Mail Archive Search: <+from:rsoifer@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:rsoifer@aol.com: 310 ]

Total 310 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TenTec] Orion II firmware (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 13:59:33 -0400 (EDT); It may be subjective, but I like the NR in 2.044A a lot better than the one in 2.039d. The sweep display seems faster too, which makes it more useful. Or, am I just imagining it? 73 Ray W2RS In a mes; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00323.html (7,603 bytes)
102. Re: [TenTec] Orion II firmware (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:09:55 -0400 (EDT); T-T had a display fast enough to be really useful as an operating aid. It was the waterfall display in 2.041XT. Yes, it looked kinda washed out on SSB, but I'm mainly a CW op and it was a real help.; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00327.html (11,926 bytes)
103. Re: [TenTec] Orion II running 2.044A (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:50:11 -0400 (EDT); I haven't done the battery reset but I did do a master reset. No problems transmitting on any band. Suggest you try re-installing the firmware. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 9/20/2010 3:26:32 P.M. G; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00168.html (7,536 bytes)
104. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:47:24 -0400 (EDT); As a longtime Argo V (and Orion II) owner, my "wish list" for an "Argo VI" (or whatever it's called), besides power level, includes: Better SSB audio Amplifier keying 6-meter coverage NR I'm currentl; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00271.html (10,221 bytes)
105. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:52:49 -0400 (EDT); Yes, and the KWM-2 that I bought in 1962 for $1150 works out to $8313 today, nearly twice the price of my Orion II. It obviously has none of those modern bells and whistles, but the good news is that; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00320.html (12,695 bytes)
106. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle and the legacy TTs (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:42:51 -0400 (EDT); Joe, As an "old head" I do know what you're saying. I have an FT-102, which was my main HF radio from 1984 to 2005. (It's now "retired," on the shelf.) Its receiver was "famous" in its day, especiall; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00338.html (10,552 bytes)
107. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:51:43 -0400 (EDT); There is something to this issue about QST reviews. As I recall, the reviewer of the Orion II said something like "I don't like the feel of this radio because I'm used to Icom and I can't operate it; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00348.html (13,476 bytes)
108. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:21:47 -0400 (EDT); Rick, It's been many years since I was a serious contester (I dabble a bit nowadays but I'm really a DXer), so this is really more of a question than a comment. I would have thought (perhaps incorrec; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00359.html (10,304 bytes)
109. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:42:31 -0400 (EDT); Rick, Jim, and others, Tnx for the info. As you say, different strokes..... 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 9/28/2010 6:31:10 P.M. GMT Standard Time, Rick@DJ0IP.de writes: For the very serious contest; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00374.html (14,731 bytes)
110. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc. (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:20:24 -0400 (EDT); Nice post, Joe. A lot of buckshot in that one shell. Thank - especially for replying in the spirit I intended my post in. Maybe this Eagle is the right balance between old style and approach and new; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00405.html (7,480 bytes)
111. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Information (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:49:38 -0400 (EDT); Guys, There is yet another side to this Eagle discussion: ease of use. At our club station here in the desert, a kind member donated a Yaesu MkV. We interfaced it to our 3-el SteppIR, and waited for; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00442.html (8,836 bytes)
112. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:09:00 -0400 (EDT); Well said. The QST reviewer of the Orion II was so used to Icom that he evidently had trouble adapting. Personally, Icom's multi-tier menus, such as the one on the 706 MkIIG, drive me bananas, but to; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00017.html (11,811 bytes)
113. Re: [TenTec] Downloads for Orion ll (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 08:30:44 -0500 (EST); Andy, As you can see from the firmware revision history, the main difference is that the NR in 2.044A works a lot better than 2.043B. Three other bugs in 2.043B were also fixed. Otherwise, they are p; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00086.html (8,289 bytes)
114. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 2.044a Questions (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:47:36 -0500 (EST); Jack, Which roofing filter are you using, and are you sure the hardware NB is OFF? 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 11/22/2010 3:30:36 A.M. GMT Standard Time, w4tje@wiredog.com writes: I finally got ar; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00320.html (7,781 bytes)
115. Re: [TenTec] Re 02 2.0444A questions (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:10:10 -0500 (EST); Jack, I'm not sure these are the best settings either, but here's what I do. To me, AGC Slope works best at 1:10 so I leave it there. On SSB, my front panel AGC button is set to Prog, which translate; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00326.html (9,409 bytes)
116. Re: [TenTec] Re 02 2.0444A questions (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:50:03 -0500 (EST); John, I wouldn't know (last time I looked, Inrad didn't make filters for the O II (O II filters are not the same as those for the 565), but that might have changed). In any case, the problem is not t; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00329.html (10,728 bytes)
117. Re: [TenTec] Re 02 2.0444A questions (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:06:26 -0500 (EST); Barry, Most of the time I'd agree with you, but as Jack described his situation, a roofing filter narrower than 6 kHz (be it 2.4 or 1.8) might help. For CW, I generally use 300 Hz, except on 160 wher; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00331.html (12,848 bytes)
118. Re: [TenTec] Re 02 2.0444A questions (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:11:28 -0500 (EST); John, As Barry said, you might want to consider the 1.8 kHz optional filter if you operate SSB in heavy QRM, such as a contest. The other two optional filters, 300 and 600 Hz, are for CW and CW/RTTY,; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00332.html (12,597 bytes)
119. Re: [TenTec] Re 02 2.0444A questions (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:59:05 -0500 (EST); Carl, Sorry about that -- I left out the standard 1000 Hz filter. Looking at my O2, it also came with standard filters of 2400, 6000 and 20,000 Hz. 73 Ray In a message dated 11/22/2010 7:16:20 P.M. G; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00335.html (15,497 bytes)
120. Re: [TenTec] Re 02 2.0444A questions (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:01:00 -0500 (EST); Ok , so I might try a 1.8 filter for ssb and this only helps if I am narrower than 2.4kwith dsp filtering is that correct ? and if I have the filter selection on auto it will kick on only when the ds; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00336.html (16,452 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]