Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rsoifer@aol.com: 310 ]

Total 310 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [TenTec] Orion II AF AGC (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:04:39 EDT
Hi Ron, Yes, it's the NR. When the NR is off, the audio output with AF AGC is reasonable. With NR in, even NR=1, the audio output is extremely low -- I have to turn the AF gain all the way up to hear
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-07/msg00083.html (9,268 bytes)

282. Re: [TenTec] Orion RTTY Interface (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:22:19 EDT
I've had good results with the US Interface Navigator into the aux input of my O II. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 4/2/2009 2:38:23 A.M. GMT Standard Time, n0kma@att.net writes: I just use the accy
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00019.html (8,371 bytes)

283. Re: [TenTec] Orion II - 2.041 XL is Posted (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 11:16:06 EST
Hi all, I'm at a bit of a disadvantage here because my O II is at my other QTH and I haven't had a chance to try 2.041XL yet. Reading the comments, however, gives me the impression that the improveme
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00003.html (11,814 bytes)

284. Re: [TenTec] Orion II - 2.041 XL is Posted (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 08:49:25 EST
Thanks to all of you who responded to this query. When I get back to Arizona, and my O II, I'll download the new firmware and try it. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 3/1/2009 4:16:44 P.M. GMT Standard
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00112.html (12,598 bytes)

285. Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up? (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:09:23 EDT
I would suspect that something is arcing over at the higher RF voltage. You might try tying the ends of the feedline together and feeding it as a single wire on 160. GL, Ray W2RS In a message dated 3
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00320.html (10,121 bytes)

286. Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up? (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:20:01 EDT
Yes, and another advantage of doing that is that you wouldn't be using the balun, thus avoiding the saturation problem that Jerry brought up. 73 Ray In a message dated 3/18/2009 2:17:44 P.M. GMT Stan
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00323.html (12,432 bytes)

287. Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up? (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:03:34 EDT
Yes, absolutely, the better the ground system you have, the better this (or any vertical antenna) will work. But don't be scared off -- just use the best ground system your QTH will allow. In my old
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00328.html (10,854 bytes)

288. Re: [TenTec] G5RV (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:09:18 EST
Bob, You're right that it would no longer be a G5RV. As you know, the G5RV was originally designed to present a reasonably low impedance on the 80, 40 and 20 meter bands. That's all. It worked satisf
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00004.html (13,330 bytes)

289. Re: [TenTec] Digital on Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:47:17 EST
Those settings seem right to me. I also have my AUX input set to 100 (full on), MIC input off, and control the input level from the computer and/or interface. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 2/4/2009
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00086.html (12,776 bytes)

290. Re: [TenTec] Open sourcing again (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:16:13 EST
Well, I obviously can't speak for anyone but myself, but if I had wanted an open source system I'd have bought a Flex. I'd humbly suggest that anyone who wants open source simply go and do that. 73 R
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00379.html (10,137 bytes)

291. [TenTec] OT: Fwd: [W1mx_alumni] W1MX 100th Anniversary Events (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:45:17 EST
Sorry for the off-topic post, but I know there are many former W1MX members on the TT list, some of whom might not have seen this. If you're interested, go to the web site mentioned for further info.
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00063.html (9,509 bytes)

292. Re: [TenTec] Orion II....AUX I/O Direct to Computer for Digi? (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:10:45 EST
I use the Navigator with my O2 and Argo 5. Works great. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 1/30/2009 1:06:53 A.M. GMT Standard Time, jmiller1706@cfl.rr.com writes: I am using the sound card direct to the
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00428.html (9,548 bytes)

293. Re: [TenTec] G5RV (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:31:39 EST
I don't consider myself an expert, but in my considerable experience with G5RVs and similar antennas, any G5RV can be improved by putting an antenna tuner between the coax and the balanced feedline.
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00480.html (9,460 bytes)

294. Re: [TenTec] Recommendation for Orion II Interface? (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:08:26 EST
I've had great success with the US Interface Navigator. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 12/3/2008 6:30:56 P.M. GMT Standard Time, fraz1@bellsouth.net writes: I use a laptop with USB port and Vista OS
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00051.html (9,286 bytes)

295. Re: [TenTec] Experience with 300 HZ filter in Orion II? (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:09:35 EST
I have them both, and hardly ever use the 600. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 12/3/2008 6:21:12 P.M. GMT Standard Time, fraz1@bellsouth.net writes: I have the 600 Hz filter installed. Anyone have goo
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00052.html (8,063 bytes)

296. Re: [TenTec] Recommendation for Orion II Interface? (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:32:13 EST
Thanks for both replies Ray. Do you use Vista with the Navigator? (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010) _______________________________________________ TenT
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00056.html (10,706 bytes)

297. Re: [TenTec] O2 vs K3 (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:50:04 EST
George, I don't have a K3 but I second your motion about the O2 noise blanker. I find the HW noise blanker a big help on 160 but only when there are no strong signals to pump it. The DSP NB doesn't d
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00287.html (7,311 bytes)

298. Re: [TenTec] PSK 31 with the Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:45:06 EST
I don't know the Rascal interface box but I am running PSK31 on my Orion II using the US Interface Navigator. I have the O II AUX gain set all the way up at 100 and control the audio input level with
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00326.html (8,654 bytes)

299. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Fan Disappointment.... (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:05:09 EST
The O II meets my current needs, and I do not consider the K3's incremental performance improvement to be worth trading rigs for. However, when I next consider a new main station radio, I will certai
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-11/msg00158.html (13,839 bytes)

300. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Fan Disappointment.... (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:08:54 EST
sofware **One site has it all. Your email accounts, your social networks, and the things you love. Try the new AOL.com today!(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212962939x1200825291/aol?redir=h
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-11/msg00159.html (9,745 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu