Mail Archive Search: <+from:ron@morell.us>

Results:

References: [ +from:ron@morell.us: 101 ]

Total 101 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Service (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:53:02 -0800; Sad that Paul didn't answer as needed on those questions. He has helped me a time or two and his suggestions and parts supplied by mail did do the work I needed done. So I'm pretty happy with Paul. N; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00550.html (10,587 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] OT: Crisis in the Shack (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:52:19 -0800; Wait a minute.... I don't have Ten Tec cup... I'll give you C$5.00 and pay the shipping for yours. Ron KA7U Well, dang if I didn't leave my shiny new TenTec mug (with Red dot) in the kitchen. Then th; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00577.html (8,593 bytes)
23. [TenTec] Initial comments about ORION II (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:06:39 -0800; My ORION II arrived yesterday and 15 seconds later it was out of the box and on the air. I tried it out for several hours yesterday and set it up in all the configurations that caused problems with t; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00708.html (7,868 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Orion with V2 rf gain (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:55:59 -0800; I'm curious, why not run the RF gain full open and use the ATTN to pad the signal down to a reasonable level? Doesn't adjusting the RF gain down degrade the signal to noise ratio, or does it have not; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00709.html (12,285 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Initial comments about ORION II (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:54:34 -0800; Toby, No, I do not notice a reduced audio when using the BW encoder from 200Hz to 100Hz and I've tried it several times in UCW mode (I made certain I was centered on the signal tone). I do have the 6; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00734.html (10,856 bytes)
26. [TenTec] LW receiver (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:07:18 -0800; Listening on 260 KHz with my ORION II tonight and heard KSL5 radio in Utah which broadcasts on 1160 KHz. That would be 900 KHz below their broadcast frequency. I'm curious about this and wonder what; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg01047.html (6,726 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] LW receiver (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:40:49 -0800; John, I was listening with the sub receiver. Thanks for the input. 73 Ron KA7U That is almost assuredly an image based around the 450 khz IF or multiples thereof. I am awaiting my Orion II and cannot; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00020.html (8,693 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] LW receiver (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:41:45 -0800; Martin, I suspected this was the case. Thanks for your response. 73 and Happy New Year. Ron KA7U That would be the image of the 2nd IF = 450 kHz. TT's clever phrase is "specifications apply > 1.8 MHz; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00021.html (8,913 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] LW receiver (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 17:44:09 -0800; Tom, Ineresting idea of two AM broadcast stations producing the signal at 260 KHz, but as I did not hear any signal but the 1160 KHz station there, I think it is probably a product of the IF mixer. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00080.html (9,436 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] LW receiver (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 18:05:41 -0800; John, What an interesting idea! My antenna is a 204' G5RV type dipole and the connections at the top are stainless steel eyelets for strain relief and then soldered to the 470 ohm plastic insulated c; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00081.html (11,875 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] LW receiver (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:48:04 -0800; I heard another today at 3580 KHz on the Main receiver. Found one of the stations at 1460. This time I could detect another station faintly overlaid with the main station from 1460 KHz. This signal w; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00120.html (12,767 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] LW receiver - did it sound normal? (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:51:09 -0800; Hello Mike, For the report of signal at 260 KHz, it was completely normal AM sound music and all. Did not hear any other station overlaid with it. Loud and clear with ten over S9 signal. I heard anot; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00121.html (11,750 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] LW receiver (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:21:43 -0800; Thanks For this information Bob. I don't have a metal tower or guy lines, as I'm using wooden masts to support the antenna, but certainly several places along the way that might detect and mix strong; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00124.html (15,851 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] LW receiver - did it sound normal? (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:25:56 -0800; Thank you for this reply Mike, I appreciate the benefit of this experience. I have wooden masts so not likely a problem on those... But the SG-230 antenna tuner at the antenna is a likely suspect as; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00125.html (12,317 bytes)
35. [TenTec] OT-Grid block keying filter (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:04:27 -0800; Been working on a Heathkit HW-16 since a discussion here a while back about chirp and drift and stuff and how new things are improved over old. Anyhow, after replacing some filter caps and things, th; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00127.html (7,366 bytes)
36. [TenTec] Heterodyne frequencies within the O2 (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 09:48:02 -0800; Reporting back with more information on the apparent mixing of broadcast stations in the ORION II and the detection of those mixed signals. Following some of the suggestions here as to further testin; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00185.html (7,565 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] 2.028 is out - error message (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:55:13 -0700; So maybe I should upgrade to XP... Oh well, all is well that ends well. Ron KA7U When your flash utility first starts, select "Settings". In here you will be able to define which comport the Orion II; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00392.html (11,312 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] O2 keyer (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:47:38 -0700; George, I have not had a problem using the internal keyer with my ORION II. The radio has been nearly bullet proof, in my use of it, with few and minor exceptions. Ron KA7U George, Please tell me mor; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00442.html (9,706 bytes)
39. [TenTec] Version 2.028 report.. (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:33:02 -0700; Operating the ORION II with the version 2.028 software is very pleasant. I've left the sweep on all the time, had the NB going on both receivers and the NR engaged occasionally, had the Sub receiver; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00524.html (7,493 bytes)
40. [TenTec] Ver 2.028, maybe a problem? (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:26:37 -0700; OK, is it just me or is the AM mode transmit not working in version 2.028? On my radio, the carrier spikes up to 100 watts out on the dummy load and then drops off to nothing. The monitor is quiet an; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00525.html (7,252 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]