Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:toby423@earthlink.net: 317 ]

Total 317 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TenTec] ocean noise (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:14:31 -0500
Tommy, I was one of those suggessting you check the sub receive AF gain. Sometimes it looks like it is turned down, but in reality it is cracked open just a little bit. You may not even see a little
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00445.html (10,611 bytes)

102. [TenTec] 2054 BETA (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:22:11 -0500
This is interesting, since this release is called a BETA version one could conclude that testing could be still going on, and that this is what they have so far to release. Toby W4CAK
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00481.html (7,291 bytes)

103. Re: [TenTec] 2054 BETA (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:50:19 -0500
Not frustrated at all......very happy to see progress being made for the Classic Orion. what
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00492.html (8,724 bytes)

104. Re: [TenTec] V2.0 for the original Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:51:20 -0500
Set the rolloff to 180 and the EQ to -8. Be careful with the SP. Immediately, bought to with it
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00516.html (8,919 bytes)

105. [TenTec] Version 2.xxx (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:26:57 -0500
As I work quite a bit of cw, I do not like the loss of audio between 200hz and 100hz. It is more than a "subtle loss" as explained in the website notes. In my 1.xxx version there is no loss of audio,
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00529.html (7,106 bytes)

106. Re: [TenTec] Orion I V2 beta (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:48:49 -0500
Mark, The audio indeed is rougher on the edges and not as robust as in 1.xxx versions. Here are a few other issues for someone to confirm and then report........... 1. SP is not working, very little
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00596.html (9,836 bytes)

107. [TenTec] Fw: Orion I V2 beta (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:12:11 -0500
Toby, Not a member of the TT list but I can confirm your findings on items 1 and 2: 1. SP is not working, very little change between settings of 1 to 9 2. The rolloff is acting like a VFO, the higher
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00615.html (8,064 bytes)

108. [TenTec] Loss of Audio in 2054 (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:55:03 -0500
The loss of audio between 200hz and 100hz when in cw mode is problematic for me, even though I have seen some posts that indicate it is not big deal for others. I commonly narrow down the cw filters
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00643.html (8,199 bytes)

109. Re: [TenTec] Loss of Audio in 2054 (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:09:08 -0500
Changing the taps does not seem to make any difference. By the way, Ten Tec calls it a 3.5 db loss. Toby W4CAK using to
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00646.html (8,310 bytes)

110. Re: [TenTec] Orion I V2 Beta (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:14:21 -0500
In addition to very little change between 1 to 9 on the Speech processor, there is also very little change in gain going from a setting of 10 to a setting of 90 on the mike gain. Toby W4CAK
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00647.html (9,387 bytes)

111. [TenTec] Orion Upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:03:25 -0500
Ron Spencer wrote..... anything above 5?>>> This seems to be a problem expecially on cw, but not so much on SSB. NR seems to be effective on SSB except for a slight loss of audio volume when engaged.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00662.html (6,952 bytes)

112. Re: [TenTec] LDG / Tentec Tuner for Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:32:52 -0500
Mark, You bring up a good point. I have wondered the same thing myself. Why doesn't TT sell aftermarket tuners for those who have changed their minds and let the owners roll their own so to speak. Th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00681.html (10,224 bytes)

113. Re: [TenTec] Loss of Audio in 2054 (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:44:38 -0500
I found the RX EQ functioned very well in 1.xxx version, in fact, now that you have brought it up, the new 2054 RX EQ seems to be acting like a volume control as it is turned from +20 to -20, instead
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00696.html (11,094 bytes)

114. [TenTec] 2054 (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:44:04 -0500
Yes, the core is stable with this firmware, but operationally it is a mess. Many of the operational features of the1.xxx firmware that were so great are now gone, and bugs galore for sure. Lots of wo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00700.html (8,386 bytes)

115. [TenTec] Ten Tec Repair Dept. (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:01:29 -0500
It would be hard to say how good the repair dept. is at Ten Tec except to say they are really GREAT! I took my Omni 6+ down for repair and the turnaround time was really good for this older rig. The
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00790.html (7,307 bytes)

116. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] Orion I firmware (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 10:11:24 -0500
V2.0 has been a bear for Gary and company, with many hours and weekends spent trying to get it right. But they seem to be caught in a loop in which when one thing gets fixed three other problem pop u
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00874.html (11,648 bytes)

117. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] Orion I firmware (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:28:49 -0500
Duane, the two rigs are having to be programmed seperately, but code from the O2 firmware is being transferred to the O1 from time to time for the BETA releases, which would seem to indicate that the
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00896.html (15,381 bytes)

118. Re: [TenTec] Ver 2.054 update - comments (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:32:16 -0500
Hank, I have a Centurion AMP and had trouble using the keying loop. On cw using the keying loop in the QSK mode on the amp, the cw keyed just fine. But when I went to turn the rig off, and then turn
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01067.html (9,960 bytes)

119. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.0 (not Orion II) (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:47:44 -0500
Since the O2 has obvious problems I suspect that all of Ten Tec's energies will be spent getting the O2 up to speed. This will create a further delay for the 2.0 version's release for the old Orion.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00160.html (8,120 bytes)

120. [TenTec] Firmware (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:00:40 -0500
I wonder if firmware made for the old Orion can be loaded into the O2. IF it can be then there are several old firmware versions that are pretty stable. Toby W4CAK
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00165.html (7,227 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
This search system is powered by Namazu