Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:romers@shaw.ca: 82 ]

Total 82 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] Astron RS-35M and Omni VI (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:52:22 -0700
Byron J. Watts wrote: i have ~heard~ a complaint that the Astron's only weakness is in it's AC line switch, it dies after several hundred operations, the rest of the supply will be fine but the switc
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00002.html (7,923 bytes)

42. Re: [TenTec] ladder line (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 09:59:08 -0700
For short haul (NVIS), both horizontal antennas are going to work better anyway. For long haul (transatlantic) you might just find that the GAP works better. I've never had a GAP but I can assure yo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00312.html (10,011 bytes)

43. Re: [TenTec] Tuner for Centurion to balanced antenna (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:54:09 -0700
CATFISHTWO@aol.com wrote: I have the best of all worlds, retired, divorced ( over 10 years,),and enough income to play. I want a radio, I buy what I want, when I want, and don't ask any one for permi
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00763.html (9,034 bytes)

44. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Volume (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 20:25:08 -0700
Dave, W5WRG _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec Dave, I remember having the same problem. My
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00312.html (8,468 bytes)

45. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec and Butternut HF6V Problem And Question (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:20:33 -0700
OTAKEBI@aol.com wrote: Thanks Stu, I will try what you say. I have heard a lot of good stuff on the Force 12 but wow, are they expensive. I have also heard about the bad caps and this weekend will ch
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00749.html (12,627 bytes)

46. Re: [TenTec] orion problems (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 10:13:13 -0700
Ken/w8keb Hmmmm.... why would you buy three of something you didn't like? Jerome/VA7VV
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00631.html (8,643 bytes)

47. Re: [TenTec] real CW ops (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:15:28 -0700
Comes from the old commercial CW ops that worked on the great lakes steamers in the first quarter of the 20th century. If you want to hear the actual swing, make a sked with me. The guy that taught m
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00149.html (10,099 bytes)

48. Re: [TenTec] real CW ops (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 23:19:51 -0700
Methinks thou doth protest too much my man -- the sweetest music is played on an old violin. Best, jerome -- va7vv TO get an idea of this, try sending: "Bens best bent wire" or "USS Tennessee" withou
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00166.html (9,408 bytes)

49. Re: [TenTec] Popping Noise from Orion and Centurion (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 21:01:06 -0700
Seems to me the human ear can barely detect a 1db change; this 0.19db loss is about 80% less than what the ear of a young person might be able to hear on a good day. Why worry? Best, jerome - va7vv -
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00223.html (9,666 bytes)

50. Re: [TenTec] Real CW (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 00:18:48 -0700
Well, here's a theory: Copying? I think it's all about being able to recognize and deal with sound patterns. Most folks have this capacity to some extent, but some don't. If you really don't, then I
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00352.html (10,351 bytes)

51. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus 550 question (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 09:06:56 -0700
Jim, I had the same question using the same GUI on the Jupiter. Using Carl's software, the noise blanker worked; using the Pegasus GUI, it did not. In correspondence with Carl, he confirmed that ther
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00578.html (10,556 bytes)

52. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus 550 question (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:08:45 -0700
Jim: I for one would be very interested in what you find out, re: the noise blanker on the two softwares. I wrote to TT telling them of the problem; they wrote back saying everything worked fine. I w
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00586.html (14,101 bytes)

53. Re: [TenTec] Orion noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:38:57 -0800
Carl: Does the Orion's NB unblank the noise in the presence of a signal outside but near the passband of the rx (every NB I've had does this)? i.e. When listening to a CW signal, say, under pulse noi
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00409.html (13,701 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] In Canada? Please call Ten-Tec at (800) 833-7373 (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:33:18 -0800
"... the number you have called cannot be completed as dialed, etc., etc." Guess it's still broken, at least from Vancouver in the People's Republic of Canada 1332 Pacific time. Best, va7vv -- Origin
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00548.html (9,847 bytes)

55. Re: [TenTec] We need a ten-tec to compete with Icom 706 MKIIG (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:01:25 -0800
Well, I've driven over 100,000 miles with my 706MkII in the truck (no G) and it's a good little CW rig. Sure, they could have done better than 2A on rx and made it so the note didn't go to rat excrem
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00711.html (9,072 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] signal on 28.634 (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 15:03:58 -0800
S-1 with lots of QSB; two tones with zero beats at 28.636.4 and 28636.6 in Vancouver BC, 2300Z on Jan. 4th. Roof mounted Butternut & Jupe Jerome - VA7VV -- Original Message -- From: "Thomas Jednacz"
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00098.html (10,013 bytes)

57. Re: [TenTec] RE: slide rule dial- how to use? (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:08:56 -0800
Yea but that was back in 1964 before the VE's took over the CW bands. N4LQ I remember the complex procedure when I was a novice and used an old NC-100 receiver. 1. Turn tuning until you hear hams. 2
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00212.html (9,542 bytes)

58. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 20:31:02 -0800
Dear Mr.Fish... I too am a CW only guy. The Jupe has been the best CW rig on TX I've ever owned in 53 years of hamming. The receive side IMHO, could have been done better. I strongly suggest you try
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00607.html (11,661 bytes)

59. Re: [TenTec] Delta II in a moble.... not recommended. (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:46:20 -0800
Check out the handy-dandy Battery Booster... a little switching supply that floats in series the car battery keeping the total voltage to the rig at 13.8v. See: http://members.cox.net/w4rry/ I had th
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00954.html (11,581 bytes)

60. Re: [TenTec] Advantages of computer control for s DX'er - N9DG's VHF+lineup (score: 1)
Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:04:09 -0800
-- Original Message -- From: "Jim Davis" <nn6ee@yahoo.com> To: "Ten-Tec List" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:46 AM Subject: Re: [TenTec] Advantages of computer control for
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00985.html (8,866 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu