Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:steve@karinya.net: 479 ]

Total 479 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] rick's recalcitrant 515 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:01:36 +0100
Rick, That was the only option I could come up with that met the observed symptoms! However, I dismissed it because I didn't think enough of the 5MHz-5.5MHz PTO signal would make it through the MC149
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00092.html (9,195 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] rick's recalcitrant 515 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 20:34:19 +0100
I'm surprised the LO filter can be peaked as low down in frequency as 5.5MHz. The schematic I'm looking at has fixed 10pF capacitors across T1 secondary and primary which means they are about 7uH whe
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00094.html (9,162 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] rick's recalcitrant 515 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 21:21:44 +0100
The filter _isn't_ peaked on 20m - the balanced mixer and the filter are bypassed on 20m and the 5-5.5MHz is injected directly into the LO buffer. Steve G3TXQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00096.html (8,384 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:40:06 +0100
I'm new to this discussion, so if the following point has already been made I apologise: Link-coupled tuners do _not_ inherently provide good common-mode current rejection. If the design includes a g
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00194.html (11,287 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:56:09 +0100
Paul, Tom, W8JI, made the same comment a few years ago; however I've seen these coil sets being made in the FCO manufacturing facility. Of course the design could have simply been copied from the BC-
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00197.html (11,248 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group -tuner and dipoles (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:09:10 +0100
That's not what antenna modelling tells us. For example an 80m horizontal half-wave over average ground has over 7dB more loss at a height of 10ft than it does at 50ft, even though in both cases the
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00215.html (10,789 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group -tuner and dipoles (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:42:31 +0100
A couple of observations: 1) It would benefit from an effective ferrite-cored choke balun at the input rather than the narrowband air-cored balun that he suggests. 2) Apart from the balun, the CM per
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00221.html (10,824 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] [Ten Tec} Corsair II weak weak receive (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:26:44 +0100
Jon, One other check you might want to make while Q6 is removed: on Rx, measure the voltage at the R32/R33 junction, and the voltage at the R31/R32 junction; they should be around 1.7v and 9.5v respe
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-10/msg00059.html (7,897 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] It's getting cold. Perfect antenna weather for a OCF dipole (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:33:43 +0100
And when you want to switch between a variety of transmitters and open-wire-fed antennas, simply use a multi-way open-wire switch like the one here: http://www.bbceng.info/Operations/transmitter_ops/
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-10/msg00104.html (8,767 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] [Ten Tec} Corsair II weak weak receive (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:32:12 +0100
The first thing I'd do is check that R33 is not open-circuit, or has become disconnected at one end or the other. Steve G3TXQ On 19/10/2015 22:40, jon greenwood via TenTec wrote: Update on Corsair: r
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-10/msg00116.html (8,339 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] [Ten Tec} Corsair II weak weak receive (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:35:58 +0100
Well done Jon - it's always good to hear of another Corsair being kept alive! 73, Steve G3TXQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-10/msg00151.html (7,983 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] Definition of Old (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 08:36:54 +0000
You realise you're old when your 5 year old Grandson asks you why hair grows in your ears and nose instead of on your head ;) Steve G3TXQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-10/msg00224.html (7,478 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] [Ten Tec] OCF Antennas - Which commercial antenna is gest? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:37:01 +0100
Joe, A possible explanation - and from my experience the most likely one - is that your "antenna" was actually the braid of your coax, top-loaded by the OCF wire. The differential-mode impedance of a
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-09/msg00085.html (9,422 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] repairs (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:34:29 +0000
Some time ago I made an inventory of all the parts in my CorsairII and PSU, excluding regular resistors and capacitors. I was able to source spares of everything except the programmed MC68705P3 micro
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-10/msg00342.html (9,244 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Zepp? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:42:07 +0100
Just one observation on switchable baluns - don't do it the way Elecraft does it! They take two separate 1:1 current baluns and connect their inputs in parallel; then they connect their outputs in se
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00167.html (9,958 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] SWR is a DUMB Indicator of Antenna Performance (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:55:33 +0100
Be careful using those "additional loss due to SWR" tables; in some circumstances the unmatched cable loss can be *less* than its matched loss. Steve G3TXQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00204.html (10,756 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] SWR is a DUMB Indicator of Antenna Performance (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:54:11 +0100
At HF the losses in most transmission lines are copper losses, not dielectric losses; so the losses are directly proportional to the square of the current. Picture the current standing wave along a m
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00207.html (13,392 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] SWR is a DUMB Indicator of Antenna Performance (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:03:37 +0100
Bob, Another typical application where this stuff matters is a multiband doublet fed with ladderline. For convenience a lot of folk terminate the ladderline at a balun outside the shack, and then use
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00217.html (12,237 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Zepp (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:53:40 +0100
From IEEE Standard Definitions of Terms for Antennas: "2.102 dipole antenna. Any one of a class of antennas producing a radiation pattern approximating that of an elementary electric dipole. Syn: dou
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00220.html (9,374 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] Zepp (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:48:33 +0100
Agreed! It also discredits the notion that: "Any center fed straight wire is a dipole, regardless of how it's length compares the the wavelength you are using it on." Steve G3TXQ N6KB
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00229.html (8,285 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu