Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:s56a@bit.si: 109 ]

Total 109 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 Product Test available (score: 1)
Author: "Mario" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 01:31:18 +0100
are the sound card used and not the SDR-1000 hardware itself. TX noise spectra shows a lot of DDS distortions which also affect RX performance. 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00699.html (7,237 bytes)

2. [TenTec] When is a filter roofing? (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 21:54:23 +0200
Roof should stand ABOVE the house (1,8 - 29,7 MHz). With DSP (and DDS) added. 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00288.html (7,290 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Superhet Receiver Types? (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 22:02:00 +0200
converts the incoming signal directly to audio. Conversion or mixing is frequency translation (DC = 0 IF) with local oscilator and should not be confused with signal detection (BFO for CW/SSB or DSP
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00289.html (6,994 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] When is a filter roofing? (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:28:50 +0200
flat (LPF) roof while HF needs Inv. Vee shaped one!73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00342.html (7,715 bytes)

5. [TenTec] G3SJX IC-7800 review (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 16:38:41 +0200
Some TT readers might be interested in RSGB review of IC-7800. G3SJX noted second oscilator noise being higher then IC-756 or Orion. There are 5 GIF files ending in 1-5 at: http://artinian.bit.si/ic7
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00352.html (7,966 bytes)

6. RE: [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this getting covered here? (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:53:52 +0200
options open to protect my American civil liberties. I humbly apologize for puting G3SJX IC-7800 review on my homepage and announcing it on TT forum in my European tradition of culture, sciences and
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00432.html (7,408 bytes)

7. RE: [TenTec] G3SJX IC-7800 review (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:41:48 +0200
Similar ARRL Orion test shows first 20 msec dit halved on RF output and delayed 23 msec, just in the middle of RX time space! Second dit is delayed 22 msec and choped 30 %. It is still positioned wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00435.html (8,632 bytes)

8. [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 23:35:57 +0200
What were AGC setings on tested radios? 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00526.html (8,157 bytes)

9. [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this being covered here (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 23:39:17 +0200
Orion v. Pro III http://www.qsl.net/ab4oj/icom/ic756pro3/756p3.html Price seems to be right, very close to Orion! 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00527.html (7,142 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Where do the filters go (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:11:15 +0200
It is actually your brain crying "give me some music" instead of single breaking tone or 3 kHz limited audio. My ears have formed LPF with 3 kHz notch of -25 dB after 40+ years of hamradio even with
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00556.html (8,478 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:31:33 +0200
the Omni tells me something. Question is: What did it tell me? PRO has very fast AGC attack in order to prevent DSP ADC overflow. It also recovers more RX gain between dot pauses and therefore signa
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00557.html (8,858 bytes)

12. [TenTec] Digital Signal Processing (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:48:34 +0200
signal processing." Some of the numerous functions you mentioned are NOT digital SIGNAL processing but general purpose digital control done by separate Motorola CPU. 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00680.html (7,200 bytes)

13. [TenTec] RE: DIgital Signal Processing (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 23:00:45 +0200
Analog signals are first converted into digital form for DSP. DSP output can be a single control bit or another analog signal thru D/A converter. There is no need for DSP of digital impulses directl
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00722.html (7,762 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] DSP and such (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:49:27 +0200
simply does not allow the A to D and DSP stages to ever see signals that are outside of those component's own dynamic range. IF DSP is done on the upper end of audio frequencies (36 kHz) with 24 bit
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00752.html (7,391 bytes)

15. [TenTec] Friedrichshafen 2004 (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:13:29 +0100
It was nice to have two presentations on SDR from the world best young salesman and contester! I only wished Orion had pasive FET mixer with IP3=37 dBm :-) 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00034.html (7,895 bytes)

16. [TenTec] Friedrichshafen 2004 (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 21:46:10 +0200
Please add "astonishing" K2 and Orion image and IF rejection numbers for complete HF DR! 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00043.html (7,911 bytes)

17. RE: [TenTec] Friedrichshafen 2004 (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 12:55:53 +0200
I spoiled my English accent aquired in 1970/2 upon visiting USA in 1976 :-) Great on W4PA PPS presentations! You must add your intro photo in BV outfit. 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00054.html (7,976 bytes)

18. [TenTec] An example of changing Orion firmware to meet expectations (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 22:35:23 +0200
community: -- VFO's are not receivers -- Once upon a time when IF was within HF working range, there were separate boxes for receiver, transmitter and later even VFO! But there is no "chicken or egg
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00224.html (7,291 bytes)

19. [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:56:51 +0200
Icom marketing hype about the 7800. Apart from +37 dBm IP3, I was amazed by IC-7800 nonexistent IMD3 AF products even with fast AGC. This alleviates the needs for expensive sharp front end filters.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00538.html (8,846 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 19:01:24 +0200
P.S. Compare IC-7800 and Orion TX output spectra. Orion RX is the same on HF IF and image frequencies. Which radio would you prefer in multiband environment? 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00539.html (8,798 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu