Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:s56a@bit.si: 109 ]

Total 109 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Orion in CQWW CW (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 05:37:17 -0500
And the second RX has better image rejection then the main Orion RX... Impresive TX noise figures! Also excellent main RX 9 MHz IF supression... 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU P.S. W4PA Yahoo mailbox overfl
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00076.html (8,800 bytes)

62. [TenTec] Re Orion on Elecraft's Receiver Summary Page (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 15:07:56 -0500
Orion uses the same 4 FET mixer as Yaesu FT1K. It is followed by fixed gain Norton amplifier (FGA), two 9 MHz crystals, NB, standard selectable filters 1 - 15 kHz, FGA, optional 250 or 500 Hz filters
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00110.html (8,292 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 04:05:09 -0500
I occassionally add MSc EE when I reply to some nonsense about radios! Or if posting comes from alum.MIT.edu like AD1C :-) 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU of get
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00125.html (10,306 bytes)

64. [TenTec] Orion Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:54:19 -0500
on top and even show the Orion's IP2 numbers in the "red." USA transceivers have traditionally poor IP2 numbers not acceptable in EU BCI environment. There seems to be a problem with Orion TX audio
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00412.html (8,685 bytes)

65. [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 07:07:35 -0500
Radio BDR at 20kHz BDR at 5kHz BDR at 1kHz K2 136 126 TBD Orion 129 130 TBD FT-1000MP 142 119 TBD We often check $$$ numbers for price/performance ratio in poorer countries! It was mentioned here on
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00463.html (8,032 bytes)

66. [TenTec] Re: Orion IP2 numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 07:13:34 -0500
what caused this discrepancy -- and whether it was an anomaly of the radio that ARRL had for test, or whether it effects 'em all. You might have noticed that most of ARRL test numbers are slightly w
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00464.html (9,272 bytes)

67. [TenTec] Re: Orion IP2 numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 07:36:11 -0500
number represents anything of importance to users IP2 is certainly NOT important at Hawaii, but we can hear plenty of music and propaganda on dead 10/15/20 m bands every 5 kHz in EU! 73 de Mario, S5
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00468.html (8,801 bytes)

68. [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 12:55:32 -0500
Real world experience is expressed at www.eham.net in numbers AGAIN and almost all rigs are in top 4-5 class! Radio test in dB numbers is quite complex and some expertise is needed to interpret them
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00488.html (8,444 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] Orion--K2--706 & SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:13:03 -0500
The fuller and richer the audio (While staying 2.8Kc's wide or less, not 3-4kc's wide like the Wi-Fi SSB spectrum hogs) the easier it is for me to understand the weak ones. SSB speech should be DIST
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00534.html (8,237 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] Orion--K2--706 & SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 16:43:38 -0500
Huge horizontal RX loop might be a good aproximation for a very strong BCI in the unique cases of excellent low bands propagation. Funkamateur tests leave a lot to be desired. I'd preffer G3SJX in RS
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00548.html (9,375 bytes)

71. [TenTec] Re: Orion IP2 numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:45:44 -0500
for a little research project of your own, if desired. Hi Scott, Actually I did a small Excel project with Eham data in order to evaluate TT and K2 against 4 JA rigs. Data is sorted by ratings 1-5 a
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00583.html (13,221 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] Orion--K2--706 (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:27:16 -0500
I was thinking mainly of IP2 test as I warned KF6DX of that TT potential problem at Dayton 2002. Long diversity reception expose doesn't mention the important role of human brain in stereo signals in
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00597.html (7,215 bytes)

73. [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:19:06 -0500
W4ZV, with all due respect, I wouldn't take K1UO result on CQ WW CW on 160 m as a high praise to undisputed Orion RX capabilities! This is such a small single sample: 160: 172 18 62 I often laugh on
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00616.html (8,085 bytes)

74. [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:36:58 -0500
Do you know how far is his vertical from the sea? I accept that as a valid tech argument but majority of users are not aware of it! W0YG case you quote next is rare in big USA. IP2 problems nonexist
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00623.html (8,478 bytes)

75. [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 02:56:33 -0500
the Bavarian Contest Club (BCC) which I am proud to be a member of. We hold both the CW and SSB records. ALL transceivers used for this were Kenwood TS-850's (which is a 1-generation-old "mid-range"
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00637.html (8,462 bytes)

76. [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 03:01:45 -0500
I'll bet your headphones seem a bit tight from time to time. Dave K8MNNO, Sir, I use cheap and light PC SB headset for 300-2.700 Hz audio with ordinary electret microphone on my IC-735 1984 vintage!
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00638.html (8,206 bytes)

77. [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 03:29:07 -0500
and routinely desensed my FT-1000MP whenever he came on the band. Yaesu could have done a much better job with a second mixer which suffers from signals stronger then S9+10 dB. There is no separate
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00639.html (8,126 bytes)

78. [TenTec] Re: Highlights of German Orion Review (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:37:33 -0500
Disclaimer: I have translated this to the best of my ability and believe it reflects the jest of the message portrayed. I take no responsibility for errors in translation and or interpretation. - Ric
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00824.html (9,575 bytes)

79. [TenTec] Re: Orion Expanded Report (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:43:10 -0500
These results are fine under the assumption that image and IF rejection is higher then IMD DR! 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00825.html (8,287 bytes)

80. [TenTec] Re: Repost for Bill about Orion and listing of competitive rigs. (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:51:55 -0500
receiver ratings. I hope we can maintain this in the future! Not for the image rejection and K2 case (<9 MHz) is even worse then Orion (18 MHz)! Once upon a time Collins made a good HF receivers wit
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00826.html (7,179 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
This search system is powered by Namazu