Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:steve@karinya.net: 479 ]

Total 479 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] 961 PS REPAIR / REPLACEMENT---WTB 961PS (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 19:38:45 +0100
When my 961 bridge rectifier failed I replaced it with a KBPC3510 - a drop in replacement rated at 1000v 35A. New cost here in UK is £2.40. No other components had failed on mine, but it would be wis
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00315.html (8,122 bytes)

42. [TenTec] Omni VI Mystery (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 13:30:37 +0100
Ever since I got my OmniVI I've been annoyed by a low level heterodyne whose pitch is independent of the main tuning but which changes rapidly with the PBT setting. There was some discussion of it on
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00040.html (9,726 bytes)

43. Re: [TenTec] Hercules 444 amp (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 19:27:55 +0100
Are they MRF428s ? http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/MRF428/1465-1187-ND/4429884 Steve G3TXQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00122.html (8,440 bytes)

44. Re: [TenTec] Hercules 444 amp (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:13:56 +0100
Or the OP could just buy some spare PA transistors for his 444 !! Steve G3TXQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00213.html (9,731 bytes)

45. Re: [TenTec] Hercules 444 amp (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:48:31 +0100
Rick, See my post of 9th August - the 5th in this thread. 73, Steve G3TXQ 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00216.html (10,134 bytes)

46. Re: [TenTec] Hercules 444 amp (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:19:14 +0100
John, I went by the TenTec manual here, which shows them as MRF428s: http://www.qsl.net/tentec/manuals/444.pdf If they are MRF428s, there seem to be some in stock here: http://www.digikey.com/product
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00217.html (10,937 bytes)

47. [TenTec] Model 260 PSU factory modifications (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 21:15:37 +0100
I recently bought a spare Model 260 PSU. Checking it out, on the regulator board I found a missing diode, and an extra diode, resistor and PNP transistor tacked at the rear of the PCB. At first I tho
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00225.html (7,684 bytes)

48. Re: [TenTec] 160 Meter Problem (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 19:02:55 +0100
Of course it doesn't have to be one or the other - I've arranged things so I can quickly switch between the two configurations. The top-loaded vertical configuration wins every time for DX and local
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00281.html (10,701 bytes)

49. Re: [TenTec] Model 1225 SWR and Wattmeter Kit (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:34:20 +0100
Some care has to be taken when interpreting the LP-100A's power readings. On my version it indicates Pfwd when the "F+R" mode is selected, and Pfwd-Pref when the "Net" mode is selected. I got caught
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00580.html (11,816 bytes)

50. Re: [TenTec] Model 1225 SWR and Wattmeter Kit (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:23:30 +0100
Things are seldom as simple as they at first appear! The Model 1225 - like all the SWR meters I've ever built or owned - does _not_ simply indicate power by measuring line voltage (V) and computing V
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00590.html (11,782 bytes)

51. Re: [TenTec] Digital display for Corsair 2 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 20:45:18 +0100
If you mean the display driver IC, there are plenty listed on eBay. That's where I got my last ones. Here's just one example: http://www.ebay.com/itm/1PCS-LED-DISPLAY-DRIVER-IC-MOTOROLA-DIP-18-MC1449
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00605.html (7,888 bytes)

52. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Mystery (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:02:26 +0100
Let's keep this in proportion, folks! From Jim's description of the symptoms, it seems likely there's a fault - which TT didn't spot - which stops the BFO being shifted on CW Tx; if that's the case i
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00896.html (9,226 bytes)

53. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Mystery (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:01:23 +0100
Jim, Try this simple experiment if you have a receiver that will cover 9MHz: 1) Take the top cover off the Omni (4 screws) 2) Place a piece of hook-up wire into the receiver's antenna socket and drap
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00907.html (9,402 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Mystery (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 20:23:14 +0100
Jim's getting RF out OK - it's just on the wrong frequency! All the symptons - including the fact that he can "artificially" compensate using XIT - points to the BFO not being pulled to the correct f
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00910.html (10,244 bytes)

55. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Mystery (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:32:57 +0100
Jim, The VI+ results look close to what you would expect, but the VI shift is far too small and confirms this is where the fault lies. The only thing that surprised me is that you couldn't hear the V
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00918.html (12,373 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Mystery (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:38:04 +0100
Jim, By "listening in" directly to the BFO signals at 9MHz you are independent of all the sidetone and XIT offset processing that goes on in the microprocessor. The BFO oscillator is completely free-
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00921.html (9,914 bytes)

57. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Mystery (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:07:01 +0100
The attached document may help understand the OmniVI mixing scheme a bit better: http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/temp/omni_mix.pdf Note that - ignoring the RTTY mode - the BFO is only ever on one of thr
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00928.html (11,397 bytes)

58. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI mystery (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:16:20 +0100
In my manual it reads: The trimmers can be set with a high resolution counter at connector 46 by switching modes in the order listed below and adjusting the corresponding trimmer for the frequency in
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00595.html (9,896 bytes)

59. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI mystery (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:20:44 +0100
Not for us Corsair owners ;) Steve G3TXQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00608.html (9,403 bytes)

60. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II, PTO output level (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:34:22 +0000
All four of mine measure close to 1.2v p/p Steve G3TXQ On 24/03/2014 20:06, Thomas Kuehl wrote: Hi, Does anyone know what the correct peak-to-peak output level is for a properly working Corsair II PT
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00208.html (8,217 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu