Mail Archive Search: <+from:rsoifer@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:rsoifer@aol.com: 310 ]

Total 310 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:58:00 -0400 (EDT); Hi all, I agree with Gary: the operator makes a big difference. Our brains are all wired differently, but as a rather experienced weak-signal CW op I have difficulty with the notion that, at normal s; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00198.html (14,475 bytes)
182. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:57:19 -0400 (EDT); Jim, Yes, a scope can monitor a range of frequencies at the same time. The ear can't. Actually, I use the Orion II sweep display (v2.044a, set to 36 kHz) to do functions 1-3. It won't identify the st; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00203.html (10,647 bytes)
183. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 11:17:18 -0400 (EDT); Although Bill was writing about the original Orion, he has pretty well summed up the wish list for an Orion III (or Orion II MkII): 1. Sub RX identical to the main RX 2. First IF output with no user; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00212.html (10,935 bytes)
184. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:45:03 -0400 (EDT); John, I, too, can cut Rick some slack personally, but he was the reviewer of the Orion II who said he had difficulty with its operation because he was used to Icom. Rick was honest in his review; the; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00225.html (9,376 bytes)
185. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:56:27 -0400 (EDT); Not only that, but the radios themselves are (in some respects) a moving target. Most modern radios are SDRs, and the firmware keeps changing. The Orion II DSP noise reduction, for example, has chang; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00019.html (11,145 bytes)
186. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:04:54 -0400 (EDT); Yes, it was noise limited. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 9/2/2011 1:46:45 P.M. GMT Standard Time, Rick@DJ0IP.de writes: Phil, it doesn't help much to refer someone to the site with the reviews. If y; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00020.html (13,904 bytes)
187. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:16:15 -0400 (EDT); Hi all, Since we're into subjective impressions, I'll put on my flak jacket and share mine. Looking at Rob Sherwood's table, the top six receivers (FT-5000, K3, Perseus, Flex 5000, Orion I and II) lo; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00118.html (13,237 bytes)
188. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 13:04:14 -0400 (EDT); Jerry, I've never had a Corsair, but know what you mean. In the 1980s my main HF radio was the FT-102/FV-102DM. The receiver was better with the digital VFO switched out. 73 Ray. In a message dated 9; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00127.html (14,519 bytes)
189. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:34:52 -0400 (EDT); Good pointt, Joel. Even within the top group, there are big differences in sub receivers, e.g. the Orion's is general coverage while the K3 is ham band only with better performance. Ye pays yer money; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00140.html (14,934 bytes)
190. Re: [TenTec] OII VOX settings (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:04:29 -0400 (EDT); FWIW, my VOX settings for the 707 mic are VOX trip level 5%, ANTI-VOX 20% and VOX hang 0.60. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 9/16/2011 4:56:13 P.M. GMT Standard Time, natan1945@gmail.com writes: John,; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00297.html (8,654 bytes)
191. Re: [TenTec] new RX366 sub receiver (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:49:09 -0400 (EDT); John, Since you mention an Orion III, what is planned for it besides the RX366? 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 9/27/2011 12:55:07 P.M. GMT Standard Time, jhenry@tentec.com writes: Current plan is, th; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00445.html (8,224 bytes)
192. Re: [TenTec] new RX366 sub receiver (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:30:28 -0400 (EDT); John, Understood. Thanks for the info, and I'll await more details on the RX366. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 9/27/2011 3:25:29 P.M. GMT Standard Time, jhenry@tentec.com writes: I was only using th; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00447.html (8,420 bytes)
193. Re: [TenTec] Orion II question (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:05:24 -0400 (EDT); Phil, I'm using 2.044a, but many people are still using 2.039d. You can check the revision history on TT's web site to see if the changes are significant to you. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 9/29/2; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00482.html (7,566 bytes)
194. Re: [TenTec] new RX366 sub receiver (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:22:40 -0400 (EDT); I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that it is a version of the Eagle receiver, which is general coverage. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 10/13/2011 9:17:53 P.M. GM; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-10/msg00111.html (10,074 bytes)
195. Re: [TenTec] Orion gain setting (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:25:16 -0500 (EST); Right on Scott. Not only that, but this thread seems to be confusing the 565 and the 566. They're similar, but not identical as to settings. 73 Ray W2RS ______________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00105.html (8,230 bytes)
196. Re: [TenTec] Orion gain setting (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:52:33 -0500 (EST); I have a 566 (2.044a), and find myself using different settings on different bands. I'm mostly a CW DXer, and do very little SSB, so I can see how the settings for casual SSB operating would be diffe; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00107.html (8,120 bytes)
197. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:44:16 -0500 (EST); When I'm wearing headphones, I can't hear the relay. 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00190.html (7,871 bytes)
198. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle left me cold in the CQWW CW contest. (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:18:18 -0500 (EST); Hi John, Any news on the RX366 upgrade for the Orion II? 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00424.html (7,819 bytes)
199. Re: [TenTec] RX366 Update (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:35:51 -0500 (EST); Many thanks, John. Keep up the good work. 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00434.html (6,732 bytes)
200. Re: [TenTec] RX366 Update (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:25:37 -0500 (EST); Stephen, As I understand it, the RX366 is basically the Eagle receiver. That has room for 3 roofing filters. So, if TT supplies one, we would need two more to fill out the set. I don't know what, if; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00441.html (7,023 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]