Mail Archive Search: <+from:rsoifer@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:rsoifer@aol.com: 310 ]

Total 310 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [TenTec] eq (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 12:06:24 -0500 (EST); Rod, You must be thinking of the 565, because the settings on my 566 are different (v2.044A) 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 12/5/2010 3:59:08 P.M. GMT Standard Time, w3krq@dejazzd.com writes: TEN TEC; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00120.html (7,383 bytes)
182. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:28:01 -0500 (EST); I seem to get the best reports with my Orion II's TX EQ flat, bass roll-off at 150 Hz, and TX bandwidth at 2850 Hz. The mic is a T-T 707. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 12/6/2010 7:22:43 P.M. GMT Sta; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00163.html (11,265 bytes)
183. Re: [TenTec] was OT: Indoor Antenna: re B&W type terminated dipoles (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:36:04 -0500 (EST); Theoretical efficiency is usually figured as if the antenna is in free space, but of course it isn't. Height above ground, ground characteristics, surrounding objects, etc., all must be taken into ac; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00187.html (11,390 bytes)
184. Re: [TenTec] was OT: Indoor Antenna: re B&W type terminated dipoles (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:51:01 -0500 (EST); Jim, As I recall it was a 100-watt bulb, written up in QST some years ago. A Slinky dipole beat it, though. Then there's always the beer can vertical: 43 cans and a Coke bottle insulator. 73 Ray W2RS; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00269.html (9,320 bytes)
185. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:09:00 -0400 (EDT); Well said. The QST reviewer of the Orion II was so used to Icom that he evidently had trouble adapting. Personally, Icom's multi-tier menus, such as the one on the 706 MkIIG, drive me bananas, but to; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00017.html (12,444 bytes)
186. Re: [TenTec] Downloads for Orion ll (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 08:30:44 -0500 (EST); Andy, As you can see from the firmware revision history, the main difference is that the NR in 2.044A works a lot better than 2.043B. Three other bugs in 2.043B were also fixed. Otherwise, they are p; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00086.html (8,336 bytes)
187. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 2.044a Questions (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:47:36 -0500 (EST); Jack, Which roofing filter are you using, and are you sure the hardware NB is OFF? 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 11/22/2010 3:30:36 A.M. GMT Standard Time, w4tje@wiredog.com writes: I finally got ar; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00320.html (7,897 bytes)
188. Re: [TenTec] Re 02 2.0444A questions (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:10:10 -0500 (EST); Jack, I'm not sure these are the best settings either, but here's what I do. To me, AGC Slope works best at 1:10 so I leave it there. On SSB, my front panel AGC button is set to Prog, which translate; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00326.html (9,907 bytes)
189. Re: [TenTec] Re 02 2.0444A questions (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:50:03 -0500 (EST); John, I wouldn't know (last time I looked, Inrad didn't make filters for the O II (O II filters are not the same as those for the 565), but that might have changed). In any case, the problem is not t; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00329.html (12,140 bytes)
190. Re: [TenTec] Re 02 2.0444A questions (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:06:26 -0500 (EST); Barry, Most of the time I'd agree with you, but as Jack described his situation, a roofing filter narrower than 6 kHz (be it 2.4 or 1.8) might help. For CW, I generally use 300 Hz, except on 160 wher; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00331.html (13,241 bytes)
191. Re: [TenTec] Re 02 2.0444A questions (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:11:28 -0500 (EST); John, As Barry said, you might want to consider the 1.8 kHz optional filter if you operate SSB in heavy QRM, such as a contest. The other two optional filters, 300 and 600 Hz, are for CW and CW/RTTY,; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00332.html (13,209 bytes)
192. Re: [TenTec] Re 02 2.0444A questions (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:59:05 -0500 (EST); Carl, Sorry about that -- I left out the standard 1000 Hz filter. Looking at my O2, it also came with standard filters of 2400, 6000 and 20,000 Hz. 73 Ray In a message dated 11/22/2010 7:16:20 P.M. G; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00335.html (15,310 bytes)
193. Re: [TenTec] Re 02 2.0444A questions (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:01:00 -0500 (EST); Ok , so I might try a 1.8 filter for ssb and this only helps if I am narrower than 2.4kwith dsp filtering is that correct ? and if I have the filter selection on auto it will kick on only when the ds; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00336.html (16,265 bytes)
194. Re: [TenTec] Re 02 2.0444A questions (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:55:17 -0500 (EST); are the filters just snap in ? 2.4 to below a For helps activity). have 2nd am what I to 2400, Bob does maybe try prefer _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@con; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00340.html (19,461 bytes)
195. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor Antenna (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:09:35 -0500 (EST); Another possible alternative, depending on your state law, is a flagpole vertical. Here in Arizona, state law allows homeowners to display the American flag, military service, POW/MIA, the state and; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00471.html (11,217 bytes)
196. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor antenna (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:05:23 -0500 (EST); Jerry writes: There is another school of thought that when those preferred lengths don't fit the premises or the wire on hand, is that the preferred length is the length that fits between the support; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00478.html (13,584 bytes)
197. Re: [TenTec] Attic antennas (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:54:48 -0500 (EST); John, If I'm not mistaken, the Tarheel is using your mobile home as a ground plane. If you put it in your attic, you will have to make an equivalent ground plane for it to function properly. If you d; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00485.html (9,530 bytes)
198. Re: [TenTec] OT indoor antenna (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:04:41 -0500 (EST); Rob, The morons may be in charge, but we have to deal with them since they are. TV antennas, to some degree, are protected by Federal statute. At least one ham antenna maker, Force 12, makes a TV ant; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00551.html (7,731 bytes)
199. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor Antenna (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:07:34 -0500 (EST); I know nothing about that situation, but have seen HOAs here in Arizona that prohibit any use of the property for transmitting. Wonder how they open their garage doors. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00553.html (9,510 bytes)
200. Re: [TenTec] Orion II running 2.044A (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:50:11 -0400 (EDT); I haven't done the battery reset but I did do a master reset. No problems transmitting on any band. Suggest you try re-installing the firmware. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 9/20/2010 3:26:32 P.M. G; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00168.html (7,755 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]