- 1. [TenTec] Argo review (score: 1)
- Author: Christopher Svenstedt <toffe@svenstedt.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 19:27:51 +0100
- Hi all, He.. I'm actually quoted in the review. And that's my opinion. The original 706 is a whole lot less radio then the Argo V. Despite all nuts and bolts, bells and whistles. Let the rise burn in
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00066.html (7,142 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] Another further re new Argo V (score: 1)
- Author: "Christopher Svenstedt" <toffe@svenstedt.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:11:23 +0100
- Hi, The Argo V finally reached the north pool. Well, not precisely... Sweden might be close enough ugh... I've hade my Argo v1.04 for 3 weeks now. Compared to my Icom 706 (version 1) the Argo is a wh
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00478.html (8,100 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Another further re new Argo V (score: 1)
- Author: "Christopher Svenstedt" <toffe@svenstedt.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:36:05 +0100
- Hi, Oh yes. That will probably fix it :) But I also have a erroneous behaviour sometimes when I press the V/M key. The display then shows a erroneous frequency readout and the rig gets silent. I have
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00524.html (7,443 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu