. The DX ops ( especially those on expeditions ) are the ones with t
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00070.html (9,893 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] My First Ten-Tec (score: 1)
Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:18:37 -0500
My first Ten-Tec was a used Argonaut 509, followed by a new Argonaut V. Today, use a 544, 540 and Omni C. Main reason for buying the 509 was company reputation and wanting multiband QRP rig at reason
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00106.html (7,081 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec firsts??? (score: 1)
Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 09:38:32 -0500
Owning a Triton IV, wasn't the receiver essentially same from Argonaut 509 through all the Tritons? Curt KB5JO _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.co
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00200.html (7,965 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
This search system is powered by Namazu