Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tim@ke4ke.com: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] CW Mobile (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 10:55:55 -0500
Hi, The logging by recorder is a good idea. One member of the Minnesota Wireless Association does it for the MN QSO Party with video and posts them to YouTube. I would miss some details in conversati
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-06/msg00056.html (11,903 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] CW mobile (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:58:49 -0500
Hehe, swells would be more predictable than pot-holes in the road. Tim KE4KE Sent from AOL Mobile Mail Talk story! I am in the midst of setting up for CW mobile in the PU truck. It will be a first. M
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-06/msg00085.html (10,036 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 21:15:30 -0500
Hi, I don't really have too much trouble with 50 watts, but then I run QRP a lot too. I used to run 10 watts SSB mobile. I do like the size of my Jupiter. I wouldn't expect any rig to be that big tod
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00111.html (11,757 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:26:44 -0500
Hi, Anyone want to compare the Johnson matchbox to a model 254? Thanks, Tim KE4KE Time and again we saw that at field day when using a Johnson Viking Matchbox 275w with two different openwire fed ant
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00184.html (12,211 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:14:18 -0500
Hi Jim, Found your TXNoise page a few years ago and have shared the link around some. Appreciate the page. It is very helpful. Tim KE4KE It is also a FACT that the Kenwood TS590 radio is a lot cleane
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00096.html (11,121 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:04:23 -0500
Hi, Ray Novak would agree with the budget level part. I remember hearing Ray Novak of Icom say several times that the IC-7300 was an introductory level radio. I think I remember that he said that it
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00098.html (9,251 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] First rig stories (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:52:14 -0500
Hi, First rig was a TT Argonaut 509 new from TT. I believe the serial was 02666? Eventually added the 405 linear. Unfortunately sold it at the Indianapolis hamfest before moving to Alaska where I end
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00329.html (8,490 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] ARGONAUT 515 problem (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 10:02:50 -0500
Hi Rick, This now sounds like a dirty switch contact. Tim KE4KE Last time I worked on Argonauts I had a scope, VTVM, signal generator, freq. counter, etc. Today I only have a DVM and a freq. counter.
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00070.html (13,605 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] ARGONAUT 515 problem (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 13:22:42 -0500
Hi Rick, One thing to consider is that a past owner made a modification? Tim KE4KE With the mode switch in SB-R on 80, it is in LSB. When I switch to 40m it is in USB. I have to turn the mode switch
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00083.html (17,085 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300 (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 09:07:22 -0500
Hi Rick, I spent the majority of my first years as a ham with just two radios, TT Argonaut 509 (1976) and then a TS-140s (1989). I had an IC-703+ (2010) for a couple years. After that I started tryin
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00121.html (15,260 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300 (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 09:25:06 -0500
Rick, Forgot to mention the number two radio has a typo in the first link's list. It is an Eagle. TS-599at should read TT-599at Tim KE4KE IMO this boils down to people being too darn lazy to do their
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00122.html (14,407 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] Preselector, was: Re: Scads of used Icom IC-7300 (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:59:25 -0500
Hi, These happened when I worked in Southeastern Minnesota in radio. In Faribault, MN, WA0SSN called me up one day asking if I could help with his 160 and 80 meter reception. The station had a Harris
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00250.html (8,666 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] An Update from Ten Tec (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 13:14:18 -0600
HI, I would imagine that a lot of people are waiting for the Rebel and Patriot to be available again. I would be interested in an Argonaut VII that covered 80-10 meters. The Eagle was available at a
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-11/msg00197.html (9,625 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] UPDATE: Status of Alpha RF Systems and TEN-TEC (score: 1)
Author: tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 10:37:46 -0600
Hi, Thanks for the update! I had a new Argonaut 509 which I sold before moving to Alaska. I now have my Dad's 515. I also have a Jupiter and Eagle. I can deal with the idea of replacing the Jupiter w
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-02/msg00155.html (14,718 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Scale Of Eagle Production (score: 1)
Author: tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:51:58 -0600
Good comments Scott, I have the Eagle and TS-590s. The 590s has a good receiver and is good on transmit spectral purity. The Eagle beats it on actual use on CW. Using the RF gain control I can reduce
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-02/msg00213.html (12,167 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] Scale Of Eagle Production (score: 1)
Author: tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 13:24:54 -0600
Thanks Ron, You made me think maybe we should happily consider the first run of Eagles all for Xenia? They could all sell out. Also consider the free advertising by those interviewing everyone there
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-02/msg00218.html (11,587 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut VI (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:12:49 -0600
Hi, Based on the options mentioned, make the box bigger! I suppose if it was just made deeper or longer then the same front face could be used. Tim KE4KE On 03/06/2017 12:41 PM, rick@dj0ip.de wrote:
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-03/msg00107.html (10,267 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut VI (score: 1)
Author: tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:53:51 -0600
Hi, Yes, I am afraid I was one of those who was some what vocal about adding 160m and leaving out 12m. I am aware that TT received positive comments about adding 160. One comment I had was that I cou
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-03/msg00121.html (11,462 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Prompt Ten Tec service (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:09:13 -0500
Hi, I'll add my similar experience from a couple months ago. It took just a bit longer, but no more than three weeks from shipping to receiving. My Eagle had a DC power related issue and would not po
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-06/msg00127.html (9,278 bytes)

40. [TenTec] Ten Tec Dayton? (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 11:15:02 -0500
Hello, Ten-Tec was at Dayton with the old rigs on display with one exception. An Omni VII+ was on display. I did not talk to Mike, but apparently this new Omni will be on sale at the web site soon or
/archives//html/TenTec/2019-05/msg00033.html (8,025 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu