Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ron@morell.us: 101 ]

Total 101 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Orion II settings for 706 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:35:27 -0600
Ray, Generally I've found a setting of 53, SP 3, TX EQ 5dB, TX Filter BW 3000, gets a good report from the more critical folks. My voice is in the low tenor range. Ron KA7U I'm curious as to what O2
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00600.html (8,438 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] Orion II settings for 706 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:43:06 -0600
Charlie, I'm using a Ten Tec 706 microphone. Ron KA7U Which microphone are you using with these settings? Charlie Tnx, Ron. I too have found SP 3 to be the optimal setting for most SSB operation, but
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00657.html (9,269 bytes)

23. [TenTec] Computer control of the ORION (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:01:16 -0600
After using my ORION II for the time I've had it, I find that the N4PY software makes the radio much nicer and more functional to use. And, I do mean MUCH NICER. As I look at this radio and the gener
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00729.html (8,569 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Computer Control of the Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Morell" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:32:49 -0600
You have my sympathy Merle. Past experience indicates that existing products only improve slightly with patches and fixes. New products are the "New and Improved" versions. :) Seems to me that system
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00758.html (10,274 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Computer Control of the Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Morell" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:01:41 -0600
Lee, I will be interested to see this next generation of Flex SDR radio. Full QSK is required as well as a great receiver. It definitely sounds like it is headed in the right direction. If a knob is
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00760.html (10,586 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Is Orion really worth it? Given the published problems? (score: 1)
Author: ron@morell.us
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:34:53 -0700
Wil, I use the ORION II with 2.034 software and find it to be the best radio I've ever used. Surely it can be improved and some of the complaints have merit, but they are below the threshold of noise
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00554.html (12,555 bytes)

27. [TenTec] Sennheiser HD 202 w/ handi cable clip (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:43:22 -0600
Having faithfully read the numerous posts on head phones a while back on this reflector, I decided to take a chance on the Sennheiser HD-202 head phones. Prior to these phones I have been using the R
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00209.html (8,486 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Sennheiser HD 202 w/ handi cable clip (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 22:16:20 -0600
Oh, and the radio I'm listening to is the ORION II. Ron KA7U I just discovered something that might be of general interest. Using the Sennheiser HD-202 phones the "click clack" of CW keying when send
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00271.html (9,165 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Happy Orion owners (was question about updates) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 10:09:02 -0600
Steve, I started the thread "The Orion sure makes me happy" a while back. You should have read some of the email I received from others who did not appreciate that I could say anything good about the
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00100.html (15,946 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Another 2.033 problem (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 22:40:16 -0600
Ron, I did not stay with 2.033 went back to 2.032. Your posts are genuine and helpful, I don't think you need to fear. <grin> Seeing that you might be paraphrasing one of my posts, I should think tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00198.html (9,238 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Problem: Please confirm Orion II Radios (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 17:53:04 -0600
Phil, It does this here too. Both receiver A or B. The hardware noise blanker seems to work correctly with these settings so that might be a work around for your situation. Ron KA7U Version 2.032 sof
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00105.html (10,641 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] Problem: Please confirm Orion II Radios (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 22:24:47 -0600
Carl, My O2 fails after the battery and master reset as well, but I do have to turn the multi knob to increase or decrease the center frequency of the notch to get it to fail. So this bug is dependen
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00107.html (12,797 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] Problem: Please confirm Orion II RadiosFIX!!!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:13:19 -0600
Grant, The suggested "cures" don't work on my O2 either. As the adage goes, if "it hurts when you do that, don't do it", HI. It is interesting that I never would have gotten around to turning all of
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00110.html (8,894 bytes)

34. [TenTec] N4PY Software and frequency memory restore (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 22:18:01 -0600
One thing that is frustrating with the ORION is that when you do a memory clear, the contents of the stored frequencies are over written with 15.0Mhz and all the old channels are lost. I hate that. S
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00139.html (8,371 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] General coverage RX/XCVR suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:38:48 -0600
http://www.dxradio.co.uk/sangean/ats909.html Al, Some people say little Sangean ATS 909 radio is a keeper. Ron KA7U OK folks, I need some input here. I'm looking for a reasonably priced general cover
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00141.html (11,565 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] The Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 09:49:40 -0600
Toby, I did not take time to record any of the ORION audio while I had it, but I've checked the O2 audio as a result of the negative comments about it and have not found it to be lacking... Recording
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00199.html (9,940 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] "The Bug" a/k/a Orion II Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 20:02:21 -0600
Barry, I'm gradually developing an interest in what creates and sustains a group email thread! Absolutely fascinating. I do also collect keys, heathkit radios and test equipment, and enjoy CW rag che
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00279.html (10,164 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] Orion Main and Sub frequency difference (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:47:26 -0600
Carl, I've checked very carefully on my ORION II and there is 4 hertz of difference between the Sub Receiver and Main Receiver at 15.0 MHz. This might give a very mild reverb effect on a music note..
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00407.html (9,092 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Orion Main and Sub frequency difference (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:19:58 -0600
Ken, This is an interesting idea and would probably be interesting to listen too. So far in my use of diversity reception, I've only worked CW, and the speed of the signal tends to obscure phase roll
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00420.html (11,954 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] Reflector is getting effective at killing sales (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 09:28:54 -0600
Ci, The reflector is mostly about "finding fault", and currently, it is about finding fault with the ORION radios. As a practical matter of using the ORION II and the ORION that I had before it, they
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00473.html (14,830 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu