Mail Archive Search: <+from:seay@alaska.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:seay@alaska.net: 117 ]

Total 117 documents matching your query.

101. Auto tuner, was Re: Omni V for QRP (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 10:54:49 -0700; Hmmmmm, All of those you reported, with the exception of the "pumping" qsk, my OMNI-6 has no problem with. And - I have always found the engineering dep't to be much more helpful than the U.S. reps o; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00021.html (10,376 bytes)
102. Omni Six Mods (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Tue, 02 Jul 1996 06:53:13 -0700; I talked this morning to the techs at TenTec regarding the OMNI-6. They said that another change they are routinely making on all Sixes passing through the lab, is on the Passband Tuning Board. Resis; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-07/msg00005.html (6,499 bytes)
103. Omni VI IMD modification questions..... (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del & Jan Seay); Date: Fri, 05 Jul 1996 16:02:01 -0700; Very simple mod, Alan. I'll see if I can do this from their instructions, which has pictures.(I need Pictures!) Locate the PBF/Front End Board, and remove. (Bottom under the shield.) Identify R-14, a; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-07/msg00028.html (7,443 bytes)
104. Omni VI IMD modification questions.. (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del & Jan Seay); Date: Sat, 06 Jul 1996 06:30:44 -0700; Well, whether you can or not, depends on whether you're in a high rf environment. But - the difference in 2nd order intermode distortion between 40dBm and 60 dBm is certainly important in a high perf; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-07/msg00033.html (7,273 bytes)
105. Omni 6 ringing filters (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del & Jan Seay); Date: Sun, 07 Jul 1996 10:26:54 -0700; Hi Jim. All they said was that it effected the ringing problem, and didn't go into anymore detail. My Omni also has C25 from Base of Q4 to ground (off the high side of the rf gain control). de KL7HF; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-07/msg00040.html (7,244 bytes)
106. Omni VI (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Mon, 15 Jul 1996 09:14:59 -0700; Hello Kok. What are the levels you measured on the various harmonics, and what method did you use. In linear service, there is an inherant attenuation of harmonic energy. In addition, TenTec uses goo; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-07/msg00077.html (7,232 bytes)
107. Omni VI (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Mon, 15 Jul 1996 11:26:17 -0700; Hi Steve. Good point. But, that is common on all of the modern day radios. The OMNI-6 has individual card shielding present, which I suppose is all that the engineers consider necessary. In fact, the; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-07/msg00079.html (7,408 bytes)
108. AA5TN (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del & Jan Seay); Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 04:20:47 -0700; Sorry to use the reflector for this, but have lost Bill's E-Mail address. Bill - AA5TN - drop me a note. Del, KL7HF; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-07/msg00089.html (6,031 bytes)
109. OMNI V vfo knob resistance (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 14:04:17 -0700; You can adjust the drag on the OMNI-6 by holding the skirt and turning the main portion of the knob. I never tried it on the OMNI-V when I had it, but the two knobs look alike! de KL7HF; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-07/msg00109.html (7,247 bytes)
110. Omni 6 ringing filters (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 08:54:18 -0700; Steve, N4LQ mentioned a possible cure for the "filter ringing" in his OMNI-6. He found that TenTec had not filtered the regulated voltage entering the IF/AF board. I checked mine, and sure enough! A; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-06/msg00017.html (7,077 bytes)
111. 20m to 6m Transverter Kit (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 12:40:50 -0700; Hi Shelby. It's frequency limits are determined by the transmitter that provides the 14 mHz drive. It is a direct relationship - you move the 14 mHz transmitter/receiver up 5kHz, the 50 mHz signal mo; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-04/msg00039.html (7,243 bytes)
112. OMNI VI oscillation with 500hz filter switched in (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 18:49:33 -0800; I just recently performed the mod that Ten-Tec has for better IMD products. This involves changing one resistor in the Bandpass filter and jumpering another. It lowers the gain just enough to elimina; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-03/msg00012.html (7,822 bytes)
113. Omni VI 2nd order IMD Mod (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 06:40:57 -0800; Hi John. I did the change and in my case, it was worth the effort. It only takes a few minutes (Typical of Ten-Tec repairs) and the problem with ringing on receive disappeared. I assume the gain of t; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-03/msg00030.html (8,102 bytes)
114. Omni VI 2nd order IMD Mod (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 10:16:49 -0800; great deal of sense. The resistance change in the Bandpass filter area is the one I am referring to. Didn't look up the article in FOCUS to see what that was about, just asked Ten Tec when I ordered; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-03/msg00033.html (9,098 bytes)
115. Omni VI filter ringing and "sleep" in CW TX? (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 13:35:34 -0800; Hi Clark. The ringing in mine appeared to be due to just a tad too much rf gain (or if gain,not sure which). They would almost go into oscillation after extended transmit periods. The "Sleeping" was; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-03/msg00039.html (8,309 bytes)
116. FREQ JUMPING (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 06:19:37 -0800; I've seen the same thing. I wonder if it isn't related to a software elimination of the 'Birdies' that were a problem with the OMNI V ? I am sure that's how they got rid of them with the '6'. de KL7H; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-03/msg00044.html (6,809 bytes)
117. OMNI V vs OMNI-6 (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Jan & Del Seay); Date: Tue, 02 Jan 1996 13:31:29 -0800; Well, I understand the similarities, having owned both, but believe me, they ARE NOT the same receivers. There are a number of major changes which have a pronounced effect on the operation, and even; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-01/msg00004.html (7,062 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 117
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]