Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:s56a@bit.si: 109 ]

Total 109 documents matching your query.

81. [TenTec] Orion Review By RSGB (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:30:31 +0200
BDR, Phase Noise, etc? Four scaned pages of Radcomm Orion test report can be found at http://artinian.bit.si/slike/orionX.gif where X stands for 1,2,3,4. RSGB takes good care of its members and publ
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00520.html (6,744 bytes)

82. [TenTec] Friedrichshafen 2004 (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:13:29 +0100
It was nice to have two presentations on SDR from the world best young salesman and contester! I only wished Orion had pasive FET mixer with IP3=37 dBm :-) 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU ___________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00034.html (6,929 bytes)

83. [TenTec] Friedrichshafen 2004 (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 21:46:10 +0200
Please add "astonishing" K2 and Orion image and IF rejection numbers for complete HF DR! 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00043.html (7,319 bytes)

84. RE: [TenTec] Friedrichshafen 2004 (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 12:55:53 +0200
I spoiled my English accent aquired in 1970/2 upon visiting USA in 1976 :-) Great on W4PA PPS presentations! You must add your intro photo in BV outfit. 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU _____________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00054.html (7,745 bytes)

85. [TenTec] An example of changing Orion firmware to meet expectations (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 22:35:23 +0200
community: -- VFO's are not receivers -- Once upon a time when IF was within HF working range, there were separate boxes for receiver, transmitter and later even VFO! But there is no "chicken or egg
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00224.html (7,289 bytes)

86. [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:56:51 +0200
Icom marketing hype about the 7800. Apart from +37 dBm IP3, I was amazed by IC-7800 nonexistent IMD3 AF products even with fast AGC. This alleviates the needs for expensive sharp front end filters.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00538.html (7,952 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 19:01:24 +0200
P.S. Compare IC-7800 and Orion TX output spectra. Orion RX is the same on HF IF and image frequencies. Which radio would you prefer in multiband environment? 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU _________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00539.html (7,545 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:52:35 +0200
composite noise and rx phase noise is incredibly high? Where did you find these IC-7800 data? G3SJX noted the increase of impresive low Orion oscilator noise away from carrier. 73 de Mario, S56A, N1
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00546.html (8,152 bytes)

89. [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 00:01:01 +0200
probably wouldn't be interested. ;-) I built radio above K2/Orion class with 9 MHz IF and +23 dBm diode mixer in 1970s. The only progress since is in DDS, optional DSP and IF above 2 x 30 MHz. 73 de
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00554.html (8,388 bytes)

90. [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:13:50 +0200
expense of very poor close-spaced IMD and BDR performance. The unique DSP contribution to HF RX is smart auto-notch and noise reduction, the rest is marketing! IF above 15 MHz removes superhet image
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00573.html (8,771 bytes)

91. Re: [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:19:15 +0200
We were forced to use our brains before DSP. This is not very popular these digital days :-) 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contes
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00575.html (8,292 bytes)

92. Re: [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:00:51 +0200
not so simple to find a 500 Hz BW filter for $200 at 45-65 MHz. I mentioned antenna filters available at that price. You wouldn't like to receive just 500 Hz on any band so they are 15 kHz wide but
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00600.html (8,608 bytes)

93. [TenTec] DSP dynamic range (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:08:19 +0200
Kenwood radios (maybe a very few the TS-870S). CN8WW M/M world records were made with a lot of TS-850s. I enjoyed TS-2000 at 3V8BB against TS-570 with a pumping DSP AGC. Let me repeat once again, we
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00601.html (7,526 bytes)

94. Re: [TenTec] Congrats to Scott W4PA! (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 00:16:59 +0200
I let filters and selectivity and digital processing do most of the hard work for me. Don't forget to switch AFC ON! Our champ missed a few off-frequency callsigns at Dayton 2002 pile-up :-) 73 de M
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00609.html (7,720 bytes)

95. Re: [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 00:30:25 +0200
which is the topic we were discussing. I am always looking at RX covering whole HF band with close spaced interference problems on rare occasions. The best RX is the one which statistically receives
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00611.html (8,508 bytes)

96. [TenTec] When is a filter roofing? (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 21:54:23 +0200
Roof should stand ABOVE the house (1,8 - 29,7 MHz). With DSP (and DDS) added. 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00288.html (7,037 bytes)

97. [TenTec] Superhet Receiver Types? (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 22:02:00 +0200
converts the incoming signal directly to audio. Conversion or mixing is frequency translation (DC = 0 IF) with local oscilator and should not be confused with signal detection (BFO for CW/SSB or DSP
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00289.html (7,047 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] When is a filter roofing? (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:28:50 +0200
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 21:54:23 +0200 "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si> writes: flat (LPF) roof while HF needs Inv. Vee shaped one!73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU ___________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00342.html (7,704 bytes)

99. [TenTec] G3SJX IC-7800 review (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 16:38:41 +0200
Some TT readers might be interested in RSGB review of IC-7800. G3SJX noted second oscilator noise being higher then IC-756 or Orion. There are 5 GIF files ending in 1-5 at: http://artinian.bit.si/ic7
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00352.html (7,153 bytes)

100. RE: [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this getting covered here? (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:53:52 +0200
options open to protect my American civil liberties. I humbly apologize for puting G3SJX IC-7800 review on my homepage and announcing it on TT forum in my European tradition of culture, sciences and
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00432.html (6,973 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu