Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:steve@karinya.net: 479 ]

Total 479 documents matching your query.

341. Re: [TenTec] PTO rebuild question (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:21:11 +0100
Andrew, No, you don't grease the outside surface of the core! 73, Steve G3TXQ Step says to grease the threads inside the pistol. Done. But are you supposed to also grease the outside surface of the 1
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-09/msg00123.html (7,927 bytes)

342. Re: [TenTec] Another PTO rebuild question: Where does second pin go? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:33:31 +0100
Andrew, I've rebuilt several Corsair II PTOs and I don't recall there being a second pin. Could it simply be a spare which TT ships because it's a part that is easily lost? 73, Steve G3TXQ The other
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-09/msg00130.html (9,419 bytes)

343. Re: [TenTec] Another PTO rebuild question: Where does second pin go? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:15:36 +0100
Andrew, Understood! If I recall correctly, the pin on the Corsair II rebuild kit was a very small "roll pin". If yours is the same, gripping it with pliers and rotating it as you push it in may help;
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-09/msg00136.html (9,015 bytes)

344. Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us... (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 11:54:48 +0100
Can I correct one common misunderstanding about low-pass L-network tuners. The two network configurations (shunt C at the output, or shunt C at the input) do not correspond to Hi-Z and Lo-Z loads, de
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00265.html (9,547 bytes)

345. Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us... (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:11:29 +0100
I'll say it again folks: these are misleading labels! A load of 2+j10 needs the **same** configuration as a load of 1000+j1000: shunt C across the load. A load of 2+j9 needs the **same** configuratio
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00277.html (9,471 bytes)

346. Re: [TenTec] Palstar tuner (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:25:04 +0100
That's not true of all baluns. The flux in the ferrite core of a 1:1 Guanella balun wound with coax depends on the common-mode current, not on the differential-mode current; so it's not directly rela
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00278.html (9,134 bytes)

347. Re: [TenTec] Palstar tuner (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:05:23 +0100
Jerry, Yes, it makes you wonder why tuner manufacturers persist in fitting *voltage* baluns when what we're usually trying to do is balance the *currents*! But I see some of them are learning, and in
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00280.html (8,826 bytes)

348. Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us... (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:11:28 +0100
Gary, The Hi-Z, Lo-Z labels are bad enough, but Palstar really screwed up on their BT1500A tuner - they labelled the configuration switch "High-Pass" "Low-Pass" !!!! Interesting that they reverted to
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00292.html (9,291 bytes)

349. Re: [TenTec] RF Ground (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:13:39 +0100
Have you ever considered that providing a better local RF "ground" could make "RF in the shack" problems worse? Take the example of a half-wave dipole fed with coax that is a multiple of a half-wavel
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00061.html (10,099 bytes)

350. Re: [TenTec] RF Ground (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:31:28 +0100
Gary - not sure what point you are making. Say we did have the perfect RF Ground at the radio, impedance zero, voltage zero. That's when the common-mode current is highest and when the radiation from
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00084.html (10,135 bytes)

351. Re: [TenTec] Triton PTO kit same as Corsair II? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:51:21 +0100
Mike, I'll confirm that! I'm just looking at two un-opened rebuild kits, and neither contains the Drive Rod (90202). Nor did the two kits I've used previously. 73, Steve G3TXQ the part that goes into
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00296.html (10,230 bytes)

352. Re: [TenTec] Triton PTO kit same as Corsair II? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:30:56 +0100
Mike, Interesting - I wonder when you bought those, and if TT have changed their policy? Steve G3TXQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00301.html (9,600 bytes)

353. Re: [TenTec] DDS VFO as remote VFO? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:34:24 +0100
As I understand it, the phase noise performance of a DDS is not as good as a well-designed PTO. Would a better solution be to use a "huff & puff" style stabiliser for the existing PTO? That way you g
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00325.html (8,005 bytes)

354. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II / 263 VFO Question (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:03:03 +0000
Jerry's correct - you need the Pin 2 to Pin 6 jumper to enable the internal Corsair PTO. Steve G3TXQ Needs a jumper on the Accessory socket. Pin 2 to 6 according my my Corsair II manual. Lower left c
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00197.html (8,168 bytes)

355. Re: [TenTec] Argosy I issues as well as Argosy II issues (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:04:35 +0000
Mike, At the risk of stating the obvious, the Argosy II fault would seem to be somewhere in the Tx chain that is unique to 80m. That doesn't leave a lot: Heterodyne Oscillator Xtal Bandpass filter PA
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00310.html (10,228 bytes)

356. Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:18:54 +0000
1) Tuners struggle most when they're dealing with low impedances at low frequencies. So, using an electrically short dipole on 160m and then dividing the impedance by 4 is a bad idea - much better to
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00331.html (9,753 bytes)

357. Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:02:05 +0000
I have a BT1500A and it's a fine piece of kit. However the L-network configuration means it has limited matching range on 160m. Steve G3TXQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00345.html (9,544 bytes)

358. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II fluctuating Ic meter (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:11:43 +0000
That would be the first place I would look. I've also had problems with the Corsair II current metering; in each case it turned out to be nothing wrong with the signal chain - just the metering. Stev
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00355.html (8,586 bytes)

359. Re: [TenTec] G5RV (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:57:12 +0000
Interestingly, it isn't always true that running the ladder line all the way is lower loss than using coax for part of the run. Take the G5RV on 80m. At the end of the usual 30 odd feet of ladder lin
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00005.html (9,086 bytes)

360. Re: [TenTec] G5RV (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:50:19 +0000
Jerry, Yes, I'm sure. According to the VK1OD on-line calculator, at 3.8 MHz 100m of RG213 with 14-j1 as a load has a loss of 1.9dB; 100m of Wireman 551 with 14-j1 as the load has a loss of 3.1dB. I'm
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00019.html (10,167 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu