Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:toby423@earthlink.net: 317 ]

Total 317 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] Sweep on OII (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 23:20:03 -0500
Lee , are you saying the sweep does not work correctly in the O2? IF the sweep does not move when you move the VFO fast then that is not good at all. Any hope it will be fixed ? Toby W4CAK at
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00575.html (9,958 bytes)

82. [TenTec] Sweep on O2 (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:12:47 -0500
<<<<I'm not quite sure what you mean, but of course it moves when you tune. It doesn't move WHILE you tune, at "normal" tuning dial rates using the knob. The minute you stop, or even just hesitate, t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00596.html (7,883 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] Great Contest Radio? (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:22:34 -0500
I agree with Merle that the V2 version of the firmware needs a lot of work before it resembles anything like what we have in V1 of the code. Stability is preferred of course, but not at the expense o
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00657.html (14,223 bytes)

84. Re: [TenTec] Effect of roofing filter selection on Orion II NB (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:42:15 -0500
Straight and to the point with no pussyfooting around with superfulous verbiage! I like it like that! Toby W4CAK
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00702.html (9,633 bytes)

85. Re: [TenTec] orion with 2.055 firmware -- headphones? (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:15:15 -0500
Does this happen with your favorite 1.xxx version firmware or just 2055? See if it happnes with 1.xxx firmware....... Toby W4CAK audio breaking I any
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00711.html (12,279 bytes)

86. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] O2 Tx audio quality (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:16:06 -0500
To one degree or another all the O2's sound this way, and also 2056 on the Classic Orion does not sound as good as on the V1 versions of software. I have commented to a few O2 owners that their audio
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00993.html (11,982 bytes)

87. [TenTec] O2 Audio Testing/ Optimization (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:33:20 -0500
--3) In our opinions even with the OII setup as well as we can, Original Orion still sounds better>>>>> I can see now that my O1 is going up in value as each day goes by. Everyone is going to want th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01077.html (7,024 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] Orion & SDR1000 thoughts (GOOD post) (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:25:54 -0500
Yes, that was a good post, but makes me wonder if maybe most of us will transition to SDR rigs like the one put out by Flex Radio as it becomes a mature technology in the next few years. If the Orion
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01319.html (19,761 bytes)

89. Re: [TenTec] Orion & SDR1000 thoughts (GOOD post) (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 08:30:43 -0500
Agreed! V 2.0 needs work in several areas, especially with the TX audio. But I think many of these areas have been already covered in past weeks so I will not list them. We can only assume that work
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01343.html (10,605 bytes)

90. Re: [TenTec] The ORION II sure makes me happy (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:40:41 -0500
I have been disgusted with my Orion at times but it had nothing to do with anything said on this reflector. It is a good thing that people with differing points of view be allowed to express themselv
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01373.html (12,214 bytes)

91. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews? (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:59:18 -0500
I am not sure of what consists of a production run, but it is either 50 or 100. Only one production run of the O2 is out there compared to thousands of Pro 3's. I used to have a Pro 3 and sold it. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00069.html (10,185 bytes)

92. [TenTec] 2030 Posted (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:11:13 -0500
Version 2030 is posted on the RF Squared .Com for the O2.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00232.html (6,646 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] Orion firmware statistics and drift info (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 22:05:55 -0500
I have noticed this problem and installed a CPU fan to blow across the top on the Orion and this keeps the heat build up down considerably. I hung the fan under the shelf above the Orion attached wit
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00242.html (12,517 bytes)

94. Re: [TenTec] Adjustment on Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 08:51:03 -0500
On the Orion 1 that is the audio pot. Toby bottom side of the Orion II, roughly under the S-meter. Does anybody know what it's for?
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00253.html (7,755 bytes)

95. Re: [TenTec] Orion II questions (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 20:15:13 -0500
I am in agreement with you as far as the RF gain and the S meter is concerned. I have heard arguments for having the S meter go up as the RF gain goes down. But my preference would be to leave the wa
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00274.html (10,080 bytes)

96. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 13:41:09 -0500
Bill, I have seen these comments or arguments before about the RF gain and s meter, and I never had any problems setting the RF gain or threshold, In fact I use an old version of the firmware 1.367 w
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00281.html (11,081 bytes)

97. [TenTec] S meter and RF gain (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:27:21 -0500
<<< With the new RF gain S meter interaction, the S meter is always correct if the signal is above the RF gain setting>>> IF THE SIGNAL IS ABOVE THE RF GAIN SETTINGS..... This is precisely my point,
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00296.html (8,104 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] S meter and RF gain (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 19:13:16 -0500
Bill, there is nothing to get. I am merely stating that I would like the RF gain to be independent of the S meter and prefer it to work like it does in the 1.xxx version of software, instead of the w
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00302.html (9,698 bytes)

99. Re: [TenTec] Ocean noise (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 14:01:14 -0500
Must have missed which rig you are talking about... the Orion or the Orion 2? by side with no antenna the Orion has much moee internal noise. I think it is just a fact of life. 50-60%..still suspect
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00366.html (28,262 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] Ocean noise (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:34:38 -0500
Check and see if you might have the sub-receive AF gain cracked open a little. I often have had excess noise and find my sub receive AF gain is barely cracked open. it [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesti
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00371.html (32,263 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu