Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ron@morell.us: 101 ]

Total 101 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] Omni C self-test (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 08:55:09 -0600
Jerry, Every time you post, I learn something. Thank you! Ron KA7U The 17 meter problem in the Omni C was described here yesterday as being second harmonic of the IF. That's not quite true. Its actua
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00506.html (10,089 bytes)

42. Re: [TenTec] RTTY with my Pegasus WHAT FUN! (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:56:00 -0600
Hello Craig, I use the ORION II in the digital modes, mostly PSK31 and RTTY, with an occassional SSTV when 20 meters is good. I use N4PY control software and MixW configured to use Pegausus/Jupiter (
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00569.html (10,063 bytes)

43. Re: [TenTec] V2.055 bug /watch out on 60 meters! (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:49:45 -0600
Sinisa, =:-) What a sense of humor. But at least you agree, it meets the specification! Ron KA7U Believe it or not, the "565 Manual" does not even attempt to define how is the the TX mode established
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00633.html (10,174 bytes)

44. Re: [TenTec] V2.055 bug /watch out on 60 meters! (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:34:25 -0600
I've been thinking about this discussion. At first I thought it was funny, but after consideration I think a review of the ORION Sub receiver function might be the right direction for this conversati
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00652.html (12,146 bytes)

45. Re: [TenTec] V2.055 bug /watch out on 60 meters! (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:49:18 -0600
Buck, I have used the same method you state here, but I always have the Main RX mode set the same as the Sub RX mode when doing this. On My ORION II, I've not been able to replicate the problem of tr
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00673.html (10,676 bytes)

46. [TenTec] working with V. 2.033 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:40:07 -0600
Installed the version 2.033 in the ORION 2 a while ago and the initial things noticed are: 1. The NB/NR/NOTCH lose the audio problem is now fixed 2. The speech processor seems to work better (on my m
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00756.html (7,486 bytes)

47. [TenTec] NR function sounds OK (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:59:24 -0600
Oh and I also notice the NR function on SSB seems to be working pretty good with v 2.033 too. But then, I thought it worked reasonable in the previous versions... Ron KA7U
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00757.html (6,716 bytes)

48. [TenTec] line out levels are higher in V. 2.033 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 21:05:31 -0600
The Line Out amplitude is much higher in Ver. 2.033. Had to set it to the Low output and adjust my line in on the sound card for a higher input. Almost out of range without additional attenuation. (u
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00781.html (6,829 bytes)

49. Re: [TenTec] Ver 2.033 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:19:41 -0600
Doug, Most of the time I use headphones but using the speaker, I'm not noticing popping or snapping that changes with EQ settings. Here is how I've set the version 2.033 and it seems to function OK s
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00782.html (9,599 bytes)

50. Re: [TenTec] PRIVATE& CONFIDENTIAL Re: Orion vs SDR 1K (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:25:26 -0600
The failure to privately post the original rant that started this thread should say something about the competence of the original poster. Did you ever notice how the guy that has the most trouble ge
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00880.html (11,574 bytes)

51. [TenTec] Filter Tap settings / NR etc. (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:26:11 -0700
I have read a few statements here concerning NR and filter tap settings and audio distortion and other perceived effects of the DSP filter system on the ORION II. I've read the manual too... The filt
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00387.html (9,833 bytes)

52. Re: [TenTec] Sweep on OII (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:03:04 -0700
Carl, It is nice to see reason on this reflector. I just want to say that your software is great. I use it a lot, especially for digital modes with MixW and for shortwave listening. You have a good p
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00607.html (11,065 bytes)

53. Re: [TenTec] V2, TT where are we going? (score: 1)
Author: ron@morell.us
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:22:13 -0800
Reading the mail on this reflector is interesting and sometimes informative... My experience in communicating with Ten Tec on the ORION II issues I've had that concerned me, were completely resolved
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01238.html (16,135 bytes)

54. [TenTec] The ORION II sure makes me happy (score: 1)
Author: ron@morell.us
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:33:19 -0800
After considering all the discussion on the short comings and the anomalies of the ORION here on the reflector, I just have to say, in my practical use of the ORION II, it meets my expectations. It i
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01281.html (9,151 bytes)

55. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews? (score: 1)
Author: ron@morell.us
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:46:27 -0800
Hello Dave, I like the IC PRO III for many reasons. One reason is it is less expensive than the O2. One reason is it works very well and is fairly intuitive to use. One reason is it has a nice sweep
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00105.html (11,032 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] Orion II questions (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:45:58 -0700
Joe, On my O2 using VER. 2.028, the RF gain is reduced from 100 to 60 or thereabouts when turning the multi knob slowly. The S-meter reading moves from 0 to S9 with this adjustment. When adjusting th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00206.html (9,584 bytes)

57. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:59:36 -0700
Dave, Near as I can tell the only thing broke is the AM transmitter and the AM monitor. All other functins seem to work FB here in the applications I use. CW, Digi modes, SSB, Shortwave listening, al
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00209.html (9,300 bytes)

58. Re: [TenTec] Ocean noise (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:14:25 -0700
This is a very strange thread. I've never heard Ocean noise on my ORION... What am I doing wrong, that I don't get to hear this particular noise? I have heard static and natural interference type noi
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00391.html (25,089 bytes)

59. [TenTec] Fantastic Service (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:25:08 -0700
I sent the O2 in for service on Friday last week. Sent it UPS 3 day select. I received it back from Ten Tec today! Thursday, a six day turn around from my door to my door. Wow! The work was done and
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00795.html (7,809 bytes)

60. Re: [TenTec] LW receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 17:44:09 -0800
Tom, Ineresting idea of two AM broadcast stations producing the signal at 260 KHz, but as I did not hear any signal but the 1160 KHz station there, I think it is probably a product of the IF mixer. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00074.html (9,301 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu