Mail Archive Search: <+from:rsoifer@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:rsoifer@aol.com: 310 ]

Total 310 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:47:24 -0400 (EDT); As a longtime Argo V (and Orion II) owner, my "wish list" for an "Argo VI" (or whatever it's called), besides power level, includes: Better SSB audio Amplifier keying 6-meter coverage NR I'm currentl; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00271.html (11,188 bytes)
202. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:52:49 -0400 (EDT); Yes, and the KWM-2 that I bought in 1962 for $1150 works out to $8313 today, nearly twice the price of my Orion II. It obviously has none of those modern bells and whistles, but the good news is that; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00320.html (13,604 bytes)
203. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle and the legacy TTs (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:42:51 -0400 (EDT); Joe, As an "old head" I do know what you're saying. I have an FT-102, which was my main HF radio from 1984 to 2005. (It's now "retired," on the shelf.) Its receiver was "famous" in its day, especiall; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00338.html (10,435 bytes)
204. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:51:43 -0400 (EDT); There is something to this issue about QST reviews. As I recall, the reviewer of the Orion II said something like "I don't like the feel of this radio because I'm used to Icom and I can't operate it; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00348.html (13,344 bytes)
205. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:21:47 -0400 (EDT); Rick, It's been many years since I was a serious contester (I dabble a bit nowadays but I'm really a DXer), so this is really more of a question than a comment. I would have thought (perhaps incorrec; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00359.html (10,873 bytes)
206. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:42:31 -0400 (EDT); Rick, Jim, and others, Tnx for the info. As you say, different strokes..... 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 9/28/2010 6:31:10 P.M. GMT Standard Time, Rick@DJ0IP.de writes: For the very serious contest; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00374.html (14,541 bytes)
207. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc. (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:20:24 -0400 (EDT); Nice post, Joe. A lot of buckshot in that one shell. Thank - especially for replying in the spirit I intended my post in. Maybe this Eagle is the right balance between old style and approach and new; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00405.html (7,680 bytes)
208. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Information (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:49:38 -0400 (EDT); Guys, There is yet another side to this Eagle discussion: ease of use. At our club station here in the desert, a kind member donated a Yaesu MkV. We interfaced it to our 3-el SteppIR, and waited for; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00442.html (9,514 bytes)
209. Re: [TenTec] Headphones for ORION I? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:45:35 -0400 (EDT); Hi Charles, I'm using the Sony MDR-7506 with my Orion II. Excellent sound, around $100. If I'm not mistaken, I believe Bill, W4ZV, originally recommended them. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 8/11/201; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00110.html (9,155 bytes)
210. Re: [TenTec] Orion II firmware (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 13:59:33 -0400 (EDT); It may be subjective, but I like the NR in 2.044A a lot better than the one in 2.039d. The sweep display seems faster too, which makes it more useful. Or, am I just imagining it? 73 Ray W2RS In a mes; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00320.html (8,389 bytes)
211. Re: [TenTec] Orion II firmware (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:09:55 -0400 (EDT); T-T had a display fast enough to be really useful as an operating aid. It was the waterfall display in 2.041XT. Yes, it looked kinda washed out on SSB, but I'm mainly a CW op and it was a real help.; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00324.html (11,731 bytes)
212. [TenTec] 707 Mike Settings (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 13:00:29 -0400 (EDT); Hi, FWIW, for the time being I've settled on the following Orion II settings for the 707 mike: For normal SSB operation: TX EQ 0, TX Filter BW 2850, LF Rolloff 150, H/W MIC Gain 14.0, VOX Trip Level; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-07/msg00042.html (6,882 bytes)
213. [TenTec] 707 Mike Settings (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 13:03:25 -0400 (EDT); Hi, FWIW, for the time being I've settled on the following Orion II settings for the 707 mike: For normal SSB operation: TX EQ 0, TX Filter BW 2850, LF Rolloff 150, H/W MIC Gain 14.0, VOX Trip Level; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-07/msg00043.html (6,923 bytes)
214. Re: [TenTec] Who is doing true FSK with the ORION? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 15:42:06 -0400 (EDT); I have done it with my Orion II and US Interface Navigator, with MixW software. I have, however, switched to AFSK because it's more convenient -- I can move the TX/RX frequency by clicking on the des; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-07/msg00059.html (7,942 bytes)
215. [TenTec] RTTY/PSK and the 707 Mike (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:43:35 -0400 (EDT); Hi, This isn't a bug in the hardware or firmware, more like a bug in the operator (me) that brings up a need for very clear instructions. Last night I put my Orion II on RTTY for the first time since; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-07/msg00082.html (7,372 bytes)
216. Re: [TenTec] TenTec OrionII vs Orion (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:36:19 -0400 (EDT); The Sherwood test data for the top receivers (K3, Flex 5000, Orion, Orion II) do not show what I would call major differences in performance from one to another. Given that, if value for money is use; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-07/msg00211.html (8,633 bytes)
217. Re: [TenTec] TenTec OrionII vs Orion (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:00:03 -0400 (EDT); Bill makes good points, but for the benefit of newcomers and others unfamiliar with the radios, we should probably add, by way of clarification, that the Orion v2 and Orion II firmware are similar bu; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-07/msg00215.html (8,882 bytes)
218. Re: [TenTec] Orion with Interface (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:36:25 -0400 (EDT); John, Depending on what software you're using and what you want it to do, Ten-Tec radios can operate digi modes without an interface, using only a sound-card-to-AUX-port cable that is available from; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-07/msg00234.html (7,881 bytes)
219. Re: [TenTec] ARGO V (516) Mobile (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:42:27 -0400 (EDT); My Argo V spends most of its time these days as the driver of my 1208 transverter -- much safer for the 1208 than trying to drive it with a 100-watt radio. However, I've had good results operating th; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-07/msg00268.html (9,407 bytes)
220. Re: [TenTec] Age of Argonaut V (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:49:17 EDT; Hi Steve, I bought mine new in 2005. The S/N is 10C10244. You might try asking Stan at T-T. If anyone knows, he would. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 6/1/2010 4:23:36 P.M. GMT Standard Time, restonha; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-06/msg00003.html (7,373 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]