Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:shristov@ptt.rs: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] OT: SWR & Coax (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:57:21 +0200
Basic facts of physics are as follows. 1. Whenever an AC current flows, there is radiation. There are no exceptions. Also, there are no additional conditions. All that is needed is an AC current flow
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00107.html (8,142 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] OT: SWR & Coax (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 02:02:24 +0200
Ever heard of a coax with the inside current not matching the center conductor current? Exact matching is the essence of coax. If it's coaxial, then the currents match. It's physically impossible fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00154.html (10,811 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Band Scopes (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:25:29 +0200
No, bandscope uses mixer output directly, prior to filtering, exactly as in Orion. No, Orion has a separate ADC fed from main RX mixer output. IF filtering would certainly affect bandscope operation,
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00361.html (9,223 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Lone voice in the wind (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:20:08 +0100
DE N6KB It's worse than that. There are TWO independent frequency references. The obvious one is the TCXO, and the other one is the codec clock. The ways they are combined in the main RX and in the s
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00272.html (9,154 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub-Main synthesizer offsets (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:02:31 +0100
Correct. Correct, but irrelevant. Correct. Frequency synthesis boils down to following formulas: nominal Main RX Freq = A * TCXO + B * Codec clock nominal Sub RX Freq = C * TCXO + D * Codec clock Whe
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00275.html (10,257 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] New Firmware (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:01:13 +0000 (GMT)
... Dear OM, do you have any measurement results? 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00054.html (8,381 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] mic for OII (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:30:05 +0100
I enjoyed the following from Beyerdynamic: MC494, MCE530, MC930, Opus 54, MMX300 (actually a headset). MC930 is true condenser, others are electret. Each of them provides exceptional sound at moderat
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00367.html (7,018 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] RF Ground (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 05:29:44 +0200
An arbitrary point can be taken as a potential reference. The choice itself has no physical consequences. It's just a notational convenience. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA ________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00073.html (8,434 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] RF Ground (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 14:30:33 +0200
Exactly what I was trying to say... ...if there is such a thing as nature's reference point, which I doubt. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00083.html (8,709 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT-1000D RF Compressor versus Ten-Tec 715 RF Clipper... not the same. (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 07:34:35 +0200
Not sure about FT1000D, but FT1000MP/MkV actually performs RF clipping, and it's very cheap, using TA7302P FM IF Amplifier. Users of "external RF Clippers" must be aware of the fact that the processe
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00318.html (8,631 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Orion Backup Battery (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:00:46 +0200
Board A7, schematic file 81917_13.PDF, chip U501 (M48T35AV). With DIP version of the chip, the battery is an integral part of the chip. With SOIC version of the chip, the battery can be separated and
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-08/msg00018.html (7,828 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Orion Backup Battery (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 09:10:58 +0200
Look for M48T35AV chip at the left side of the logic (CPU & DSP) board. The battery (and the crystal for the unused real time clock) is within the black rectangular "SNAPHAT". 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3E
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-08/msg00024.html (7,970 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 output power (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:48:11 +0100
Adjust the ALC SET pot (R179) on the A5 IF Board, beneath the speaker. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00114.html (8,379 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII vs. K3 ? Opinions invited., (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:56:24 +0100
Hi Rick, "full power into 3:1 SWR" is just a myth. Did you ever read such a claim made by TenTec? There is nothing inside TenTec transceivers to make them to DELIVER full power into a mismatched load
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00426.html (9,225 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII vs. K3 ? Opinions invited., (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:22:46 +0100
Your thinking is correct, apart from those 40 W being actually 36 W (60 % of the forward power). The technical fact is that the only difference between a TenTec TX and, say, a Kenwood TX is lack of c
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00435.html (10,278 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Original Orion Firmware (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:10:49 +0300
I have two small items, shouldn't be difficult to fix. 1. In band stacking registers please preserve the full filter state. Currently only BW is preserved, and PBT is not. This makes it very inconven
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00226.html (8,352 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] receiver specifications ---Eagle (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:24:15 +0100
Receiver quality is a much more complex thing than, say, IM dynamic range. IM dynamic range is a kind of limit. Under specific circumstances, if the limit is not exceeded, the IM specification is irr
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00369.html (7,951 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] TT Eagle tuner spec: SWR v. impedance range? (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 17:56:23 +0100
That would be a very good way of specification, if only it was true. "SWR <= 10" is a unambiguous reference to a set of complex impedances, i.e. those inside a certain circle on a Smith diagram. But
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00203.html (7,692 bytes)

19. [TenTec] Balancing Orion 565 VFO knobs (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:27:35 +0200
Has anyone suceeded in balancing Orion 565 VFO knobs? On my Orion 565, both VFO knobs (when left to themselves) return to the same angular position, which is precisely the same on both encoder shafts
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00299.html (7,681 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Balancing Orion 565 VFO knobs (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:44:55 +0200
It's great to know that knobs on 566 do not drift by themselves. I managed today to balance both of my 565 VFO knobs. It was easier than expected, took me 15 minutes per knob. Using an 8 mm slot dril
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00312.html (9,202 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu