Mail Archive Search: <+from:sdprat@worldnet.att.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:sdprat@worldnet.att.net: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [TenTec] Paragon question (score: 1): Author: "Scott Prather" <sdprat@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:45:59 -0800; Paul-This problem is almost certainly related to the filter relays on the LPF board. Early Paragons used reed relays to select the LPFs, but this was a pretty expensive approach. As a result, in late; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00028.html (9,892 bytes)
2. RE: [TenTec] FS: Paragon II Rare and Beautiful (score: 1): Author: "Scott Prather" <sdprat@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:54:35 -0800; The way the filter bandwidths were written in the original posting (mHz), the units were millihertz, not megahertz. Imagine SSB with a 0.0018 or 0.0024 Hz filter, and AM with a 0.006 Hz filter! Scott; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00578.html (9,321 bytes)
3. RE: [TenTec] FS: Paragon II corrected filter info (score: 1): Author: "Scott Prather" <sdprat@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:57:03 -0800; Whenever it comes up, I always find this argument interesting, especially when it comes to the use of terminology that was in vogue for a long time such as the case with "cycles". There are many peop; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00586.html (10,893 bytes)
4. RE: [TenTec] ParagonII Audio BP Fade Feature Mods (score: 1): Author: "Scott Prather" <sdprat@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 17:00:44 -0800; I would like to thank Steve for posting this information concerning incorrect component values in the Paragon II audio filter circuit. Minutes after I received this e-mail last night, I checked the I; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00758.html (9,572 bytes)
5. RE: [TenTec] Receiver Specs - Orion et al (score: 1): Author: "Scott Prather" <sdprat@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 00:44:43 -0700; Chuck-I agree that the R390A is a great receiver, but the noise floor performance you quoted in a 4 kHz BW make me suspect that you may have a faulty attenuator and/or leakage in your signal generato; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00299.html (11,588 bytes)
6. RE: [TenTec] The Tea Party (score: 1): Author: "Scott Prather" <sdprat@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:46:03 -0800; Stuart-Unfortunately, BPL is also being proposed for transmission lines. In December, Amperion made a press announcement concerning their demo of "multi-megabit" BPL over a 69 kV transmission line. T; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00128.html (9,441 bytes)
7. RE: [TenTec] SKN 7.040 Stream on again (score: 1): Author: "Scott Prather" <sdprat@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 17:14:44 -0800; Paul-Who's running that "K" beacon? It was 579 to 589 here in Seattle last night. Scott N7NB Decided to put my original Novice rig, an HW-16, back on the air during SKN. So the streaming audio was of; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00027.html (8,420 bytes)
8. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter on 60Meters (score: 1): Author: "Scott Prather" <sdprat@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 19:42:22 -0700; Carl-I haven't checked the wording in this particular proceeding, but typically the FCC considers the "occupied bandwidth" to be measured at the -26 dBc points, which represents 99.5% of the transmit; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00211.html (11,779 bytes)
9. RE: [TenTec] Paragon Improvements (score: 1): Author: "Scott Prather" <sdprat@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 20:41:06 -0800; Mark-I have a very early Paragon (S/N 0024X) and a late one (S/N 102XX). The main difference between the two is on the LPF board. The early Paragon used reed relays to select the LPF, this was a very; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00099.html (10,472 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Orion prototype (score: 1): Author: "Scott Prather" <sdprat@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 16:56:57 -0800; Jim-The first receiver (that I'm aware of) to utilize DSP in such a way that the S-meter is independent of the RF Gain, front-end attenuator, preamp, etc. was the Watkins-Johnson HF-1000 back in 1994; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00438.html (13,663 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]