Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:romers@shaw.ca: 82 ]

Total 82 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] running cw with generator question (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:19:22 -0800
I want to thank all that responded (on and off list) to my question about the Honda eu series generators and running CW. The consensus is: they are fine reliable generators; they do have solvable RFI
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00066.html (9,787 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] External DSP with Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:38:48 -0800
I had the same setup with my Jupiter and it was an excellent addition even with the jupe's 150 hz filter. The skirts on the 784 are far sharper than the jupe's filters. If you really want to get rid
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00686.html (9,479 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Orion 11 (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:51:14 -0800
Hmmm. But what if the DX station in the pile-up doesn't have an Orion? Then I presume he'll come back to the strongest signal calling? What has been gained? Better to invest in more field strength? I
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00316.html (8,732 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Code Speed (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:19:02 -0800
Walt, very interesting... I went through SESS in 1956, MOS was (as near as I can remember) 053 -- High Speed Radio Opr. It was called Camp Gordon then. I can't make out if you were before me or behin
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00428.html (13,096 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Code Speed (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:40:24 -0800
But if there's more than one in the passband, not so easy? 73 jerome - va7vv
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00504.html (11,149 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] If you ground it - it will come! (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 22:34:58 -0700
"Induction on one piece of data", as the philosopher said to the art mistress... I'll bet you haven't won the lottery either, but some folks have. With respect, VA7VV
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00283.html (9,145 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec used/demo list 3 April 2006 (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 12:59:10 -0700
Stan... I would like to purchase the 302j remote encoder/keypad for the Jupiter. I presume the cable is included? I can get a money order in USD in the mail as soon as you tell me it's still availabl
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00088.html (10,511 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec used/demo list 3 April 2006 (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 13:24:27 -0700
Eeeeeek! How embarrassing... sorry guys! jerome
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00094.html (7,933 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio Deluxe and Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:35:11 -0800
Dave Tipton wrote: Does anyone have any experience using HRD with their Jupiters, and what were your thoughts? Free vs $55 then $45 per year, makes me want to investigate. Newcomer to the list, so so
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00037.html (8,948 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Latest 1.28 for Jupiter A.O.K. (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:42:16 -0800
And... the new filters now work with the latest N4PY software. Slick! jerome - VA7VV
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00040.html (7,210 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] How do the new filters work in the recent Jupiter Firmware upgrade? (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:47:16 -0800
Hi Tim, et al difference between being able to copy weaker sigs in a noisy city environment and not. If the S meter can be believed, going from 300 hz to 100 hz reduces the noise reading by almost an
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01154.html (9,696 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] Johnson matchbox tuner (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:56:02 -0800
I have two antennas fed with ladder line: an 80m cf zepp and a vert. dipole (30 ft each side). Both tune fine on 30m with the matchbox set on the 40m position. If that doesn't work, try the 20m posit
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01203.html (8,586 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] Johnson matchbox tuner (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:08:32 -0800
Another trick with the matchbox is to get a piece of Air Dux, make taps every other turn and put it across the balanced line input along with the feedline. Now adjust the number of turns and retune t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01211.html (8,289 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:02:33 -0800
Why would you not connect also the shields together on the outside? jerome - va7vv Get 2 pieces of coax, equal in length. Route them through the wall, connect center conductor only, one to each leg o
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00011.html (9,905 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] What makes the 238 good or any other tuner good? (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:25:46 -0800
Set it on 40m and tune 'er up. If it doesn't tune properly, put a tapped inductor across the balanced input and find the right tap. I've had no trouble with my matchbox on 30m using a number of diffe
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00615.html (10,512 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] 1254 Q-Multiplier... Yes. Add a signal strenght metertoo and replace those 1N4148s in the 2nd Mixer! (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:13:56 -0800
Lew wrote: Great q multiplier circuit on the HBR site. In fact, the HBR site is absolutely facinating. http://www.qsl.net/k5bcq/HBR/hbr.htm --Original Message-- From: Bwana Bob Date: 12/28/05 20:01:3
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00909.html (10,183 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] S meter readings (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:36:04 -0800
I fail to understand what all this rafter shacking about S meter readings is all about. It's all about accuracy and precision -- both at the same time. Now, if you *really* care, you'll calibrate you
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00916.html (8,346 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] S meter readings (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:57:54 -0800
I fail to understand what all this rafter shacking about S meter readings is all about. It's all about accuracy and precision -- both at the same time. Now, if you *really* care, you'll calibrate yo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00918.html (8,960 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] How to Hear the Weak Ones, (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:13:22 -0800
Hi Ron, I've looked at the Timewave (used to be the JPS ANC-4), and a better option, the MFJ unit (has a better combination of phase options.) It's nice in that if the bulk of your noise is coming f
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00295.html (10,035 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] How to Hear the Weak Ones, (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:43:02 -0800
For me, the most useful part of the mfj noise canceling device was being able to use separate receiving and transmitting antennas and being able to continuously vary the gain on the rx side. Of cours
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00297.html (9,628 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu