Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tongaloa@alltel.net: 159 ]

Total 159 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] FS: Delta 580 (score: 1)
Author: <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:53:39 -0500
interested in your delta, esp if you might be keen on a swap have argonaut 509 and some other gear -bob
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00232.html (7,731 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] Solid state amps (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 11:40:18 -0500
what sort of pulse width are you able to get? working on ionospheric sounder for the back yard :-) -bob Interesting item. By coincidence I am working on a power tube tester today. I built one some ti
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00320.html (10,293 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] Lightning, RF and Grounding [WAS - PS grounding] (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:29:22 -0500
While we are on the subject of lightning, let me mention a friend. I went to school with Scott Bradley, more years ago than I care to contemplate. While I went to learn about electronics, Scotty deci
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00389.html (8,998 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] Induction Field [WAS - PS grounding] (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:36:09 -0500
Pete OK But I still don't understand how enough EMF can be generated to cause problems. I'm probably confused by the ratings they use on MRI machines. When I'm in the MRI machine and it's a 0.5T fiel
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00402.html (10,604 bytes)

65. Re: Re: [TenTec] Induction Field [WAS - PS grounding] (score: 1)
Author: <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:53:39 -0500
Been doing a little research, more to do, since posing MRI question. Seems there is a high background field which is held constant, for proton alignment. Then there is a time varying field, much smal
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00429.html (10,967 bytes)

66. Re: Re: [TenTec] Induction Field [WAS - PS grounding] (score: 1)
Author: <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:03:33 -0500
SteveWowsa! Thanks! I must be crazy! This is just what I was looking for, without having to 'buy the book'. Might have to call doc friend on some of the medical terminology, but from quick skim just
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00430.html (8,930 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] Vendor wives? (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 10:59:27 -0500
old stuff is good too... I'm waiting for 'next generation' from TT. have old argonaut but for main station Happy with TR7/R7/Sherwood 7SP combo. stock numbers... NF -135dbm 100kc blocking 146db LO no
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00526.html (7,306 bytes)

68. Re: Re: [TenTec] Highlights of German Orion Review (score: 1)
Author: <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:52:37 -0500
If you travel, it's a big deal. Built in 'universal' power supply is nice too. Yeasu FT101B was really nice for travellers. With the actual radio getting smaller and lighter, it will be nice if someo
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00772.html (8,880 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 13:48:27 -0500
OK, I'm confused (puzzzled). If ORION was designed for contesting AND weak DX work. THE WHY DID TT LEAVE OUT A KEY FEATURE? PTT FOR CW? I am currently interested in the DX capabilities, BUT maybe wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01114.html (10,341 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Extended Report - IF Gain (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 13:55:59 -0500
Increasing the IF Gain on the Jupiter increases the receiver sensitivity by about 20db. Such a thing would be possible only on a very bad receiver. I don't own the Jupiter, but I doubt that it could
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01115.html (7,706 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:08:14 -0500
Yes, I was just giving the PTT on CW guys a hard time. My external PIN switch is set up for sequencing :-) But, I've not seen a small external sequencer for use with older amps that do not handle the
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01119.html (10,431 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] PTT vs QSK? (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:29:15 -0500
If ORION was designed for contesting AND weak DX work. THE WHY DID TT LEAVE OUT A KEY FEATURE? PTT FOR CW? I don't understand why PTT is so important. Wouldn't QSK with amp be better? I've heard big
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01122.html (12,528 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 15:57:34 -0500
Bob All amps do not handle key sequencing and some of us can build something for which a nice set of composite OZ's would be a better analogy than garden rollers. 73, -Bob ah7i A fascinating idea but
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01132.html (10,371 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 17:38:53 -0500
Sorry I don't understand. Though I guess if I could understand your point, it may well be I would agree with it. What is it that you can build for which a nice set of composite OZ's would be a better
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01143.html (13,856 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] Shootout at OK Corral (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:16:00 -0500
The bad news is that transceivers using these chips cannot be built on the cheap. The chips are expensive, and even more expensive are the software design teams that make them work. they can be buil
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00605.html (7,860 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] ~ 1/4 wave 160 doublet (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:17:52 -0400
Jim Vertical works well in the middle of the Pacific, provided you're not way up a valley :-). Soil conductivity in KH6 is generally WAY higher than mainland which is good (not many radials needed fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00681.html (8,968 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] Re: Rudimentary SWR question... (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:07:36 -0400
good description of short antenna efficiencies http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/D.Jefferies/radimp.html this is part of a larger writing that antenna experimenters might enjoy reading...I dd anywa
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00754.html (9,052 bytes)

78. [TenTec] what is so special about heil microphone elements? (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 11:00:29 -0500
Why all the fuss about these heil microphone elements? Why not use a standard mail order communications electret element such as used in cell phones? They are only a buck or so at the surplus store a
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00836.html (8,135 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] what is so special about heil microphone elements? (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:43:40 -0500
The cell phone elements are not tailored for voice? I've a couple of nice old mics that used crystals and the crystals being hygoscopic have 'worn out'. Guess I could try one of the cell phone elemen
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00856.html (8,945 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] Reply to N1EU / Barry (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:36:23 -0500
here run 2.3kc followed by a 2.1kc, both 8 pole and it makes a big difference on crowded band. for CW, which is 99% of activity, the 2.1 follows a .300 or a .500 and believe it ot not makes a big dif
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00910.html (8,744 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu