Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ron@morell.us: 101 ]

Total 101 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] Rog K9RB Antenna Tuners (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:31:53 -0700
Interesting that a resonant antenna is claimed to radiate better than a multiband antenna with an antenna tuner at the feed point of the antenna. Clearly, if coax carries current at a high SWR, the l
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00684.html (10,334 bytes)

42. [TenTec] OT: Key Clicks HW-16 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 16:14:44 -0700
I wrote earlier looking for technical info and did not get a reply, so I'll send this and see what happens. It is "off topic" but then so is much of what I read here... :) A while back, there was a d
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00836.html (8,614 bytes)

43. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews? (score: 1)
Author: ron@morell.us
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:46:27 -0800
Hello Dave, I like the IC PRO III for many reasons. One reason is it is less expensive than the O2. One reason is it works very well and is fairly intuitive to use. One reason is it has a nice sweep
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00108.html (11,238 bytes)

44. Re: [TenTec] Orion II questions (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:45:58 -0700
Joe, On my O2 using VER. 2.028, the RF gain is reduced from 100 to 60 or thereabouts when turning the multi knob slowly. The S-meter reading moves from 0 to S9 with this adjustment. When adjusting th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00209.html (9,272 bytes)

45. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:59:36 -0700
Dave, Near as I can tell the only thing broke is the AM transmitter and the AM monitor. All other functins seem to work FB here in the applications I use. CW, Digi modes, SSB, Shortwave listening, al
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00212.html (9,439 bytes)

46. Re: [TenTec] Ocean noise (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:14:25 -0700
This is a very strange thread. I've never heard Ocean noise on my ORION... What am I doing wrong, that I don't get to hear this particular noise? I have heard static and natural interference type noi
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00396.html (24,697 bytes)

47. [TenTec] Fantastic Service (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:25:08 -0700
I sent the O2 in for service on Friday last week. Sent it UPS 3 day select. I received it back from Ten Tec today! Thursday, a six day turn around from my door to my door. Wow! The work was done and
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00797.html (7,094 bytes)

48. [Orion] Filter Tap settings / NR etc. (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:26:11 -0700
I have read a few statements here concerning NR and filter tap settings and audio distortion and other perceived effects of the DSP filter system on the ORION II. I've read the manual too... The filt
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00358.html (9,057 bytes)

49. Re: [TenTec] Sweep on OII (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:03:04 -0700
Carl, It is nice to see reason on this reflector. I just want to say that your software is great. I use it a lot, especially for digital modes with MixW and for shortwave listening. You have a good p
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00606.html (11,227 bytes)

50. Re: [TenTec] V2, TT where are we going? (score: 1)
Author: ron@morell.us
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:22:13 -0800
Reading the mail on this reflector is interesting and sometimes informative... My experience in communicating with Ten Tec on the ORION II issues I've had that concerned me, were completely resolved
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01233.html (15,887 bytes)

51. [TenTec] The ORION II sure makes me happy (score: 1)
Author: ron@morell.us
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:33:19 -0800
After considering all the discussion on the short comings and the anomalies of the ORION here on the reflector, I just have to say, in my practical use of the ORION II, it meets my expectations. It i
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01276.html (8,320 bytes)

52. Re: [TenTec] Problem: Please confirm Orion II Radios (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 17:53:04 -0600
Phil, It does this here too. Both receiver A or B. The hardware noise blanker seems to work correctly with these settings so that might be a work around for your situation. Ron KA7U Version 2.032 sof
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00106.html (10,906 bytes)

53. Re: [TenTec] Problem: Please confirm Orion II Radios (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 22:24:47 -0600
Carl, My O2 fails after the battery and master reset as well, but I do have to turn the multi knob to increase or decrease the center frequency of the notch to get it to fail. So this bug is dependen
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00108.html (12,919 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] Problem: Please confirm Orion II RadiosFIX!!!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:13:19 -0600
Grant, The suggested "cures" don't work on my O2 either. As the adage goes, if "it hurts when you do that, don't do it", HI. It is interesting that I never would have gotten around to turning all of
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00111.html (9,119 bytes)

55. [TenTec] N4PY Software and frequency memory restore (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 22:18:01 -0600
One thing that is frustrating with the ORION is that when you do a memory clear, the contents of the stored frequencies are over written with 15.0Mhz and all the old channels are lost. I hate that. S
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00140.html (8,412 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] General coverage RX/XCVR suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:38:48 -0600
http://www.dxradio.co.uk/sangean/ats909.html Al, Some people say little Sangean ATS 909 radio is a keeper. Ron KA7U OK folks, I need some input here. I'm looking for a reasonably priced general cover
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00142.html (11,498 bytes)

57. Re: [TenTec] The Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 09:49:40 -0600
Toby, I did not take time to record any of the ORION audio while I had it, but I've checked the O2 audio as a result of the negative comments about it and have not found it to be lacking... Recording
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00200.html (10,584 bytes)

58. Re: [TenTec] "The Bug" a/k/a Orion II Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 20:02:21 -0600
Barry, I'm gradually developing an interest in what creates and sustains a group email thread! Absolutely fascinating. I do also collect keys, heathkit radios and test equipment, and enjoy CW rag che
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00280.html (10,327 bytes)

59. Re: [TenTec] Orion Main and Sub frequency difference (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:47:26 -0600
Carl, I've checked very carefully on my ORION II and there is 4 hertz of difference between the Sub Receiver and Main Receiver at 15.0 MHz. This might give a very mild reverb effect on a music note..
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00409.html (9,116 bytes)

60. Re: [TenTec] Orion Main and Sub frequency difference (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:19:58 -0600
Ken, This is an interesting idea and would probably be interesting to listen too. So far in my use of diversity reception, I've only worked CW, and the speed of the signal tends to obscure phase roll
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00422.html (11,991 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu